PIPII WBS 121 3 121 4 121 5
PIP-II WBS 121. 3 121. 4 121. 5 Summary Paul Derwent, Fernanda Garcia, Ioanis Kourbanis Risk Workshop 12, 13 -Jul-2018 In partnership with: India/DAE Italy/INFN UK/STFC France/CEA/Irfu, CNRS/IN 2 P 3
WBS 121. 3 Critical Technology Elements (CTEs) • Resonance Control – Beyond state of the art in the Pulsed RF case – 5 cavity and CM types • Laser Profile Monitor – Beyond state of the art in low power modulated version • Machine Protection System – Definition of requirements • Electronic systems – Software, firmware, platforms, communications – Definition of requirements perspective • Linac-Booster Energy match – Phase stability, power supply stability – Cost & schedule perspective, Definitions of requirements perspective 2
3
WBS 121. 5 Critical Technology Elements (CTEs) • The Main Injector RF cavities are expected to operate under new conditions. – Plan to test one upgraded cavity under operating conditions. • The new Recycler RF cavities are expected to operate CW (new operating condition). – Plan to build a prototype 4
Identification of ‘new’ risks • Personnel: succession planning, availability – in PM section, do we want to call out specific areas at lower levels? • Booster injection will require a much longer injection time (~300 turns or. 55 msec) during which the Booster field needs to be kept constant. (121. 5) – “If the Booster correctors do not have enough current, then we will need to modify the Booster PS to keep the Booster field constant during the injection time ($$). ” • Commissioning and SRF Damage – Vacuum incidents throughout the linac – Beam loss throughout the linac • QPM Performance 5
Modified Risks • Resonance control and field regulation – With change to CW RF operation, need to revise this risk – Have to balance register entry and MC application • QPM calculations and performance – Closed ! Which made us create a new one • MEBT Kickers and Vacuum – Lower probability and impacts due to PIP 2 IT 6
Takeaway • The discussions held were insightful and productive – Identified risks that should be addressed by the team to move forward • Some of them were added but not all – Magnetization of cryomodules and sub-components during the installation of magnets transported nearby cryomodule (mushield) – Inadequate power panels and/or location that requires to be added/re-worked – cost increase during building outfitting • Because of time limitation, not enough discussion about mitigation strategies for risks • Cost is mainly driven by labor in this system – – Sustainability of people and expertise inside the project is a common theme across the project 7
Next Steps • Go over the risk registry and revise the description, probabilities and impacts – Regular visits to the register and consideration of the information – ‘knew’ that needed updating coming into the workshop • Propose new risks for consideration, especially in the building infrastructure, installation and commissioning • Obtain approvals and incorporate them into an activity in P 6 schedule – How is the project going to do this formally? • Pip 2 -docdb #163 Risk Management Plan • Risk Management Board, follow Laboratory Risk Management Procedure 8
- Slides: 8