Personalised Progressive Assessment Steve Rackley Director of Geography

  • Slides: 14
Download presentation
Personalised & Progressive Assessment Steve Rackley Director of Geography, Framingham Earl High School Associate

Personalised & Progressive Assessment Steve Rackley Director of Geography, Framingham Earl High School Associate Tutor, University of East Anglia @fehs_geog Digital handout: goo. gl/2 v. R 5 u. Y #gaconf 17

Key Geography Aspects – 7 strands, progress ‘ladder’ approach to assessment Language Processes (Human

Key Geography Aspects – 7 strands, progress ‘ladder’ approach to assessment Language Processes (Human & Physical) Skills Conflict Decision Making Sustainability Interdependence

UNDERPINNING COMMON OR ‘BASE’ CRITERIA BASELINE (all 7) TERMLYSUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT TERMLYASSESSMENT TERMLYSUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SUMMATIVE

UNDERPINNING COMMON OR ‘BASE’ CRITERIA BASELINE (all 7) TERMLYSUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT TERMLYASSESSMENT TERMLYSUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT INCREASING CHALLENGE Up to 4 strands assessed on ladder-based criteria Overlapping assessed strands Continuous “light-touch” formative assessment KS 3 ENTRY YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 KS 3 EXIT NB: 7 strands of assessment in FEHS KS 3 Geog – averaged only for AP reporting

Personalisation

Personalisation

Personalisation

Personalisation

Personalisation

Personalisation

Personalisation

Personalisation

Personalisation

Personalisation

Assessment Folders

Assessment Folders

Af. L and Feedback – Visual aid

Af. L and Feedback – Visual aid

Thoughts • Do you need to be a ‘spreadsheet Steve’ to make this effective?

Thoughts • Do you need to be a ‘spreadsheet Steve’ to make this effective? • Does it still rely too much on empirical measurements (is it just level marking in disguise? ) • Is it worth the front-loading (e. g. personalised mail-merged assessments etc)? • Designed and rolled out before GCSE reforms – does it still fit? • Your thoughts/questions/ideas?