Personality 1 2 Theories Todays Objectives By the

Personality 1. 2 Theories

Today’s Objectives • By the end of the session all learners will have: o Developed own interpretation of trait theory through discussions in small groups based around Eysenck’s theory o Identified at least 5 evaluation points of theory o Considered the application of theory to the area of sport o Developed own interpretation of the relevance the measure of personality and theory has to sport using the key study of Kroll & Crenshaw ~ small group discussion to support own interpretation o Identified at least 5 evaluation points of the key study o Considered the application of personality to the area of sport drawing on all 3 studies • Some learners will have: o Lead a discussion in small groups o Contributed small groups ideas to class discussion o Identified more than 5 evaluation points

Who is Eysenck? ? ! • Primarily based on physiology and genetics • Eysenck was a behaviourist ~ learned habits important • Considers personality differences as growing out of our genetic inheritance • Primarily interested in what is usually called temperament ~ the aspect of our personalities that is genetically based, inborn, there from birth or even before. • Does not mean that a temperament theory says we don't also have aspects of our personality that are learned, Eysenck focused on "nature, " and left "nurture" to other theorists

Eysenck ~ Background • Two dimensions of a personality Extroversion (positive, how outgoing or self contained a person is) Neuroticism (negative, stable or unstable a person is) • Later added a third… Psychoticism (aggression, mental instability)

Background cont. • Based on factor analysis • Developed a hierarchical taxonomy Superfactors ~ Dimensions of extroversion, neuroticism, psychoticism Factors ~ that you a sociable Habits ~ preferring to revise with peers Behaviour ~ revising for an exam

Biological basis of Eysenck’s Trait Theory • Read the booklets and make notes in relation to the biological basis of theory • Main points …. • RAS monitors arousal o Extrovert = under aroused, gets bored, seeks stimulation to maintain good level of activation o Louder, more outgoing, attention seeking, lack concentration o Opposite for introverted • ANS responds to emotion- producing stimuli o Neurotic = rapid and strong response to stress o Low anxiety, anxious, moody, restless, fight or flight in small stressful situations – easily upset o Opposite for stable • Testosterone affects psychoticism ~ justifying aggression and psychotic episodes

Eysenck’s Trait Theory In small groups, consider what sports you may find specific individuals with 1 of the 4 personality traits

Evaluation of the Theory • What are some strengths to this theory? o Reliable? o Valid? • What are some weaknesses? o Useful? o Generalizable?

Are you a Psychopath? ? ? ! This is a story about a girl. While at the funeral of her own mother, she met a guy whom she did not know. She thought this guy was amazing, so much the dream guy that she was searching for that she fell in love with him immediately. However, she never asked for his name or number and afterward could not find anyone who knew who he was. A few days later the girl killed her own sister. Question: Why did she kill her sister?

Answer… If the first answer that springs to your mind is some variation of jealousy and revenge – she discovers her sister has been seeing the man behind her back – then you are in the clear. But if your first response to this puzzle is "because she was hoping the man would turn up to her sister's funeral as well", then by some accounts you have the qualities that might qualify you to be a coldblooded killer! Same qualities: an absence of emotion in decision making, a cold focus on outcomes, an extremely ruthless and egocentric logic – which tend to show up in disproportionate degrees in all those individuals. So…. If you answered this correctly, you think like a psychopath!!

1. 3 Relevance • Are some personalities more likely to be successful in sport that others? o Why? • Are some more suited to certain sports than others? o Why? ? ? ? Introverts ~ solo sports (long distance running) ? ? ? Extroverts ~ high energy (rugby)

• One theory is that there are people that are naturally athletic o Credulous – sceptical argument = the debate that the impact of personality has on sports performance • Credulous = athletic performance CAN be predicted from personality / personality traits • Sceptical = athletic performance CAN NOT be predicted from personality profiles • Research that supports this …. o Cox (2000) personality is ONE factor that contributes to success o Schurr et al. (1997), Hardman (1973), Cooper (1969) athletes DO have different personalities than non-athletes (e. g independent and less anxious, more self confidence) o What came first though? ? !!! o Williams and Parkin (1980) used Cattell’s 16 PF compared personality profiles of hockey players ~ clear distinction between different levels of players (eg. Club, international and national etc)

Key Study ~ Kroll & Crenshaw • Read study and make notes / annotate • Aim ~ comparison of personality profiles using the 16 F o Different sports where competitors are at established levels of achievement • Design ~ independent measures ~ 4 sports • Participants ~ 387 athletes, regional or national, wide area of middle geographical section of • Procedure ~ 16 PF, MMPI administered. Athletic quality controlled by selecting those described • America, skills were excellent / superior as excellent / superior. Statistical analysis used to determine whether groups could be compared based on profile as a whole or individual components Results ~ sig diff between groups • Using the 16 PF from last lesson, use the table to identify what the major contributing factors were for the groups. Football Wrestling Similar Football Gymnastic s Sig H C L Q 2 Football Karate Sig H L G Q 2 Wrestling Gymnastic s Sig H B Q 1 Q 2 Wrestling Karate Sig Q 2 Q 4 N G Gymnastics Karate Sig diff Q 4 G F B

Evaluate …. • Using the evaluation tool I developed for you, evaluate the study…. Reliability Ethnocentrism Generalizability Usefulness Nature vs Nurture Validity

Evaluation • Attempts to compare personalities in different sports are sparse and that there was a lack of defined samples for each sport • Not be assumed that samples truly represent the sports studied • American sports studied • Not equal group sizes

Personality Tests and predictions • http: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=IFL 6 RRNu. NKc • http: //www. dailymail. co. uk/sciencetech/article-2515507/How. Facebook-status-updates-reveal-youre-PSYCHOPATH. html • HOMEWORK ~ read over all 3 studies ensuring you understand all relevant points o Ensure you have developed evaluation points for all o For further info on personality there is a good program that is in parts on you tube ~ child of our time – personality. I will put the link on the Blog. Is useful to help understanding but remember you need to be linking it to the area of sport in preparation for the exam

Today we have…. • All learners have: o Developed own interpretation of trait theory through discussions in small groups based around Eysenck’s theory o Identified at least 5 evaluation points of theory o Considered the application of theory to the area of sport o Developed own interpretation of the relevance the measure of personality and theory has to sport using the key study of Kroll & Crenshaw ~ small group discussion to support own interpretation o Identified at least 5 evaluation points of the key study o Considered the application of personality to the area of sport drawing on all 3 studies • Some learners have: o Lead a discussion in small groups o Contributed small groups ideas to class discussion o Identified more than 5 evaluation points