Performance of MRPC telescopes of the EEE Project

  • Slides: 29
Download presentation
Performance of MRPC telescopes of the EEE Project E. Bossini, C. Cicalò, D. De

Performance of MRPC telescopes of the EEE Project E. Bossini, C. Cicalò, D. De Gruttola, I. Gnesi, M. Garbini, S. Grazzi, M. P. Panetta 08/02/2017 EEE meeting

Status mee ting ü time resolution ² time slewing correction ² comparison between old

Status mee ting ü time resolution ² time slewing correction ² comparison between old and new analyzer 30 N o v 20 16 ü spatial resolution ² time slewing correction ² comparison between old and new analyzer ü beta ditributions for all telescopes (ongoing, not shown here) ü trending for HV and currents (ongoing, not shown here) ü duty cycle by trending the rate (ongoing, not shown here) ü writing (well advanced, not shown here) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 2

Time Over Threshold ü strategy for the time slewing correction ü understand all contributions

Time Over Threshold ü strategy for the time slewing correction ü understand all contributions 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 3

TOT ü TOT vs time to get time slewing corrections ü next ² use

TOT ü TOT vs time to get time slewing corrections ü next ² use the mean of distribution bin by bin (at the moment we use the mean of the profile) ² clarify possible reflections (peaks in the TOT distribution) ² apply time slewing correction and measure again the time resolution ² apply correction on single signals (left and right) rather than to the mean of TOT in a chamber 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 4

TOT ü TOT vs time to get time slewing corrections ü next ² use

TOT ü TOT vs time to get time slewing corrections ü next ² use the mean of distribution bin by bin (at the moment we use the mean of the profile) ² clarify possible reflections (peaks in the TOT distribution) ² apply time slewing correction and measure again the time resolution ² apply correction on single signals (left and right) rather than to the mean of TOT in a chamber 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 5

TOT ü TOT distributions (secondary peaks are visible signal reflections) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 6

TOT ü TOT distributions (secondary peaks are visible signal reflections) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 6

TOT ü TOT distributions (secondary peaks are visible signal reflections) ü TOT vs strip

TOT ü TOT distributions (secondary peaks are visible signal reflections) ü TOT vs strip show no dependence on the strip ü is it correct to use the mean of TOTL and TOTR? mee ting 30 N o v 20 16 ü it should work, but taking reflections into account (NINO and electronic chain) the correction should be done on single signals (left and right) check has been done (see next slides) ü time slewing correction has been done by using: ² the mean of TOTL and TOTR ² TOTL and TOTR for t. L and t. R respectively ² the min value between TOTL and TOTR (in order not to assign a wrong TOT, due to reflections) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 7

mean TOT associated to hit time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 8

mean TOT associated to hit time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 8

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 signal reflections (entries out of the

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 signal reflections (entries out of the diagonal) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 9

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 signal reflections 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 10

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 signal reflections 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 10

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 2 D histogram profile mean(RMS) 08/02/2017

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 2 D histogram profile mean(RMS) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 11

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 12

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 12

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) t = 339 ps c 2<5 t =

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) t = 339 ps c 2<5 t = 236 ps bad correction! 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 13

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting c 2<5 14

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting c 2<5 14

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting c 2<5 15

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting c 2<5 15

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting c 2<5 16

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting c 2<5 16

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) c 2<5 corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) c 2<5 corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 17

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) t = 413 ps c 2<5 t

LECC-01 -2016 -11 -19(2. 5 M events) t = 413 ps c 2<5 t = 216 ps bad correction! 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 18

TOTL and TOTR for t. L and t. R respectively 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 19

TOTL and TOTR for t. L and t. R respectively 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 19

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 right 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 20

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 right 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 20

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 left 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 21

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 left 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 21

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 right corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 right corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 22

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 left corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 left corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 23

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) t = 429 ps c 2<5 t =

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) t = 429 ps c 2<5 t = 216 ps bad correction! 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 24

min value between TOTL and TOTR 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 25

min value between TOTL and TOTR 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 25

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting c 2<5 26

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) 08/02/2017 EEE meeting c 2<5 26

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 27

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) c 2<5 corrected time 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 27

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) t = 239 ps c 2<5 t =

TORI-02 -2016 -01 -21(3 M events) t = 239 ps c 2<5 t = 236 ps no bad correction here, but the resolution still does not improve after time slewing correction 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 28

Summary ü meeting in Rome in person ² many things were understood ² time

Summary ü meeting in Rome in person ² many things were understood ² time slewing correction still not working ² other items to be completed (including writing of the paper) ² another meeting in person soon ² the work should finish in the next weeks ü 3 different approach to apply time slewing correction ü no improvement on the time resolution (to be understood) ü to be done: ² select only events without reflections ² select only vertical tracks crossing the telescope in the center 08/02/2017 EEE meeting 29