Performance Based Navigation leading towards a performance based

Performance Based Navigation leading towards a performance based Airspace concept Erwin Lassooij Manager Performance Based Navigation Programme ICAO Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 1 30/09/2020

Presentation overview QPBN – background QPBN - Concept QRCP and RSP QOverview of presentations on Thursday Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 2 30/09/2020

Aviation challenges : Q Growing demands for RNAV approaches (safety, accessibility) Q Growing demands for solution airspace congestion Q Growing fuel efficiency requirements Q Growing Environmental requirements Q Can be met with most of current technology, but standardization and operational requirements have to be put into place Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 3 30/09/2020

Background ICAO RNP concept Q FANS identified need for performance based navigation and developed Required Navigation Performance capability concept : Ø To avoid need for ICAO selection between competing systems Q Manual on Required Navigation Performance (doc 9613) Q Emphasize on the en-route phase of flight (RNP-10 and RNP-4) for oceanic and remote applications Q No ICAO RNP requirements for continental enroute and terminal applications. Ø Proliferation of national standards Ø Wide variety of functional requirements Ø Variety of required navigation sensors Ø Differing air crew requirements Ø Lack of global harmonization Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 4 30/09/2020

Approach proliferation of types Non-Precision Approach Non. Precision Approach with Vertical guidance (APV) Precision Approach Definition of operations become very blurred Need for performance requirements and possibly need for reclassification RNAV (GNSS) Basic-GNSS RNP APV LPV GAGAN GRAS WAAS LNAV/VNAV SBAS GBAS Baro-VNAV Galileo Etc. Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 5 30/09/2020

Background Industry’ s RNP concept has continued to evolve outside ICAO Q RTCA/EUROCAE defined performance and functional requirements Q Industry ‘s RNP requires performance monitoring and alerting Conflict Q Current ICAO concept does not require performance and alerting Q Now we have two RNP concepts. Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 6 30/09/2020

Are we now going the right way? P R E S E N T Europe US B-RNAV Boeing P-RNAV RNP US-RNAV Australia China Airbus Canada RNP 10 RNP 4 RNP/RNAV Japan South America F U T U R E Not safe, not efficient, costly, confusing Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 7 30/09/2020

ICAO Recognizes the problems Q Need for focal point in ICAO to address problems experienced with RNP Concept (GNSSP/4 recommendation 1/1) Q ANC (163/9) approves establishment of Required Navigation Performance Special operational requirements Study Group (RNPSORSG) as coordinating group Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 8 30/09/2020

What needs to be done Q Original RNP concept in principle good, however… Q Adjustment to the RNP concept required. Ø Clear distinction between operations that require performance monitoring and alerting and operations that don’t require Ø Harmonization of current RNAV and RNP operations Ø Development of new navigation specification to meet operational demand. Ø Need for clear operational approval requirements Ø Clear implementation guidance Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 9 30/09/2020

Agreeing PBN Q PBN specifies RNAV system performance i. e. accuracy, integrity, continuity, availability + functionality; - written up in navigation specifications RNP X specifications RNAV X specifications Require on-board performance monitoring + alerting Do not require on-board performance monitoring + alerting This is different than the RNP concept, which stressed navigation accuracy and ‘stopped’ at required performance. However, PBN is anchored in detailed navigation specifications, which contain performance and functionality requirements. Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 10 30/09/2020

Harmonization of existing navspecs Area of Application Simplification results in lower costs for Operators and ANSP Nav accuracy Designation of navigation standard: Current situation Designation of navigation specification: PBN concept (new) 10 RNP 10 RNAV 10 (RNP 10 label) 4 RNP 4 En. Route- Continental 5 RNP 5 Basic RNAV 5 En Route - Continental and Terminal 2 USRNAV type A RNAV 2 Terminal 1 USRNAV type B and P-RNAV 1 Oceanic/ Remote Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 11 30/09/2020

Harmonization of RNAV operations not covered by existing nav specs Area of Application Nav accuracy (NM) Terminal 1 Approach 1 -0. 3 Approach 1 -0. 1 Designation of navigation standard: Current situation Basic-GNSS SBAS Basic-GNSS (Baro-VNAV) SBAS RNP SAAAR (US) Designation of navigation specification: PBN concept (new) Basic-RNP 1 RNP APCH RNP AR APCH Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 12 30/09/2020

Harmonization of existing RNAV operations not covered by nav specs Ø RNP approach for lowest common denominator Area of Nav Application accuracy Ø Meets RNP 0. 3 in final segment (NM) Designation of navigation standard: Current situation Ø Basic GNSS/SBAS Ø Functionalities: VNAV optional Terminal 1 Ø No Special authorization required Approach 1 -0. 3 1 -0. 1 Basic-GNSS SBAS Basic-GNSS (Baro-VNAV) SBAS RNP SAAAR (US) Designation of navigation specification: PBN concept (new) Basic-RNP 1 RNP APCH RNP AR APCH Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 13 30/09/2020

Harmonization of existing RNAV operations not covered by nav specs Ø RNP approach for lowest common denominator Area of Nav Application accuracy Ø Meets RNP 0. 3 in final segment (NM) Ø Basic GNSS/SBAS Ø Functionalities: VNAV optional Terminal 1 Ø No Special authorization required Approach 1 -0. 3 1 -0. 1 Designation of Ø Scaleable RNP (0. 3 – 0. 1 NM) navigation standard: Ø Functionalities: VNAV, RF legs specification: Current situation PBN concept Ø Authorization required (small protection (new) area) Basic-GNSS Ø Operational approval Basic-RNP 1 SBAS Ø Aircraft qualification Basic-GNSS (Baro-VNAV) SBAS RNP SAAAR (US) RNP APCH RNP AR APCH Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 14 30/09/2020

RNP SORSG Performance Based Navigation Concept No perf. monitor and alerting RNAV 10 Perf. Monitor and alerting RNP 4, Basic RNP 1 RNP APCH, RNP AR APCH Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 15 30/09/2020

ICAO Provisions Performance Based Navigation Manual Q PBN Manual to provide a “one-stop shop” for States on how to implement RNAV and RNP in their airspace Q PBN Manual being developed: Two Volumes: Ø Volume I – An Application of RNP and RNAV Ø Concept of PBN and how it is used Ø Implementation Guidance to States / Regions Ø Volume II – Compendium of Navigation Specifications RNAV 10 RNAV 1 RNP APCH RNAV 5 RNP 4 RNP AR APCH RNAV 2 Basic RNP 1 Advanced RNP 1* RNP 2* * Work in progress Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 16 30/09/2020

PBN Convergence…. P R E S E N T EUROPE US B-RNAV Boeing P-RNAV US-RNAV PBN RNP 10 Australia China Airbus Canada Japan South America RNP 4 F U T U R E RNPSORSG initiatives Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 17 30/09/2020

Context of PBN COM NAV RCP PBN SUR ATM RSP Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 18 30/09/2020

Required Communication Performance (RCP) Initiation Q Response to Recommendation 2/2 of the fourth meeting of the Aeronautical Mobile Communications Panel (AMCP/4, Montreal, April 1996). Q Air Navigation Commission tasked the Automatic Dependent Surveillance Panel (renamed as the Operational Data Link Panel (OPLINKP) in 2000) to develop the concept of RCP. Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 19 30/09/2020

Required Communication Performance (RCP) Achievements Q In 2001, the OPLINKP completed its Concept of Required Communication Performance document which became the basis for the Manual on Required Communication Performance (RCP) (Doc 9869) (available on the ICAO NET). Q In 2003, a continuation of the work on RCP was endorsed at the Eleventh Air Navigation Conference in the light of the urgent need for global harmonization of communication performance measures and support the efforts of States to transition to performance-based operations, a critical aspect of evolving to a safer and more efficient global ATM environment. Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 20 30/09/2020

Required Communication Performance (RCP) Critical elements of the concept Q Required communication performance (RCP). A statement of the performance requirements for operational communication in support of specific ATM functions. Q RCP is performance-based, human-centred, operationally significant, independent of specific technologies and applicable to both voice communications and data link communications. ICAO provisions: Q Recent amendments to Annex 6, 11 and the PANS-ATM include the initial high-level provisions necessary to support the introduction of RCP. (Applicable 22 November 2007). Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 21 30/09/2020

Required Surveillance Performance (RSP) Initiation Q Need identified by ICAO to complement PBN and RCP Q Work programme currently established by ICAO Q RSP can be used for both existing and future surveillance applications, airborne as well as terrestrial. It is envisaged that RSP will interact with other performance parameters (PBN, RCP) in meeting Required Total System Performance levels. Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 22 30/09/2020

Detailed presentations Q Introducing PBN Ø Mr. Alex Hendriks, EUROCONTROL, Ø Mr. Jeff Williams, US FAA Ø Mr. John Mc Graw US FAA Q Stake Holders perspective on PBN Ø Mr. Yoshiki Imawaka, JCAB Ø Mr. Dave Nakamura, ICCAIA Ø Mr. Dave Behrens, IATA Q PBN – The future Ø Mr. Erwin Lassooij, ICAO Q Progress on RCP Ø Mr. Tom Kraft, US FAA Q Progress on RSP Ø Mr. Massoud Paydar, ICAO Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 23 30/09/2020

END Thank you for your attention! Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 26 -30 March 2007 24 30/09/2020