PERSONALIZED RESEARCH MENTORSHIP TEAM SURVEY Survey Data Summary

PERSONALIZED RESEARCH MENTORSHIP TEAM SURVEY Survey Data Summary and Highlights

1. New Faculty Survey • 129 surveys were sent to new faculty • 69 surveys were completed (53. 5% response rate)

0 2 1 2 New Faculty 1 3 8 6 Veterinary Medicine School of Environment and Sustain. . . Pharmacy and Nutrition Nursing 3 Medicine 4 Library Law 2 1 Kinesiology 4 Global Institute for Food security 8 Engineering 6 Edwards School of Business 8 Education 16 Dentistry 18 Arts and Science 10 Agriculture and Bioresources Please indicate your Department/College/School/Research Unit 16 14 12 7 4 2

Has a Personalized Research Mentorship Team been formed for you since you joined our University? 60. 0% 50. 0% 40. 0% 30. 0% 56. 5% 43. 5% 20. 0% 10. 0% Yes No New Faculty

On a scale from 1 to 10, where one means extremely negative and ten means extremely positive, please rate your overall experience of the Personalized Research Mentorship team. 25. 0% 20. 0% 15. 0% 10. 0% 20. 5% 17. 9% 15. 4% 17. 9% 20. 5% 5. 0% 0. 0% 1 Extremely negative 2. 6% 2 2. 6% 3 2. 6% 0. 0% 4 5 6 New Faculty 7 8 9 10 Extremely positive

Is your Personalized Research Mentorship Team currently active? 80. 0% 70. 0% 60. 0% 50. 0% 40. 0% 79. 5% 30. 0% 20. 0% 17. 9% 10. 0% Yes No New Faculty

Please describe how often you met with your Personalized Research Mentorship Team. 16 14 12 10 15 8 11 6 4 2 0 5 0 Never Annually 2 or more times a year New Faculty As needed / Informally

ng pi lo ve De co ur yo or sf pl an ng pi lo ve liz n io at s se ip rs h kn es ea lly na ts os al op pr er cia m m cs tio en ud st s es al ly oc pr in te rn a hi et nd ly a al te ua ra d w vie re gl oc m ra w en to m f. S Uo 25. 6% De gg tin io n at gn kin or tw al pr og nd nd ga in sa th kin or tw Ne rc h ea es rr rn te in At tra c e th ou ng st re ch te a ns io at ct pe ol ho 35. 9% 33. 3% Ne in g et pl m gy tin rc h ea es rr nd ar ou e th /S c 43. 6% 41. 0% Co en pl em ou e nc ex of ge 48. 7% Im gy ss in h tu re ol le /C pt De 20. 0% ui da rc ea es cu l ur 56. 4% As se gg in gr ch an pl yo 10. 0% vid tin h of 30. 0% Pr o ar se re ea rc re s tu re cu l 0. 0% Se t e th ur yo ch ar se re ng pi e th lo ve di ng an rs t de Un De di ng an st Has the Personalized Research Mentorship Team been beneficial to you in any of the following ways? (Select all that apply) 70. 0% 60. 0% 50. 0% 40. 0% 69. 2% 17. 9% 15. 4% 12. 8% 2. 6%

Did you feel more supported knowing your Associate Dean Research and/or Department Head was a part of your Personalized Research Mentorship Team? 80. 0% 70. 0% 60. 0% 50. 0% 40. 0% 74. 2% 30. 0% 20. 0% 10. 0% 9. 7% 16. 1% 0. 0% Yes No New Faculty ADR/DH was not part of the PRMT

Question only asked to faculty who no longer had an active PRMT: When your Personalized Research Mentorship Team was active, were the Research Mentor(s) who were a part of your team supportive? 90. 0% 80. 0% 70. 0% 60. 0% 50. 0% 85. 7% 40. 0% 30. 0% 20. 0% 14. 3% 10. 0% Yes No New Faculty

Please explain why a Personalized Research Mentorship Team has not been formed for you since joining the University of Saskatchewan. They were unsure They were still waiting to be contacted They did not feel they needed a PRMT They were not aware of the PRMT program Their mentorship team development was in progress but not yet fully formed • Their College did not support or value mentorship • • •

Do you have other mentoring support programs that you currently rely on (not including the University Personalized Research Mentorship Team)? 70. 0% 60. 0% 50. 0% 40. 0% 65. 2% 30. 0% 20. 0% 34. 8% 10. 0% Yes No New Faculty

Please describe the mentorship you are being given (outside of the Uof. S Personalized Research Mentorship Program) and how it is working. 16 14 12 10 15 8 6 4 2 2 4 3 0 Programs developed by the Self-initiated programs College/Department Research groups Other

Do you have access to the level of research mentorship expertise required for your research program? 45. 0% 40. 0% 35. 0% 30. 0% 25. 0% 42. 0% 20. 0% 29. 0% 15. 0% 10. 0% 15. 9% 5. 0% 8. 7% 4. 3% 0. 0% Always Most of the About half the time New Faculty Sometimes Never

2. Associate Deans Research and Department Head Survey • 60 surveys were sent to ADRs and DHs • 22 surveys were completed (36. 7% response rate) No New Faculty Surveys Sent 18 42 Surveys Completed 5 17 Response Rate 27. 8% 40. 5%

Please indicate your Department/College/School/Research Unit Agriculture and Bioresources n=2 Arts and Science n=10 Edwards School of Business n=2 Engineering n=1 Medicine n=3 Veterinary Medicine n=3 Other n=1 Total n=22

Have you been part of the Personalized Research Mentorship Team meetings for any of your new faculty members named in your invitation email? 60. 0% 50. 0% 40. 0% 30. 0% 20. 0% 59. 1% 40. 9% 10. 0% Yes No ADRs/DHs

On a scale from 1 to 10, where one means extremely negative and ten means extremely positive, please rate your overall experience of the Personalized Research Mentorship team. 60. 0% 50. 0% 40. 0% 33. 3% 30. 0% 22. 2% 20. 0% 10. 0% 1 Extremely negative 17. 9% 0. 0% 2. 6% 2 3 15. 4% 20. 5% 17. 9% 20. 5% 2. 6% 0. 0% 4 11. 1% 0. 0% 5 New Faculty 6 ADRs/DHs 7 8 9 10 Extremely positive

gg tin te ua en ud ts 11. 1% st n io at os al op liz er cia m m s es al ly io n al ly oc pr pr w at er n cs hi et in t vie re ra d co ur yo or sf pl an ng At tra c ng pi lo ve pi lo al rn te in nd gl oc kin or s se kn es ea 44. 4% De ve e th ly a al io n at w m ra og pr nd sa th f. S Uo ip sh l 44. 4% De in g et pl m tw Ne rc h ea es rr e th an pl of to r en m oo ge /S ch le ol /C pt 66. 7% Co gn kin or tw Ne ou gy ng h ea rc tu re cu l re s st re ur yo rc h ea es rr tin en pl em ou ng pi ch d an De 30. 0% Im gy ss in lo ve ng hi ns ur yo 20. 0% As se ar se re ac te of io at ct pe ex re 10. 0% e th nd ou ar h rc ltu cu 50. 0% De di ng an rs t e nc ui da ea es gr ar ch se re 0. 0% de gg in vid tin e th 40. 0% Un Pr o Se t in g nd Has the Personalized Research Mentorship Team been beneficial to your new faculty member(s) in any of the following ways? (Select all that apply) 80. 0% 70. 0% 60. 0% 77. 8% 66. 7% 55. 6% 44. 4% 22. 2% 11. 1% 0. 0%

Are you using other mentorship methods to support your faculty, other than the use of the University Personalized Research Mentorship Teams? 120. 0% 53. 8% 100. 0% 80. 0% 60. 0% 46. 2% 65. 2% 40. 0% 20. 0% 34. 8% 0. 0% Yes No New Faculty ADRs/DHs

Please share a description of the other mentorship methods you are using to support your faculty (besides the University Personalized Research Mentorship Team model). • Informal check in's with faculty. • My department makes expectations clear. We are very collegial with respect to discussing how best to go about establishing a research program, and we have a highly organized graduate program that includes an orientation for new graduate students (which lessens the pressure on a new faculty member to establish an appropriate environment. We work in instructional committees to discuss teaching. We have monthly department meetings. There has been no further need for mentorship. • At the department level each new faculty is assigned a mentor mainly to help with preparing grant proposals. • We have a single mentor, regular meetings with Department Head, constant Faculty Research Workshops, writing teams within the Department. In some ways, we view the whole Department as a Personalized Research Mentorship Team. In other ways, we encourage new faculty to develop their own group of informal mentors around research and teaching. • I ensure that our new faculty member is well connected to the strongest researchers for advice. • College mentorship program

Overall, do your new faculty member(s) have access to the level of research mentorship expertise required for their research program? 120. 0% 100. 0% 80. 0% 63. 6% 60. 0% 40. 0% 13. 6% 18. 2% 20. 0% 42. 0% 15. 9% 29. 0% 4. 3% 0. 0% Always 4. 5% Most of the time About half the Sometimes time New Faculty ADRs/DHs 0. 0% 8. 7% Never