Performance Evaluation System PES MCO P 1610 7

MASTER BRIEF SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 CREATED: 12 DEC 2005 ******* ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION

Administrative Summary ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Grade OCC From BMOS Type To Capt GC 19980801 0302

Administrative Summary (cont) ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Grade OCC From BMOS Type To Capt GC 19980801

What is Relative Value? • RV is a numerical representation of how a single

How does RV Work? • • • RS must process at least three reports

Reporting Senior Markings REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini Promote

Reporting Senior Markings (cont) REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini

Section K: Reviewing Officers Comparative Assessment K. REVIEWING OFFICER COMMENTS 1. OBSERVATION: X Sufficient

Reviewing Officer Markings REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS Reviewing Officer Obser Concur Col Spreadlode (Capt GC)

What do the numbers mean? • Relative Value – 90 RV is not the

Questions? https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil 15

Slides: 15

Download presentation

Performance Evaluation System (PES) MCO P 1610. 7 F Headquarters Marine Corps Personnel Management Support Branch Performance Evaluation Section (MMSB-30) Quantico, Virginia https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil

MASTER BRIEF SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 CREATED: 12 DEC 2005 ******* ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION (ORIGINATES FROM MCTFS - CONTACT YOUR ADMIN SECTION FOR CORRECTIONS) ******* NAME MARINE, JOHN S. SSN 123456789 KEY DATE SUMMARY GRADE O 4 RANK MAJ AWARDS DEAF 19890702 TIS PEBD 15 yr. 11 mo. 19890520 AFADBD 19890520 OSCD ACC COMM 19950115 19890520 DOR COMM DOR LDO 19890531 MM NC NA 1 2 1 DOR 19990501 TIG 5 yr. 11 mo. CURRENT DUTY ASSIGNMENT US Central Command BILLET DESCRIPTION J-3 Future Ops Officer MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES PMOS AMOS 1 AMOS 2 AMOS 3 0302 0602 Infantry Officer Communications Officer AMOS 4 ACQ JOINT BMOS 9910 DCTB 20030717 TRAINING SUMMARY RIFLE PISTOL PFT MCMAP Unrestricted Officer E/340 M/340 A/289 TAN LANGUAGES 19980915 20030922 20030815 1994 1990 French Spanish EDUCATION SUMMARY CIVILIAN 1990 1986 1982 BA, Biology Associates Deg HS DSG PILOT DCADB EAS LCN 12345678 19890520 MILITARY 1993 1987 1990 1989 PME Winter Mountain Leader Summer Mountain Leader Airborne Assault Climbers Infantry Officer (TBS) Basic School 2002 1997 1995 1994 Command & Staff Non-Res AWS Ph II AWS Ph I Warfighting Skills Prog ******* PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SUMMARY ******* ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Grade OCC From BMOS Type To Capt GC 19980801 0302 N Maj CH 19990504 0302 C Maj 19990503 Maj TR 20000120 0302 N Maj 9 3 6 3 12 X CH 20010508 N Maj TR 20020703 9910 N Commanding Officer MCRS Pittsburg 14 Commanding Officer MCRS Pittsburg 20020702 20030630 BN Executive Officer 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines 20000414 9910 Operations Officer 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines 20000119 20010507 Operations Officer 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines CH 20000415 N Company Commander 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines X CH 19990801 C Billet Description Com Adv Command 19990801 0302 9910 Months 12 X Commanding Officer MCRS Pittsburg REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS Reporting Senior Promote Reports Lt. Col Stickler Yes Yes https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil D C F B F F E 5 of 8 C F D 3. 79 REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval RPT at High RV at Proc B C C C H C B F E D 4. 42 B 2. 82 C C H E E D C C B D F E B F E E C D 5. 00 D C E E E D C 1 H D B B C D E E C D 83. 67 C E B D E H H E E D D 80. 00 Concur Col Spredlode Yes Col Spredlode Suff Yes Col Fairmark No Col Fairmark Suff 86. 44 D Obser Suff 93. 68 E Reviewing Officer Suff N/A 83. 87 D H 81. 89 93. 68 E C 89. 76 N/A E Cum RV 96. 00 83. 70 1 D B 89. 76 1 5. 86 D B 1 5. 57 E H B 94. 60 2 2. 30 E B 1 6. 38 B C 1 3. 50 5. 33 D Set Rs High 5. 12 E Dev RS Avg 2. 30 5. 14 C Lea 5. 95 5. 21 E Ini 2. 93 2. 30 F 7 of 12 C Eff 2. 25 4. 46 21 of 21 Col Deesmost B 2. 88 B Col Eeplus Yes C 1 of 1 Col Inflatorio C 2. 53 11 of 16 Lt. Col Solo Yes C 8 of 8 Lt. Col Highmark Pro Cou RPT Avg 14 of 17 Lt. Col Smidgen Yes Per Yes BGen Lowbranch Suff No BGen Toptree Suff Yes RO marks - same grade at processing RO marks - same grade cumulative 0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 0/1 1/2 9/3 12/4 1/6 0/7 0/8 23/5 11/6 2/5 1/7 0/8 0/1 0/2 1/3 2/4 2/5 0/1 0/2 2/3 7/4 7/5 2/6 0/7 0/8 5/6 2/7 0/8 0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 1/1 1/2 2/3 4/4 1/6 0/7 0/8 17/5 12/6 7/7 1/8 0/1 1/2 1/3 3/4 1/1 1/2 2/3 4/4 1/6 0/7 0/8 17/5 12/6 7/7 1/8 1/1 0/2 3/3 3/4 18/5 20/6 12/7 0/8 2/1 0/2 5/3 7/4 24/5 26/6 16/7 1/8 0/1 1/2 0/3 7/4 38/5 17/6 4/7 0/8 0/1 1/2 0/3 9/4 46/5 19/6 5/7 1/8 3/5 BGen Panzer Insuff 2

Administrative Summary ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Grade OCC From BMOS Type To Capt GC 19980801 0302 N 19990503 CH 19990504 C 19990801 CH 19990801 C 20000119 TR 20000120 N 20000414 Maj 0302 https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil Months Com Billet Description Adv 9 Command Company Commander X 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines 3 Operations Officer X 6 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines Operations Officer 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines 3 BN Executive Officer 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines 3

Administrative Summary (cont) ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Grade OCC From BMOS Type To Capt GC 19980801 0302 N 19990503 CH 19990504 C 19990801 CH 19990801 C 20000119 TR 20000120 N 20000414 Maj 0302 https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil Months Com Billet Description Adv 9 Command Company Commander X 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines 3 Operations Officer X 6 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines Operations Officer 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines 3 BN Executive Officer 1 st Battalion 2 d Marines 4

What is Relative Value? • RV is a numerical representation of how a single fitness report compares to other reports written by the same RS on Marines of the same grade • RV= TOOL that displays RS’s marking philosophy • RV should be used within the context of all other information on the report • RV=Common Language that translates the RS’s Marking Philosophy (fitrep average ) by grade of Marine reported on • RV Levels the playing field among RSs reporting on Marines of the same grade https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil 5

How does RV Work? • • • RS must process at least three reports on Marines of the same grade before RV is displayed on MBS Standard curve scaled from 80 to 100 Each of 14 attributes has marking gradients from A through H where: (A=1, B=2 … G=7; H = 0) Ave. of observed attributes=Fitrep Average – i. e. a straight B report (28/14) = 2. 0 Fitrep Average plugged into an algebraic formula that gives the report a value on a standard curve REMEMBER: Approximately Half of all observed fitreps (Sgt – Lt. Col) will be less than 90 RV 2. 0 RS Average = 3. 5 3. 0 4. 0 5. 0 80 90 100 Hypothetical distribution of 4 reports on a standard curve Below 90 RV does NOT mean Below Average Performance https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil 6

Reporting Senior Markings REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini Promote Reports Lt. Col Stickler Yes C D 11 of 16 Lt. Col Solo C B 2. 53 8 of 8 Lt. Col Highmark Yes C 14 of 17 Lt. Col Smidgen Yes RPT Avg C 1 of 1 https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil Cum RV B C C H 2. 88 2. 93 F C E 4. 46 B RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc 2. 25 C B 2. 30 C B C 2. 82 C C E E H C C 2. 30 B H D D D B B C 1 B H D D C B NA C H 89. 76 E 83. 70 B H 96. 00 89. 76 2 B B 94. 60 1 6. 38 B C 1 3. 50 5. 95 C Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval E H 81. 89 C B H NA 7

Reporting Senior Markings (cont) REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini Promote Reports Lt. Col Stickler Yes C D 11 of 16 Lt. Col Solo C B 2. 53 8 of 8 Lt. Col Highmark Yes C 14 of 17 Lt. Col Smidgen Yes RPT Avg C 1 of 1 https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil Cum RV B C C H 2. 88 2. 93 F C E 4. 46 B RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc 2. 25 C B 2. 30 C B C 2. 82 C C E E H C C 2. 30 B H D D D B B C 1 B H D D C B NA C H 89. 76 E 83. 70 B H 96. 00 89. 76 2 B B 94. 60 1 6. 38 B C 1 3. 50 5. 95 C Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval E H 81. 89 C B H NA 8

Section K: Reviewing Officers Comparative Assessment K. REVIEWING OFFICER COMMENTS 1. OBSERVATION: X Sufficient Insufficient 2. EVALUATION: X Concur DESCRIPTION 3. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT: Provide a comparative assessment of potential by placing an "X" in the appropriate box. In marking the comparison, consider all Marines of this grade whose professional abilities are known to you personally. Do Not Concur COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT 0 THE EMINENTLY QUALIFIED MARINE 0 ONE OF THE FEW EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED MARINES 1 ONE OF THE MANY HIGHLY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS WHO FORM THE MAJORITY OF THIS GRADE *NUMBERS ELECTRONICALLY OVERLAID AT TIME OF PROCESSING (OCT 2001) *INFORMATION EFFECTIVE AT TIME PROCESSING AND WILL NOT CHANGE *INFORMATION WILL SHOW UP ON OMPF AND DIGITAL BOARDROOM COPIES OF FITREP X 2 3 1 A QUALIFIED MARINE 0 UNSATISFACTORY 0 NUMBERS INDICATE TOTAL ASSESSMENTS AND HOW MANY TIMES RO HAS MARKED MARINES OF SAME GRADE ON THAT PORTION OF COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT TREE. https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil 11

Reviewing Officer Markings REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS Reviewing Officer Obser Concur Col Spreadlode (Capt GC) Suff Yes Col Spreadlode (Maj AN) Suff Yes Col Fairmark Suff No Col Fairmark Suff Yes https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil RO marks - same grade at processing RO marks - same grade cumulative 0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 1/6 0/7 0/8 0/1 1/2 9/3 12/4 23/5 11/6 1/7 0/8 0/1 0/2 1/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 0/7 0/8 0/1 0/2 2/3 7/4 7/5 5/6 2/7 0/8 0/1 0/2 1/3 3/4 2/5 1/6 0/7 0/8 1/1 1/2 2/3 4/4 17/5 12/6 7/7 1/8 0/1 1/2 1/3 3/4 3/5 1/6 0/7 0/8 1/1 1/2 2/3 4/4 17/5 12/6 7/7 1/8 12

What do the numbers mean? • Relative Value – 90 RV is not the magic # – RV broken down into thirds • Upper: 93. 34 to 100 • Middle: 86. 67 to 93. 33 • Lower: 80. 00 to 86. 66 • Comparative Assessment – RO marks in relation to your peers • Above: how many ranked above you. • With: how many ranked with you. • Below: how many ranked below you. • It is paramount that the content of the entire report be considered, not just the above numbers https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil 13

https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil 14

Questions? https: //www. mmsb. usmc. mil 15