PIRO Coral Reef Ecosystem Management Needs Gerry Davis

  • Slides: 10
Download presentation
PIRO Coral Reef Ecosystem Management Needs Gerry Davis, PIRO Habitat ARA PIFSC External Review

PIRO Coral Reef Ecosystem Management Needs Gerry Davis, PIRO Habitat ARA PIFSC External Review April 2016

Management Uses of PIFSC Data (to date) • Showed resource status linkage to human

Management Uses of PIFSC Data (to date) • Showed resource status linkage to human population densities (Pacific-wide ecosystem monitoring) • Characterized reef resources for PMNM management planning (archipelagic RAMP cruise reports) • Helped prioritize sites for possible management (larval transport information) • Identified presence of invasive species (ARMS genetic analysis) • Helped guide EFH reviews and refine HAPC (nearshore reef maps) • Informed adaptive management and impacts of

Challenges to Using PIFSC Data for Management • Spatial-scale of RAMP data is often

Challenges to Using PIFSC Data for Management • Spatial-scale of RAMP data is often too broad for use in EFH or ESA consultations • Data availability can be a challenge • PIFSC and PIRO have built coral reef programs around different mandates

Data PIRO Needs for Management 1) Detailed assessments at local priority sites i. e.

Data PIRO Needs for Management 1) Detailed assessments at local priority sites i. e. , high development potential

Data PIRO Needs for Management 2) Data to inform adaptive management options and causality

Data PIRO Needs for Management 2) Data to inform adaptive management options and causality

Data PIRO Needs for Management 3 a) Data to understand major threats to local

Data PIRO Needs for Management 3 a) Data to understand major threats to local coral reefs e. g. , watershed level EFH and ESA-species • Land-based sedimentation/ storm-water/ pollution impacts

Data PIRO Needs for Management 3 b) Data to understand major threats to local

Data PIRO Needs for Management 3 b) Data to understand major threats to local coral reefs e. g. , watershed level EFH and ESA-species • Land-based sedimentation/ pollution • Fishing impacts to coral reef ecosystems

Data PIRO Needs for Management 3 c) Data to understand major threats to local

Data PIRO Needs for Management 3 c) Data to understand major threats to local coral reefs e. g. , watershed level EFH and ESA-species • Land-based sedimentation/ pollution • Fishing impacts to coral reef ecosystems • Climate impacts to coral reef ecosystems

Possible Priority Management Sites (Focus Areas) Am. Samoa: • Fagaalu watershed • Nuuuli •

Possible Priority Management Sites (Focus Areas) Am. Samoa: • Fagaalu watershed • Nuuuli • Pago Harbor • Leone • Vatia Guam: • Apra Harbor • Manell-Gues watershed/Cocos Lagoon • Tumon Bay Hawaii: • State of Hawaii Harbors • West Hawaii • South/West Oahu • West Maui (Kahekilli) CNMI: • Saipan Lagoon • Lao Bay • Garapan Pacific I. Marine National • Talakhaya, Rota Monuments: • CNMI (Maug, Uracas, Asuncion • Tinian Harbor • CNMI DOD training areas)

Conclusion and Recommendations • PIFSC is a willing and interested partner • However- historically

Conclusion and Recommendations • PIFSC is a willing and interested partner • However- historically constrained by funding • PIFSC-CREP data has been useful to management in a general way • Priority needs for ecosystem science to support management: Studies to: 1) Understand local sites of high potential impacts 2) Inform adaptive management 3) Understand the major threats • Science based tools for improving management success • Data to measure management action results