Performance indicators EUTwinning Project Strengthening Public Procurement in
Performance indicators EU-Twinning Project – Strengthening Public Procurement in Serbia Closing Conference Belgrade, 28 November 2012 Lennart Emborg
Performance Indicators Purposes • Improve performance -> improve procurement • Set up performance indicators, in order to: – – – Identify problems and how they develop Guide capacity development Check impact of measures Learning from good experience Self-assessment and target setting
Performance indicators Approach • Bottom-up approach: – Point of departure: The public procurement process – Based on existing data available to PPO – New types of data -> additional indicators
Performance Indicators Based on Existing Data at PPO (I) • Already there: – Ratio of cancelled or nullified procedures – Use of non-competitive procedures – Number of bids in tenders – Ratio of low value procurements
Performance Indicators Based on Existing Data at PPO (II) • Optional: – [Excessive use of a single contractor] – Absence of public notice for invitation to bid – Absence of contract award notice, when the negotiated procedure without prior notice has been applied – Absence of necessary PP-officers
Development Perspective: Additonal performance indicators • Need for existing but external data: – Complaints from bidders – Deficient procurement planning • Need for additional data: – Insufficient reporting of procurement – Correspondence between budgeted/accounted procurement and reported contracts – Inspection of actual procurement
Ratio of tenders with only one bidder
User functionalities Access to the indicators on the PP Portal: 1. Indicators in general 2. Ranking (benchmarking) 3. Self assessment
Access to the indicators on the PP Portal
General access to indicators
Example of output
Ranking
Example of ranking output
Self assessment
Example of self-assessment output
- Slides: 15