Pragmatics 2 Ling 400 Entailment vs Implicature John

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Pragmatics 2 Ling 400

Pragmatics 2 Ling 400

Entailment vs. Implicature John and Mary are students. == entails ==> John is a

Entailment vs. Implicature John and Mary are students. == entails ==> John is a student. I have a car. == implicates ==> I have exactly one car. Entailments cannot be canceled; Implicatures can be.

Grice’s idea • People normally follow “rules of conversation” when they talk, and they

Grice’s idea • People normally follow “rules of conversation” when they talk, and they expect others to do the same. • Some inferences can be made on this assumption. • But such rules are not absolute and can be interpreted in different ways in different contexts unlike entailments.

Maxim of Quantity 1. Make your contribution to the conversation as informative as required.

Maxim of Quantity 1. Make your contribution to the conversation as informative as required. 2. Do not make your contribution any more informative than necessary. • This means that you should provide the right amount of information.

Conversational maxims (Grice) • Quantity: Say neither more nor less than the discourse requires

Conversational maxims (Grice) • Quantity: Say neither more nor less than the discourse requires • Relevance/Relation: Be relevant. • Manner: Be brief and orderly; avoid ambiguity and obscurity. • Quality: Do not lie or make unsupported claims.

Maxim of Relation/Relevance • • Maxim of Relevance _ Be relevant. _ Is Jamie

Maxim of Relation/Relevance • • Maxim of Relevance _ Be relevant. _ Is Jamie dating anyone these days? _ Well, she goes to Cleveland every weekend.

Temporal Sequence (1) Annie took off her socks. She jumped into bed. (2) Annie

Temporal Sequence (1) Annie took off her socks. She jumped into bed. (2) Annie jumped into bed. She took off her socks. The order of the sentences is normally taken to be the order of the associated events. It’s an implicature since (3) is acceptable. (3) Annie took off her socks and jumped into bed, but I do not know which she did first. We can appeal to Maxim of Manner.

Maxim of Quantity • Maxim of Quantity A: Have you finished your homework for

Maxim of Quantity • Maxim of Quantity A: Have you finished your homework for all your classes? B: I’ve finished my biology homework. Implicature: I have not finished my homework for all my classes.

Moore’s Paradox (1) The cat is on the mat, but I do not believe

Moore’s Paradox (1) The cat is on the mat, but I do not believe it. (1) sounds contradictory, but why? This is because we are assumed to speak the truth. The first conjunct is understood to mean “I believe that the cat is on the mat”. The second sentence then contradicts this implicit belief. We can appeal to Maxim of Quality.

Flouting the Maxims Recommendation Letter: I am writing to recommend Joe Blow for graduate

Flouting the Maxims Recommendation Letter: I am writing to recommend Joe Blow for graduate study. He was my advisee, and I have always found him unfailingly polite and punctual. Also, he dresses extremely well. A: When am I going to get back the money I lent you? B: Boy, it’s hot in here.

Presupposition • We say “S 1 presupposes S 2” when the truth of S

Presupposition • We say “S 1 presupposes S 2” when the truth of S 2 is taken for granted when S 1 is used/uttered. • E. g. Did you stop embezzling public funds? • Presupposition: You embezzled public funds at least once before.

Entailment, Presupposition, Implicatures • S 1 entails S 2 when the truth of S

Entailment, Presupposition, Implicatures • S 1 entails S 2 when the truth of S 1 guarantees the truth of Sv and the falsity of S 2 guarantees the falsity of S 1 • S 1 presupposes S 2 when using S 1 (whether or not S 1 is true) requires the truth of S 2. Thus, the falsity of S 2 causes S 1 to sound “funny”. Presup. generally survives under negation. • S 1 implicates S 2 when using S 1 suggests the truth of S 2, but this can be canceled.

Entailment • S 1 and S 2 entails S 1 • Robin is a

Entailment • S 1 and S 2 entails S 1 • Robin is a bachelor entails that Robin is male.

Presupposition • Bill regrets that he got married. Presup. : He (Bill) got married.

Presupposition • Bill regrets that he got married. Presup. : He (Bill) got married. • Bill does not regret that he got married. Presup. : He (Bill) got married. stop, another, both, etc. have presuppositions.

Implicatures • As we saw above, implicatures stem from pragmatic principles like rules of

Implicatures • As we saw above, implicatures stem from pragmatic principles like rules of conversation and can be cancelled. E. g. Not all students came to the meeting. Implicates Some students came to the meeting. (Maxim of quantity)

Language in Advertising • In advertising, the bottom line is that they want to

Language in Advertising • In advertising, the bottom line is that they want to sell. • Open-ended comparatives. (Grocery Store) Lower sounds better than low but promises nothing.

More examples from Ads • Get up to ten times stronger hair. (Pantene Pro.

More examples from Ads • Get up to ten times stronger hair. (Pantene Pro. V) • It could save you up to 15% on Allstate homeowners insurance. • Ford LTD is 700% quieter. • More people sleep on Sealy Posturpedic. • Maytags are built to last longer and need fewer repairs

Technical Terms in Ads For example, no-fee offers for cash advances carry hefty interests.

Technical Terms in Ads For example, no-fee offers for cash advances carry hefty interests. no-fee, free ≠ no interest