Platform Technology for Neurodegenerative Diseases Landscape and Roadmap

  • Slides: 30
Download presentation
Platform Technology for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Landscape and Roadmap development Jude Bek Computer Science/ Neuroscience

Platform Technology for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Landscape and Roadmap development Jude Bek Computer Science/ Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology University of Manchester

Objectives Centralising research initiatives in technology for ND - Across Uo. M faculties and

Objectives Centralising research initiatives in technology for ND - Across Uo. M faculties and schools/divisions • Strengthening funding bids & external collaborations • Working with Dementia@Manchester • Support from Manchester Informatics http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 2

Connecting technological capability and clinical need Tech: Clinical: Objective/quantitative measurement Diagnosis Continuous/frequent data collection

Connecting technological capability and clinical need Tech: Clinical: Objective/quantitative measurement Diagnosis Continuous/frequent data collection Heterogeneous data Algorithms/models Monitoring Treatment Solutions: Communication Biomarker identification Profiling/stratification Individualised treatment/Precision medicine Cost-effective interventions Living well http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 3

Technological solutions for neurodegeneration Clinical assessments are typically: • • • Subjective – clinician/patient/carer

Technological solutions for neurodegeneration Clinical assessments are typically: • • • Subjective – clinician/patient/carer Categorical Temporally constrained – clinic visits Unrepresentative – stress/ecological validity Insensitive to subtle change Outdated? Going beyond traditional clinical measures: • • Scope/complexity of behaviours Sensitivity to fluctuation/change http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 4

Technological solutions for neurodegeneration • • • Capitalising on increasing tech use in older

Technological solutions for neurodegeneration • • • Capitalising on increasing tech use in older adults Provision of detailed data – tailored for clinician/patient Efficiency Cost effectiveness – increasingly stretched healthcare resources Convenience Psychological burden –confrontation with symptoms/disease progression (test 'failure'; reflecting on difficulties) http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 5

Clinical snapshots: motor and non-motor symptoms http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 6

Clinical snapshots: motor and non-motor symptoms http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 6

Clinical snapshots: mood http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 7

Clinical snapshots: mood http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 7

Methods • Mapping the landscape • • Catalogue current research in ND Identify synergies;

Methods • Mapping the landscape • • Catalogue current research in ND Identify synergies; cross-cutting themes • Developing a roadmap • • Sharing of data and resources Opportunities for collaboration New tools and new applications Ongoing communication/consultation http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 8

Outputs • White paper: landscape/roadmap • Integrated research community • Web resource • Newsletter

Outputs • White paper: landscape/roadmap • Integrated research community • Web resource • Newsletter • Seminars • Workshops …continued partnerships http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 9

Ce. HRes Roadmap http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 10

Ce. HRes Roadmap http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 10

Landscape development Surveying and cataloguing existing or potential applications for ND across schools Identifying:

Landscape development Surveying and cataloguing existing or potential applications for ND across schools Identifying: • Themes • Synergies/overlaps • Gaps • Opportunities • Challenges http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 11

Landscape development • Bringing together: • Technologists with health researchers • Technologists with technologists

Landscape development • Bringing together: • Technologists with health researchers • Technologists with technologists • Technologists with clinicians • Identifying contributors: • 9 schools across FSE • FBMH http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 12

Landscape development Reaching out to technologists across FSE • Contacting schools • ‘Pop-up’ information

Landscape development Reaching out to technologists across FSE • Contacting schools • ‘Pop-up’ information sessions • Follow-up (drop-in) sessions Information gathering • Workshops: 1) Health + Tech: 31 Jan -1 Feb, Shrigley Hall Hotel 2) Tech + Tech: 7 -8 March, MOSI 3) All – Roadmap development: TBC • Interviews http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 13

Landscape development Pop-up sessions • • February 2017 In-school advertising Presentations, Q&A Informal follow-up

Landscape development Pop-up sessions • • February 2017 In-school advertising Presentations, Q&A Informal follow-up • Identification of school representatives http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 14

Landscape development (1) Current projects in ND • Background /objectives • Partners/collaborators • Development/methods

Landscape development (1) Current projects in ND • Background /objectives • Partners/collaborators • Development/methods • Data • Results/interpretation • Next steps http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch Interview topics Challenges • Technical/resources • Ethics/regulatory • Recruitment/compliance • Interpretation • Validation (2) Potential projects • Re-purposing • Technologies in development • Potential collaborators? • Input needed? 15

Connecting technological capability and clinical need Tech: Clinical: Objective/quantitative measurement Diagnosis Continuous/frequent data collection

Connecting technological capability and clinical need Tech: Clinical: Objective/quantitative measurement Diagnosis Continuous/frequent data collection Heterogeneous data Algorithms/models Monitoring Treatment Solutions: Communication Biomarker identification Profiling/stratification Individualised treatment/Precision medicine Cost-effective interventions Living well http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 16

Project examples Monitoring in Parkinson’s disease and dementia Collaborative projects (FSE/FBMH): • Symptom Knowledge

Project examples Monitoring in Parkinson’s disease and dementia Collaborative projects (FSE/FBMH): • Symptom Knowledge in Parkinson’s (SKIP) • • • PI: Ellen Poliakoff (Manchester) Objective: monitor symptoms across multiple domains in Parkinson’s Software Architecture for Mental Health Self. Management (SAMS) • • PI: Peter Sawyer (Lancaster) Objective: detect early signs of cognitive decline http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 17

Examples: Parkinson’s disease and Dementia Parkinson’s Dementia Constructs measured Cognition, speech, social, motor Cognition

Examples: Parkinson’s disease and Dementia Parkinson’s Dementia Constructs measured Cognition, speech, social, motor Cognition (memory, planning…); functional behaviour Feasibility/ Proof of concept Directed tasks (laptop) x 30 days – detection of fluctuations Video diary Focus group Semi-directed tasks –crosssectional; group differentiation (MCI/mild AD vs control) Expert consultation Continuous monitoring -passive data collection -proxy measures -validation against clinical Smartphone data: physical activity, communications, location, environment, web/ interactions Daily home PC use: mouse/keyboard, operating system, web/email, text analysis -e. g. Addenbrooke’s Cognitive -e. g. UPDRS Examination http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 18

Parkinson’s disease http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 19

Parkinson’s disease http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 19

Parkinson’s disease http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 20

Parkinson’s disease http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 20

Dementia Data mining Layer II SAMS participant Raw data Layer III Layer IV http:

Dementia Data mining Layer II SAMS participant Raw data Layer III Layer IV http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch Raw text Computer-use behaviours Text mining Cognitive/ functional change? 21

Dementia Keystrokes/min 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Keyboard behaviour HC MCI/AD

Dementia Keystrokes/min 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Keyboard behaviour HC MCI/AD Characters/min 150 Characters/min (Typing task) 250 200 150 r =. 598, n = 41, p <. 001* 100 50 100 0 0 50 0 HC http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch MCI/AD 10 20 30 40 50 Keystrokes/min (Total experiment) 60 70 r =. 592, n = 41, p <. 001* 22

Synergies and Challenges Proof of concept -Constructs to measure -Cross-sectional analysis -User/expert consultation Identification

Synergies and Challenges Proof of concept -Constructs to measure -Cross-sectional analysis -User/expert consultation Identification of suitable proxies Retention/ compliance Feasibility -Small-scale data collection -Patterns/fluctuations Recruitment Longitudinal data collection -Larger sample size -Change detection Acceptability 23 http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch

Synergies and Challenges Raw data -GPS -Web -Sensor -Bluetooth -Keyboard/mouse Hardware/ software limitations Large

Synergies and Challenges Raw data -GPS -Web -Sensor -Bluetooth -Keyboard/mouse Hardware/ software limitations Large volumes of data http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch Analysis -Identifying metrics -Patterns -Variation Combining data sources Inferring complex behaviours Interpretation -Disease progression -Functional decline -Individual profiles Correlating with clinical measures Missing data 24

Overlaps and themes • Unobtrusive monitoring – everyday activity • Utilising off-the shelf devices/apps

Overlaps and themes • Unobtrusive monitoring – everyday activity • Utilising off-the shelf devices/apps • Home PC use • Smartphones – GPS, bluetooth… • • Heterogeneous data Pattern identification and interpretation Change detection Validation/mapping to clinical measures http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 25

Future opportunities and challenges Next steps: • • SKIP – 12 month longitudinal study

Future opportunities and challenges Next steps: • • SKIP – 12 month longitudinal study planned SAMS – longitudinal data analysis under way Opportunities: • • Application to other conditions? Combining methods - PC use and sensors? – cognitive, physical and social domains Challenges: • • Continued collaboration Implementation pathway http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 26

Importance of collaborative working • Appropriate/timely research questions • Combined expertise needed to analyse/interpret

Importance of collaborative working • Appropriate/timely research questions • Combined expertise needed to analyse/interpret data • User/patient input needed • Feasibility • Acceptability • Consultation at every stage • E. g. SKIP focus group: -patients valued passive monitoring -level of feedback important http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 27

Get in touch… http: //www. informatics. manchester. ac. uk/ neurodegenerative-diseases-platformtechnology/ http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch

Get in touch… http: //www. informatics. manchester. ac. uk/ neurodegenerative-diseases-platformtechnology/ http: //bit. do/Neuro. D-PT-Launch 28

Acknowledgements Sam Couth Julio Vega Gemma Stringer SAMS and SKIP study teams

Acknowledgements Sam Couth Julio Vega Gemma Stringer SAMS and SKIP study teams

Questions? Jude Bek Judith. bek@manchester. ac. uk

Questions? Jude Bek Judith. bek@manchester. ac. uk