PIN Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders Developments Dutch PIN Community
PIN Platform Informatiemodel Netbeheerders Developments Dutch PIN Community for the CIM user group meeting Prague 2011 Date: 11 May 2001 Richard Uijen (Tenne. T) richard. uijen at tennet. eu
Subjects PIN • Who are we? • Developments 2011 • Our ambitions for 2011 • CIM governance 2 25 oktober
PIN membership and associations PIN Goal 2010 Milan • 5 Organizations 2011 Prague • 7 Organizations Talks with: 3 25 oktober
Subjects PIN • Who are we? • Developments 2011 • Our ambitions for 2011 • CIM governance 4 25 oktober
Developments 2011 (1/2) Covering vision, standards, governance National Re-use SECTOR Vision PIN Standards Regulators Taskforce Intelligent Grids Main issue Standards & Interoperability Together, Dutch Grid Operators Connect Share Regional EU Taskforce SG International Organize & prioritize Make & harmonize FERC Regulate 5 25 oktober
Developments 2011 (2/2) PIN • 2010 -07 Final document Dutch TF Smart Grid • 2011 -01 Final public consultation document Dutch TF Smart Grid – PIN input was used for future steps on standards and interoperability Taskforce Intelligent Grids • 2011 -02/06 Agentschap. NL is forming SG platform. Forseen tasks: – Dutch Conceptual model. (similar to NIST) – Selection criteria for standards and determine priorities – Shortlist of relevant standards for the Netherlands – Ensuring contribution on international standards (Based on comply or explain on int. standards and best practices) • DSO’s and TSO are no competitors, we seek synergy 6 25 oktober
Subjects PIN • Who are we? • Developments 2011 • Our ambitions for 2011 • CIM governance 7 25 oktober
Our ambitions for 2011 PIN Support the Dutch SG platform on: • Delivering a set of standards with core and high relevance for the Netherlands (incl. E-Govermental standards) • Deliver a set of business issues which can be supported by those standards. Examples of data exchange: • between gridoperator and regulator (CODATA) • between TSO an DSO • between DSO and Serviceproviders (= Project DURF digital exchange of revision data of grid components and topology) • Delivering a set of selection-criteria for adopting standards • Delivering a development-proces description that can be used by the dutch grid operators. 8 25 oktober
Subjects PIN • Who are we? • Developments 2011 • Our ambitions for 2011 • CIM governance 9 25 oktober
CIM Governance (1/4) PIN Applying CIM… Before: Project Non-standard interface Time, knowledge and other constraints Current: Project Architecture: use standard Time, knowledge and other constraints Non-standard interface Desired: Project Architecture: use standard Knowledge available Standards reused Standardized interface 10 25 oktober
CIM Governance (2/4) Common Information Model Managed by PIN Experts organized Formal representation International standardization IEC CIM model manager CIMug IEC 57 Regional standardization Regional CIM Profile Regional profile manager ENTSO-E Data expert group ENTSO-E SDC/SOC/MC National standardization National CIM profiles National model manager PIN NEC 57 (NEN working group) Local standardization Local CIM Local data manager Local CIM experts Participation in groups * CIM represents CIM and other standards like 61850, BAG (Dutch), GBKN (Dutch), KVK (Dutch), etc. 11 25 oktober
CIM Governance (3/4) PIN The idea… PIN Subject representative zed ani e Org wledg kno Organized knowledge TC 57 National standardization committee Companies 12 25 oktober
CIM Governance (4/4) PIN Challenges to the PIN Group and to company standardization coordinators: - How to unite the CIM (and other standards) knowledge in a kind of competence center? How do you organize that? - How to ascertain that CIM interpretations are the same within all parts of the company / group of companies? - How to organize business and IT stakeholders around the CIM? How do you prevent ‘islands’ to be formed? I would like to come back from Prague with a set of working (or best) practices. 13 25 oktober
- Slides: 13