POVERTY AND ANTIPOVERTY POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES S M
- Slides: 75
POVERTY AND ANTI-POVERTY POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES S. M. VIJAYANAND SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PANCHAYATI RAJ GOVERNMENT OF INDIA December, 2015
POVERTY Ø Distinguish ü ü ü Experiencing poverty Understanding poverty By the poor themselves Defining poverty By experts Measuring poverty By social/democratic Identifying the poor consensus Targeting programmes/schemes 2
EXPERIENCING POVERTY Ø Can be proxy only - empathy Ø Through field immersions Ø Through intense and repeated participatory processes like Focus Group Discussions, Livelihood Analysis, Wealth Ranking, etc. Ø Listening to the voices of the poor Ø Content analysis of narratives of the poor 3
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY Ø Absolute Poverty ü Just subsistence → surviving; keeping body and soul together – not “LIFE” in the normal sense ü Even absolute poverty is related to the current living standards → to a moving average ü Value-judgement on standards, distance → towards a socially acceptable construct ∟after debate, discussion 4
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd. . ) Ø Relative Poverty ü To the median → 60% in Europe Ø Chronic Poverty ü Trapped in poverty Ø Transient Poverty ü Slipping into poverty – about 1/3 rd 5
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd…) Ø Dimensions of poverty [Robert Chambers] ü Multi-dimensional → Ratchet effect ∟Mutually interacting → Web of disadvantages ü Capabilities → Low education, skills → Poor information ü Livelihoods and Assets → Precarious → Inadequate ü Places → Unserviced → Stigmatized, isolated 6
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd…) ü Body → Hungry, sick ü Gender relations → Unequal ü Social relations → Discriminatory ü Security → Unprotected ü Behaviour → Disregard/abuse by the powerful ü Institutions → Disempowering/excluding ü Organizations → Weak and disconnected 7
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY(contd…) Ø Poverty as ü Vulnerability → facing uninsurable risks ü ü Uncertainty Insecurity → susceptibility to violence ü ü ü Powerlessness Voicelessness Marginalization → vis-a-vis society, economy, polity, geography ü ü ü “Unsanitation” Capability deprivation Denial of human rights 8
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd…) Ø Links with Social Structure/values ü Race/Caste ü Class ü Gender → feminization of poverty ü Age ü Dependence/unfreedom Ø Relational/symbolic aspects – “Othering” ü Voicelessness, disrespect, stigma ü Through “language” images ü Insinuating shame, humiliation 9
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd…) ü Line between ‘us’ and ‘them’ → Imbued with negative value judgements ü Suggesting moral contamination ü Seen as economic burden ü At best objects of pity and charity ü Perceived as undeserving (Eg: of 25% in RTE) ü Portrayed as criminal, anti-social → Prejudiced stereotypes 10
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd…) Ø Psychology of the poor ü ü Lack of confidence, self-belief, self-esteem Shame, non-participation, inferiority Resignation to “fate” Alienation 11
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd…) Ø ‘Culture’ of poverty ∟pathologizing poverty & welfare [Oscar Lewis] → a myth increasingly gaining prominence ü Aggressiveness/violence ü Low self-esteem/avoidance ü Intra-family violence → Stress-induced ü Emotional instability → Anxiety 12
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd…) Ø Equality ü Equality of opportunity → → ‘real’ ‘actual’ ∟ starting position should not affect ability to succeed Meritocracy could generate winners but losers as well ü Equality of outcomes → not starting points but end results → beyond opportunities to attainments ü Equity → fair but different treatment to reduce inequality of outcomes 13
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd…) MOST OF THE TIMES INEQUALITY IS MORE HARMFUL THAN EVEN POVERTY [Refer: -“Capital in the 21 st Century” – Thomas Piketty “The Spirit Level” – Richard Wilkinson & Kate Pickett]
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY(contd…) Ø Social Justice ü Choice of the word “justice” → → moral element rectification of a wrong principle of merit, deservingness, fairness right to be equal ü Focus on “Social” → → not primarily economic indicating complexities and perversities of social order social, affecting economic and then political position towards fraternity – social inclusion 15
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY (contd…. ) Ø Social Justice ü Problems of SCs → → → → Poor asset base Low skill levels Decline of agriculture Slow mobility └ └ fewer new generation jobs fewer positive migration Dependent on declining services from public institutions Weak political power OR Identity politics not leading to development politics Limitation of reservations └ creamy layer Severe social stigma 16
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY(contd…. ) Ø Social Justice ü Problems of STs → → → → → Ruthless direct exploitation Slow transition – anthropological sense └ Not acclimatized to capitalism Loss of commons/dispossession └ displacement Destruction of traditional strengths └ ALIENATION Poor political consciousness Weak leadership Differential levels of development Different understanding of Justice and Rights ∟ Mismatch between two distinct sets of understanding and systems Extremism └ Vicious cycle 17
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY(contd…. ) Ø Social Justice ü Approach to SC/ST Development → Positive discrimination → From ‘WELFARE’ to ‘DEVELOPMENT’ → From basic minimum needs to economic and human development → From ‘SOCIAL RIGHTS’ to ‘DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS’ → Beyond targets └ Sub-plan approach └ Specificities – not homogeneous 18
UNDERSTANDING POVERTY(contd…) Ø Summing up ü Don’t reduce poverty to abstract concepts and mere numbers → The poor are as human with as much potential as any other group ü Understand poverty with the “heart”, feel poverty with the “mind” – harmonize using the soul 19
DEFINITIONS Ø “Persons having per capita income of Rs. 27[32]* per day in rural areas and Rs. 33[47]* per day in urban areas enabling them to have a calorie intake of 2400 in rural areas and 2100 in urban areas along with some other basics like fuel, clothing, etc. (Planning Commission) [*Proposed by Rangarajan Committee] Ø “Lacking resources to obtain the types of diet, participate in the activities and have the living conditions and amenities which are customary or at least widely encouraged or approved, in the societies to which they belong – excluded from ordinary living patterns, customs and activities. ” (Townsend 1979)
DEFINITIONS (contd. . . ) Ø Poverty is not a certain small amount of goods, nor is it a relation between means and ends; above all it is a relation between people. Poverty is a social status. ……… It has grown as an invidious distinction between classes. . (Marshall Sahlins in Stone Age Economics) Ø “Deprivation of ability to live as a free and dignified human being with the full potential to achieve one’s desired goals. ” (Amartya Sen) 21
DISCOURSES ON POVERTY Ø Monetary discourse ü Started in end 19 th Century → Charles Booth (1887) in East London → Seebohm Rowntree (1899) in York ü ü → First to break the myth of poverty as moral punishment of nature Shortfall from a certain level of resources measurable in monetary terms “Objectivity” of economists → Compulsion to count and measure → Penchant for inter-temporal and inter-spatial comparisons 22
DISCOURSES ON POVERTY(contd. . . ) Ø Capability discourse ü ü Sen’s concept of “capabilities” and “functionings” Capabilities → → → ü Real, substantive freedoms/abilities to achieve the life one has reason to value Choosing from different kinds of life possible Alternative combinations of functionings a person can achieve Notions of freedom and real opportunities regarding life What is effectively possible Basic capabilities → Education, health, nutrition, shelter Poverty as deprivation of basic capabilities 23
DISCOURSES ON POVERTY(contd. . . ) ü Functionings → → → Beings, doings Achievements – what a person manages to do or be Use a person makes of different “commodities” at his command Realized attainments Could be simple like “nourished”, “literate” or complex like “public action” ü Special features of the capability discourse → Focus on human aspects └ respecting people’s ability to pursue the ends they value → Focus on what people are able to do or be └ └ as opposed to what they have or how they feel not as means of living but as actual opportunities 24
DISCOURSES ON POVERTY(contd. . . ) → → → Multi-dimensional perspective Stress on diversity of needs and priorities Brings to the fore constraints restricting human lives Focus on what is intrinsically important – not on what is instrumentally important like income Moral considerations and ethical and normative principles └ justice → Links individual, family, community and the state → Goes beyond poverty and deprivation to well-being CONTRIBUTED TO THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT APPROACH └ Process of enlarging choices 25
DISCOURSES ON POVERTY(contd. . . ) Ø Social exclusion discourse ü Mainly in European discourse on poverty ü Emphasizes the relational aspects of poverty ü Can be active or passive process by the agency of others by self ü Result of social and cultural injustices generated by inequalities of gender, race, sexuality, ethnicity, caste, age, disability 26
DISCOURSES ON POVERTY(contd. . . ) ü Denotes → → → → falling out of welfare net not participating in collective social life denied opportunities to enjoy leisure lack of voice in decision making discrimination unenforced rights losing out in the specialization requirements of the economy poor access to public services ü In aggressive individualistic meritocracy competition, poverty denotes failure ü Risk of two-tier society glorifying → alienation breeds antipathy 27
MEASURING POVERTY Ø National Planning Committee 1939 ü Rs. 15 to 20 per capita per month Ø Planning Commission Working Group 1962 ü Recommended Rs. 20 per capita per month in terms of 1960 -61 prices for rural area and Rs. 25 per capita per month in urban areas. → Excluded expenditure on health and education – assumed to be free Ø Task Force 1979 (under Dr. Y. K. Alagh) ü Poverty line linked to calorie intake ü Rs. 49. 09 per capita per month in rural areas and Rs. 56. 64 per month in urban areas at 1973 -74 prices.
MEASURING POVERTY(contd…) Ø Expert Group 1993 (headed by Dr. D. T. Lakdawala) ü Disaggregated State specific poverty lines – both for rural and urban areas ü Accepted in 1997 and methodology continued till January, 2011 Ø Expert Group (headed by Dr. S. D. Tendulkar) ü Recommended moving away from a purely calorie-based norms ü Accounted for adequate private expenditure on nutrition, health and education 29
MEASURING POVERTY(contd…) Ø Rangarajan Committee ü Introduced new Poverty Line Basket (PLB) → FOOD Urban • Calorie requirement • Protein • Fats Rural 2155 K cal. 2090 K cal. 48 gm. 50 gm. 28 gm. 26 gm. ∟ In conjunction with public provision of full nutrition support for children of the age group 0 to 6 and universal public provision of a range of goods and services like sanitation, drainage, drinking water and primary health care. → NON-FOOD ∟ In addition to education and clothing, rent, mobility, etc. taken into account 30
IDENTIFYING THE POOR Ø Done by State Governments based on instructions of the Ministry of Rural Development Ø VI Plan and VII Plan ü Done locally as part of IRDP identifying families having annual income of less than Rs. 4800. Ø VIII Plan (1992) ü Formal survey done and families classified into income range → → Below Rs. 4000 – 6000 → Rs. 6000 – 8500 → Rs. 8500 – 11000 31
IDENTIFYING THE POOR (contd…. ) Ø IX Plan (1997) ü ü Introduction of exclusion criteria like pucca house, consumer goods, etc. Use of expenditure to determine people Below Poverty Line Ø X Plan (2002) ü ü Use of 13 socio-economic parameters each having four scores. Sates give the ceiling of BPL families equivalent to State poverty percentage as determined by the Planning Commission plus 10%. Ø XI Plan ü N. C. Saxena Committee (2009) → Introduced concept of automatic inclusion Ø Socio-Economic Caste Census 32
TARGETTING PROGRAMMES Ø Gradual shift from BPL ∟except in the case of National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) and Indira Aawas Yojana (IAY) ü Universal and demand based in respect of MGNREGS ü Participatory identification for NRLM ü Largely inclusive for food security ∟ 75% in rural areas ∟ 50% in urban areas ü Moving towards objective criteria for universal coverage → Related to condition of house and condition of toilet in respect of Total Housing and SBA. 33
EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION POST-INDEPENDENCE ØCommunity Development Phase ü Grow More Food Enquiry Committee by Shri V. T. Krishnamachari → Agriculture alone will not work └ need for wider focus on village economy └ need for local democratic leadership └ need for well-managed extension services 34
EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION (contd…) ü Drawing on lessons from the earlier experience particularly Etawah and Nilokheri → Piloted in 165 blocks in 1952 with US support → Concept of block as a rational, neutral, development geography └ About 250 sq. kms having a population of 60000 to 70000 35
EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION (contd…) → In the initial years, the focus was on mobilizing the community for local level development particularly on infrastructure and agriculture └ heavy stress on people’s contribution → New developmental bureaucracy focusing on extension → S. K. Dey identified the missing spark plug └ people’s movement without people’s representatives 36
EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION (contd…) ü Improvements during Second Five Year Plan → Importance given to Panchayati Raj → Participatory planning initiative └ └ Block Development Committee (BDC) District Development Committee (DDC) 37
EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION (contd…) Ø 1960 s ü Changes during Third Five Year Plan → Negative consequences of two wars and droughts → All attention shifted to food production through technology inputs → Departmentalization began and Block became weaker 38
EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION (contd…) Ø 1970 s ü Direct attack on poverty → → → Antyodaya Initial focus on small and marginal farmers and agricultural labour and schemes in the primary sector Special approach for SCs/STs TSP - 1975 ICDS - 1975 SCP – 1979 -80 → Attempt to de-bureaucratize implementation systems and professionalize SFDA/DRDA ↓ ↓ 1975 1980 planning and 39
EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION (contd…) Ø 1980 s ü ü ü Focus on self-employment under IRDP → Beginnings of the group approach under DWCRA Extension of wage employment programme → NREP, RLEGP Beginnings of provision of Basic Minimum Needs → → Housing Sanitation Water Supply [started in 1970 s] Roads 40
EVOLUTION OF POLICY ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION (contd…) Ø 1990 s ü ü ü 73 rd Amendment – but not followed up SHG – first by NGOs and then by NABARD Social security schemes initiated - NSAP ü New generation schemes launched ØPost-2000 – PMGSY, MGNREGS, NRLM (including Skills) Towards a more comprehensive approach with accent on planning from below 41
SUMMARY OF ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGIES FOLLOWED SPECIFIC STRATEGIES ØSelf-employment ü ü Initially credit linked to subsidy and activity-oriented – for individuals Gradual shift to group economic activity – mid 80 s Further shift to group formation and savings – late 90 s Paradigm shift to organization of the poor and comprehensive concept of livelihoods – 2010 onwards ØUnskilled wage-employment ü ü From allocation-based to rights-based From selected districts to universal coverage 42
SUMMARY OF ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGIES FOLLOWED (contd…) ØSkilled jobs ü Skilling and placing in the formal sector ü New generation jobs ØBasic minimum needs ü Moving towards convergence ØMinimalist social security ü NSAP ü Basic insurance schemes ØToken attempt at technology transfer – CAPART ØSmall effort to promote public action – CAPART 43
Ø SUMMARY OF ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGIES FOLLOWED (contd…) All the strategies have strong equity and social justice component ü ü ü 60% houses and toilets for SC/ST 50% of self-employment to SC/ST 15% of housing and self-employment to minority 3% of individual schemes for people with disabilities Ø RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT ü ü ü Right to Information Right to Work Right to Education Forest Rights Right to Food 44
SUMMARY OF ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGIES FOLLOWED (contd…) ALLIED STRATEGIES ØHuman Development ü Nutrition ü Health ü Education ØMinor interventions Management in Natural Resources 45
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES(…. contd) NRLM Ø Represents a paradigm shift in poverty reduction policy Ø Need to unlearn, de-school, de-construct ü Not old wine in new bottles Ø Focus on empowerment of the poor to enable them to demand, negotiate and access rights and entitlements ü Critical for realizing rights-based development Ø Programme designed based on evidence in different socio-economic conditions ü Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Bihar 46
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) Ø Focus on livelihoods – a much broader concept than poverty ü Livelihoods denotes → → → Means of gaining a living Performing activities Using resources – tangible and intangible Combining in several forms In a sustainable manner ü “Coping” with “risk” i. e. likelihood of occurrence of external shocks and stresses and “vulnerability” i. e. degree of exposure to risk and uncertainty ∟“adaptation”, “improvement”, “diversification” and “transformation” in due course 47
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) ü Definition of Chambers & Conway (1990) → “a livelihood comprises the capabilities, assets (stores, resources, claims and access) and activities required for a means of living: a livelihood is sustainable which can cope with and recover from stress and shocks, maintain or enhance its capabilities and assets, and provide sustainable livelihoods at the local and global levels and in the long and short term. ” ü People draw from a range of resources to manage or compose their livelihoods → Poor people are managers of complex “asset” portfolios ü Role of different types of “assets” 48
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) ü Features of the Livelihoods Approach → Holistic appreciation of the different dimensions of poverty ∟beyond income and employment → Inter-sectoral → Dynamic understanding of complex local realities ∟deeply related to the context ∟diversity of approaches → Building more on abilities than on resources → Starting with strengths and not on needs → Focus on people ∟at different stages of the life-cycle 49
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) → Recognizes importance of social, political, economic and environmental contexts ∟In mediating access to assets → Gradualistic but organic → Multi-level ∟Family ∟Community ∟Area ∟State ∟Nation → Focus on ∟Promotion – Livelihoods, Skills ∟Protection – Social Services ∟Provision – Basic Needs 50
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (contd…. ) Ø A networked organization of the poor ü About 8 to 10 crore families to be organized into 80 to 100 lakh SHGs (with each family being represented by a woman) which would be federated into about 6 lakh village organizations and 24 thousand cluster level federations → Feminization and democratization of anti-poverty strategies 51
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (contd…. ) ØSelf-identification of the poor through a community based process using transparent indictors – reducing patronage, breaking free from the tyranny of the arbitrary ü Deep self and group understanding of poverty – Analysis, Reflection, Action ØFocus on social inclusion ü SC, ST, differently-abled, other vulnerable groups 52
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) Ø Addressing capability deprivations Ø Addressing risk and vulnerability ü Focus on poorest of the poor Ø Partnership and alliances ü With R&D/Academic institutions ü With NGOs ü Among CBOs Across States § Learnings Ø Strengthening the capacity to demand access entitlements Ø Empowerment and potential for public action breaking conventional barriers Ø Transparency and intense monitoring 53
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) Ø New approach to staffing and organizational culture ü De-bureaucratization ü Mission staff based on clear HR policy – specially skilled from within government or even outside government ü Supplemented by young professionals ü Further supplemented by Community Resource Persons 54
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) Ø Community Resource Persons ü For taking NRLM across States ü For accessing financial services ü For accessing social security ü Providing agricultural services ü Food Security services ü Providing livestock support services ü Entitlement services → → → E. g. Bank Mitra in AP/Telangana, Bihar Insurance Pensions 50 lakh acres 50 lakh litres of milk per day MGNREGS in Kerala 55
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) ü Land Rights access → 2 million acres in AP/ Telangana ü Micro enterprises ü Accounts/Audit services ü Care services ü Capacity Building services ü Nutrition services ü Health services ü Technical services → Barefoot engineers 56
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) DIFFERENT ASSETS OF THE POOR Ø Social Capital ü Democratic Organization ü Processes – Community Operations Manual (COM) ü Relationships and values ü Nurturing Leaders - CRPs ü Capacity building 57
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) Ø Financial Capital ü No capital subsidy ü Interest subsidy ü Multiple financial products ü Loan linkage 58
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) Ø Physical Capital ü Ø Natural Capital ü ü Ø Convergence of anti-poverty programmes Agriculture Eco-development Human Capital ü ü ü Nutrition Health Education Skill enhancement Social Security 59
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) Ø Civic Capital ü ü Rights of citizens Voice in participatory fora Ø Political Capital ü ü ü Role in Gram Sabha Participatory planning PRI partnership Realize entitlements Move on to become elected representatives 60
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (…. contd) LADDER OF EMPOWERMENT Self Selection on ‘merit’ Meeting/Talking Gaining confidence Relationship development Group formation NEW IDENTITY 61
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES [NRLM] (contd…. . ) Savings Borrowing for consumption Consulting/Discussions Petitioning Seeking basic benefits CITIZENSHIP CIVIC CAPITAL FORMATION 62
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES [NRLM] (contd…) Borrowing for expanding existing economic activity Situation analysis of family and neighbourhood Requesting for basic minimum needs Striving for diversification of economic activity Awareness of development rights ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL AND PHYSICAL CAPITAL FORMATION 63
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (contd…. ) Focus on Health and Education Taking up activities of care and compassion Planning for Local area HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN CAPITAL FORMATION 64
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (contd…) Partnering Influencing Voice and Demand Awareness of human Rights Awareness of ecological Rights Working together and alliance formation SOCIAL AND ECOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL AND GREEN CAPITAL FORMATION 65
NEW GENERATION ANTI-POVERTY SCHEMES[NRLM] (contd…. ) Anticipatory action Autonomous decision Public action “opening the door on hearing the footsteps” Developmental participation POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT POLITICAL CAPITAL FORMATION 66
CONVERGENT LOCAL PLANNING FOR POVERTY REDUCTION ICDS – three streams FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY Mid-day meals SABLA – for adolescent girls PDS – Right to Food 67
CONVERGENT LOCAL PLANNING FOR POVERTY REDUCTION (contd…) Housing Toilet BASIC MINIMUM NEEDS IAY SBM Drinking Water NRDWP Environmental sanitation FFC Power Connectivity Physical connectivity Playground Parks Crematoria DDUGJY MNRES schemes PMGSY MGNREGS FFC 68
CONVERGENT LOCAL PLANNING FOR POVERTY REDUCTION (contd…) NSAP RSBY ASRAYA PALLIATIVE CARE SOCIAL SECURITY INSURANCE SCHEME PMJDY JSY Care for the aged Care for the challenged 69
CONVERGENT LOCAL PLANNING FOR POVERTY REDUCTION (contd…) Health NHM HUMAN DEVELOPMENT RSBY Education ICDS SSA/RMSA Right to Education 70
CONVERGENT LOCAL PLANNING FOR POVERTY REDUCTION (contd…) SCSP SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ECO DEVELOPMENT MGNREGS NRLM FFC TSP MGNREGS 71
CONVERGENT LOCAL PLANNING FOR POVERTY REDUCTION (contd…) Cash Income MGNREGS RKVY Agriculture ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Microenterprises Salaried Job PMKSY MGNREGS NRLM (MKSP) NRLM RSETI DDU-GKY NRLM Credit DRI PMJDY
FOR REFLECTION THREE RINGS OF POVERTY (1963 -64) S. No. STATE Severe destitution* Destitution* Poverty* 1. Andhra Pradesh 15. 5 26. 6 41. 8 2. Assam 1. 5 3. 9 9. 0 3. Bihar 13. 3 23. 4 35. 3 4. Gujarat 11. 0 17. 5 31. 2 5. Jammu & Kashmir 2. 4 7. 6 15. 4 6. Kerala 18. 8 30. 4 44. 4 7. Madhya Pradesh 15. 7 25. 3 37. 1 8. Madras (Tamil Nadu) 12. 4 20. 8 34. 9
FOR REFLECTION(contd…) 9. Maharashtra 12. 3 22. 8 35. 9 10. Mysore (Karnataka) 16. 8 29. 4 44. 0 11. Orissa 18. 0 28. 0 40. 8 12. Punjab (including Haryana) 8. 8 14. 5 22. 1 13. Rajasthan 13. 2 22. 3 34. 2 14. Uttar Pradesh 17. 0 26. 8 39. 1 15. West Bengal 5. 9 13. 2 22. 9 16. Union Territories 13. 2 22. 4 34. 6 All India *Monthly per capita expenditure classes: Rural: Rs. 0 -11 Severe Destitution, Rs. 0 -13 Destitution, Rs. 0 -15 Poverty Urban: Rs. 0 -15 Severe Destitution, Rs. 0 -18 Destitution, Rs. 0 -24 Poverty 74
75
- Relative and absolute poverty difference
- National programme related to child health and welfare
- Mental health policy, plans and programmes michelle funk
- Components of primary health care
- Marcus scheuren
- Talent mobility programmes
- Fictional programmes
- Designing marketing program to build brand equity
- Ipcat2
- Eps niveau 3
- Agriseta funding
- Prerequisite program template
- Programme de tlvision demain soir
- François sanche fils de bobino
- Agriseta skills programmes
- Activité vivre ensemble maternelle
- Jesus youth six pillars
- Xcap gestion des programmes et dnc
- Motor programmes
- Ifric 13 customer loyalty programmes
- Public employment programmes
- Relative and absolute poverty
- Poverty and juvenile delinquency
- Esperanza’s house symbolizes poverty and
- St john chrysostom on wealth and poverty pdf
- Poverty and hunger solutions
- Symbolic interactionist perspective on poverty
- Ministry of housing and urban poverty alleviation
- Inequality and poverty
- Greed and poverty
- Security program and policies principles and practices
- Recruitment selection and induction process
- Security program and policies principles and practices
- Security program and policies principles and practices
- Security program and policies principles and practices
- Security program and policies principles and practices
- Poverty definition economics
- Structural poverty
- Oscar lewis culture of poverty
- Ways to reduce poverty
- Sharecropper cycle of poverty
- Hidden rules of poverty
- Mark twain gilded age quotes
- Schema language development
- Sailmaker poverty quotes
- Types of poverty in economics
- Definitions of poverty
- Solution
- Causes of poverty
- Songs about poverty
- No poverty
- What is relative poverty
- Mental model of poverty
- Mental model of poverty
- Ruby k payne a framework for understanding poverty
- Ruby payne framework for understanding poverty
- Poverty formula
- Generational poverty
- Poverty brainstorming
- Generational poverty
- Social qs
- Poverty proofing
- Human poverty index calculation
- Situational poverty definition
- What groups were experiencing poverty in the 1950’s?
- The causes of poverty
- Situational poverty definition
- Keywords for poverty
- My experience with poverty
- Watson brake
- Cartoon jfk
- No poverty
- The causes of poverty
- Child poverty in massachusetts
- Headcount index example
- Catholic teaching on poverty