Performance of dairy cattle clones and evaluation of

  • Slides: 14
Download presentation
Performance of dairy cattle clones and evaluation of their milk composition Photo courtesy Infigen

Performance of dairy cattle clones and evaluation of their milk composition Photo courtesy Infigen H. Duane Norman*, 1 and Marie K. Walsh 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 20705 -2350, USA 2 Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA *dnorman@aipl. arsusda. gov 301 -504 -8334 Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-1) 2003

Cloning biotechnology l Embryo splitting l Nuclear transfer 0 Embryo 0 Somatic cell ·

Cloning biotechnology l Embryo splitting l Nuclear transfer 0 Embryo 0 Somatic cell · Fetal · Adult Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-2) 2003

Normal performance? l Animal health (developmental issues) l Mitochondrial DNA differences l Genotype identification

Normal performance? l Animal health (developmental issues) l Mitochondrial DNA differences l Genotype identification (bloodtyping) l Genetic merit l Food safety Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-3) 2003

Research studies l Norman, Lawlor, and Wright (2002). Proceedings of 7 th World Congress

Research studies l Norman, Lawlor, and Wright (2002). Proceedings of 7 th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 33, 699 -702. l Norman, Lawlor, and Wright (2003). Journal of Dairy Science (in press). l Walsh, Lucey, Govindasamy-Lucey, et al. (2003). Cloning and Stem Cells 5, 213 -219. Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-4) 2003

U. S. Holstein clone population Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-5) 2003

U. S. Holstein clone population Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-5) 2003

Pedigree merit l Mean genetic merit of parents l Mean genetic superiority (p 0.

Pedigree merit l Mean genetic merit of parents l Mean genetic superiority (p 0. 01) of parents relative to population for same birth year: Trait Milk (kg) Fat (kg) Protein (kg) Embryo split Females Males 186 9 7 Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-6) 254 11 9 Nuclear transfer Females Males 165 10 8 246 10 9 2003

Genetic merit (PTA) – cows Trait Milk (kg) Fat (%) Protein (kg) Protein (%)

Genetic merit (PTA) – cows Trait Milk (kg) Fat (%) Protein (kg) Protein (%) SCS PL (mo) DPR (%) Embryo split Clone Full sibs s -37 -1* 1 2* 0. 02 0 1** 0. 01 3. 08 3. 09 0. 1 0. 2 0. 1 Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-7) *p 0. 01 **p 0. 001 Nuclear transfer Clone Full sibs s -18 9 -3 0 -0. 02 2 2 0. 02 3. 18 3. 15 -0. 6 -0. 4 -0. 2 -0. 1 2003

Genetic merit (PTA) – bulls Trait Milk (kg) Fat (%) Protein (kg) Protein (%)

Genetic merit (PTA) – bulls Trait Milk (kg) Fat (%) Protein (kg) Protein (%) SCS PL (mo) DPR (%) Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-8) Embryo split Clones Full sibs -86 -78 0 1 0. 03 -2 -1 0. 01 3. 2 3. 1 -0. 5 -0. 3 0. 0 0. 2 2003

Mean standardized performance Embryo split Trait Clones Full sibs Milk (kg) 10, 716 11,

Mean standardized performance Embryo split Trait Clones Full sibs Milk (kg) 10, 716 11, 016** Fat (kg) 394 402* Fat (%) 3. 68 3. 65 Protein (kg) 320 329** Protein (%) 2. 99 SCC 3. 1 PL (mo) 25. 7 26. 4 Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-9) *p 0. 01 **p 0. 001 Nuclear transfer Clones Full sibs 10, 456 10, 715 379 389 3. 62 3. 63 326 325 3. 11 3. 03 3. 6 3. 0 23. 1 26. 7 2003

Deviation from contemporaries Embryo split Trait Clones Full sibs Milk (kg) -199 3** Fat

Deviation from contemporaries Embryo split Trait Clones Full sibs Milk (kg) -199 3** Fat (kg) -2 3* Protein (kg) -3 2** Nuclear transfer Clones Full sibs -278 -305 -17 -13 -2 -7 *p 0. 05 **p 0. 01 Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-10) 2003

Milk composition l Traits analyzed: Solids, fatty acid profile, lactose, protein l Nuclear-transfer clone

Milk composition l Traits analyzed: Solids, fatty acid profile, lactose, protein l Nuclear-transfer clone breeds: Brown Swiss, Holstein Jersey l No differences between clones and non-clones for gross chemical composition of milk 0 Slight difference for palmitic acid 0 Mineral content most variable component Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-11) 2003

Milk composition (Holstein) Component Solids (%) Fat (%) Protein (%) Lactose (%) Kaufmann &

Milk composition (Holstein) Component Solids (%) Fat (%) Protein (%) Lactose (%) Kaufmann & U. S. Non- Hagemeister mean Clones clones (1987) (2001) 12. 9 13. 3 … 4. 0 4. 3 4. 1 3. 8 3. 2 3. 1 3. 6 3. 0 5. 0 … Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-12) 2003

Conclusions l U. S. dairy cattle selected for cloning slightly superior genetically to population

Conclusions l U. S. dairy cattle selected for cloning slightly superior genetically to population for yield l No obvious differences between cloned and non -cloned cows 0 Performance 0 Milk produced l No food safety concerns related to milk from cloned cows Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-13) 2003

U. S. Food & Drug Administration “Most clones that survive the perinatal period are

U. S. Food & Drug Administration “Most clones that survive the perinatal period are normal and healthy as determined by physiological measurements, behavior, and veterinary examinations. ” “Edible products from normal, healthy clones or their progeny do not appear to pose increased food consumption risks relative to comparable products from conventional animals. ” Draft Executive Summary of Animal Cloning: A Risk Assessment (2003) Clone risk assessment workshop (HDN-14) 2003