Penelitian Ilmiah dan Penulisan Proposal Penelitian untuk menghasilkan

Penelitian Ilmiah dan Penulisan Proposal Penelitian untuk menghasilkan Publikasi pada Internasional Jurnal Bereputasi Teddy Mantoro teddy@ieee. org

About (Prof. Dr. Ir. Teddy Mantoro, MSc. , SMIEEE) � Professor and researcher in the Faculty Science and Technology, Sampoerna University, Jakarta, Indonesia � Adjunct Professor, Advanced Informatics School, Universiti Technologi Malaysia (UTM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (http: //www. ais. utm. my/teddy/) � Invited Lecturer - Pasca Sarjana: FTI-UBL dan PMPBI-UNJ, Guest Lecture – postgrad-Fasilkom-UI. � Chair of SKKNI-Mobile Computing, Kemkominfo (2015 -6), member of tim. Ahli penyusunan standard hasil penelitian –BSNP (2016) and deputy chair of KKNI Development, APTIKOM (2014 -2017). � Awarded a Ph. D - CS (Australian National University, Canberra, Australia) and MSc – CS (Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand).

Academic Profile ü ü ü 130+ Publications [Scopus: 94 papers] 25+ Awards 20+ Research Grants 5 Books (Elsevier/Atlantic, IEEE, Lambert, IIUM, IGI) 4 Patents Filing 4 Int’l Journal Editors TPC/REVIEWER 2016 (27 CONFERENCES) SCIEMATHIC 2016 (BALI, INDONESIA), ISYM 2016, APACE 2016 (LANGKAWI, MALAYSIA), CITSM 2016 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), IEACON 2016, ANDIC 2016, ICIC 2016 (LOMBOK, INDONESIA), ICSN 2016, ICMCS 2016 (MARRAKECH, MOROCCO), UBICOMM 2016 (VENICE, ITALY), MOMM 2016 (SINGAPORE), ICACI 2016, ICCN 2016, PECON 2016 (MELAKA, MALAYSIA), ICIICC 2016, SYSSARM 2016, PIAMSE 2016, IEEE-GCC 2016, ICINN 2016, IACE-T 2016, NCM 2016 (SEOUL, KOREA), EECSI 2016, EDUSTS 2017, ETC. TPC 2015 (34 conferences): ICCVIA 2015 (SOUSSE, TUNISIA), EQESS 2015 (DUBAI, UEA), CSNT 2015, PECON 2015 (KUCHING, SERAWAK, MALAYSIA), UBICOMM 2015 (NICE, FRANCE), ICOICT 2015 (BALI, INDONESIA), EECSI 2015 (PALEMBANG, INDONESIA), MEI 2015 (ORLANDO, USA), AWARECAST 2015 (SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, US), TIME-E 2015 (SAMOSIR ISLAND, INDONESIA), IIC 2015, CSNT 2015, MOMM 2015, ISYSM'2015 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), ICACCI-2015 (KERALA, INDIA), MOBIAPPS, 2015 (ROME, ITALY), ICACOMIT 2015 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), ICSPDM' 2015, WOTBD 2015 (NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO, CANADA), GAMEPEC 2015, ICSPDM 2015, PIAMSE 2015), ICOED 2015, EQESS 2015 (DUBAI, UEA), PECON 2015 (KUCHING, SERAWAK, MALAYSIA), ICACCI 2015, CGMIP 2015, CYBERSEC 2015, CITSM 2016, etc. TPC 2014: AINA 2014 (VICTORIA, CANADA), ICMCS 2014 (MARAKKESH, MOROCCO), UBICOMM 2014 (ROME, ITALY), ICT 4 M 2014 (KUCHING-MY), LTIA 2014 (DELHI-INDIA), ICOSSEET 2014 (PENANG, MY), ICOICT 2014 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), CHUSER 2014 (PENANG, MY), TIME-E 2014 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), AWARECAST 2014 (SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, US), ARICT 2014 (DUHOK, IRAK), ACSAT 2014 (AMMAN, JORDAN), SNATI 2014 (Yogjakarta, Indonesia), etc. TPC 2013: ICICM 2013 (KL, MY) , ICT 4 M 2013 (RABAT, MOROCCO), ICCNT 2013 (BUSAN, KOREA), ICIS 2013 (BEIJING, CHINA), TIME-E 2013 (BANDUNG, INDONESIA), IGCESH 2013 (JOHOR, MY), CSIT 2013 (YOGJA, INDONESIA), SHUSER 2013 (PENANG, MY), IDCTA 2013 (BEIJING, CHINA), ICMIC 2013, (BANGKOK, THAILAND), INC 2013 (BUSAN, KOREA), NCM 2013 (JEJU ISLAND, KOREA), ICIPM 2013 (SEOUL, KOREA), ICIDT 2013 (BEIJING, CHINA), WVNT/NETYS 2013 (MARRAKECH, MORROCO), BWCCA -2013 (COMPIEGNE, FRANCE), IPIN 2013 (MONTBÉLIARD, FRANCE), AWARECAST 2013, ACSAT 2013, etc. GENERAL CHAIR FOR CGMIP 2015 AND CYBERSEC 2015, (29 -31 OCTOBER 2015, JAKARTA, INDONESIA), CHAIR OF ICCMT 2013 (CHIANG MAY, THAILAND), CO-CHAIRS FOR ICT 4 M 2013, SERAWAK, MY, ICIMC 2013, KL, MY AND ARICT 2014, IRAK), TPC chair for ICIC 2016, LOMBOK, INDONESIA.

Agenda ü Pengindeks bereputasi Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak (IF) ü h-index dan g-index ü ü Penelitian Ilmiah ü ü ü Mencari bidang yang akan diteliti AI Method in Brief Jenis Publikasi karya ilmiah Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level) Penulisan Proposal dan publikasi Ilmiah ü Judul ü Abstract ü Introduction, methodology, etc. o Contoh penelitian dan hasilnya

Capaian Pembelajaran (Learning Outcome): Setelah mengikuti pelatihan ini Peserta diharapkan dapat: ü ü ü ü Menjelaskan tentang pengindeks bereputasi Membedakan Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak (IF) Dapat menghitung h-index dan g-index Dapat menetapkan area yang akan diteliti Dapat menetapkan Idea (Problem dan Solusi yang diusulkan) pada suatu penelitian Menulis proposal penelitian/paper dengan Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level) yang rendah. Penulisan Proposal yang berpotensi menghasilkan publikasi Ilmiah di jurnal Internasional bereputasi

Positioning

Positioning

Positioning

Cites Per Doc by Country (Scopus, 12/10/2016)

Perbandingan Jumlah Riset Paper di Scopus (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei) 31/8/2015

Google Scholar Variables: �Author �Area – define by author �Citations: All and the last 5 years �h-Index �i 10 -index �Total papers

Google Scholar Peneliti A +++ reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-IF --- first author atau corresponding author ---- bahasa Indonesia Disiplin ilmu: Biologi Citations=660 h-index = 14 I 10 -index=18 Peneliti B --- reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-IF +++ first author atau corresponding author +++ bahasa Indonesia Disiplin ilmu: Ilmu komputer Citations=1176 h-index = 17 I 10 -index=35

Scopus Peneliti A h-index=12 Docs=26 Citations=390 from 322 docs Peneliti B h-index=0 Docs=1 Citations=0 from 0 docs

Scopus Variables: �Author Id �ORCID �# docs �# Citations �# docs yg mengutip �h-Index �# co-authors �Subject area �Graph visualization

Web of Science – Thomson Reuters Variables: � Jumlah Docs � Jumlah sitasi tanpa self-citation � Citing-articles tanpa self-citation � Rata-2 citation per paper � h-index � Graph visualization � (Research. ID)

h-index The h-index is an author-level metric that attempts to measure both the productivity and citation impact of the publications of a scientist or scholar. Proposed by Jorge E. Hirsch (2005). The index is a measure of the number of highly impactful papers a scientist has published. The larger the number of important papers, the higher the h-index, regardless of where the work was published. To calculate it, only two pieces of information are required: the total number of papers published (Np) and the number of citations (Nc) for each paper. The h-index is defined by how many h of a researcher’s publications (Np) have at least h citations each. Source: http: //www. benchfly. com/blog/h-index-what-it-is-and-how-to-find-yours/

h-index � ‘The index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number greater than or equal to h, is a useful index to characterise the scientific output of a researcher. ’ (JE Hirsch) � The h-index is a measure of the number of publications published (productivity) as well as how often they are cited (impact). � PRODUCTIVITY + IMPACT = INFLUENCE If your h-index is 15, you have 15 papers cited 15 times or more. If your h-index is 20, you have 20 papers cited 20 times or more.

h-index H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total Peneliti C Kutipan/Sitasi 386 247 313 37 26 0 0 1109 Peneliti D Kutipan/Sitasi 145 40 27 18 14 5 5 257 h-index’s weakness -- not consider: • Type of author • # papers • # citations • # span of time

g-index The G-index was proposed by Leo Egghe in his paper "Theory and Practice of the G-Index" in 2006 as an improvement on the H-Index. G-Index is calculated this way: "[Given a set of articles] ranked in decreasing order of the number of citations that they received, the G-Index is the (unique) largest number such that the top g articles received (together) at least g^2 citations. " (from Harzig's Publish or Perish Manual) Advantages of the G-Index: Accounts for the performance of author's top articles Helps to make more apparent the difference between authors' respective impacts. The inflated values of the G-Index help to give credit to lowly-cited or non-cited papers while giving credit for highly-cited papers. Disadvantages of the G-Index: Introduced in 2006 and debate continues whether G-Index is superior to HIndex. Might not be as widely accepted as H-Index.

g-index’s weakness -- not consider: • Type of Author • # papers • # citations • # span of time

g-index Peneliti C Peneliti D N Kutipan/Sitasi Kumulatif Kutipan/Sitasi N x N 1 386 1 1 145 1 2 247 633 4 2 40 185 4 3 313 946 9 3 27 212 9 4 37 983 16 4 18 230 16 5 26 5 14 234 25 0 1009 25 6 36 6 5 239 36 7 0 1009 49 7 5 49 8 0 1009 64 8 1 244 245 9 0 1009 81 9 1 246 81 10 0 1009 100 10 1 247 100 11 0 1009 121 11 0 247 121 12 0 1009 144 12 0 247 144 13 0 1009 169 13 0 247 169 14 0 1009 196 14 0 247 196 15 0 1009 225 15 0 247 225 16 0 1009 256 16 0 247 256 17 0 1009 289 17 0 247 289 18 0 1009 324 18 0 247 324 19 0 1009 361 19 0 247 361 20 0 1009 400 20 0 247 400 21 0 1009 441 21 0 247 441 22 0 1009 484 22 0 247 484 23 0 1009 529 23 0 247 529 24 0 1009 576 24 0 247 576 25 0 1009 625 25 0 247 625 26 0 1009 676 26 0 247 676 27 0 1009 729 27 0 247 729 28 0 1009 784 28 0 247 784 29 0 1009 841 29 0 247 841 30 0 1009 900 30 0 247 900 31 0 1009 961 31 0 247 961 32 0 1009 1024 32 0 247 1024 33 0 1009 1089 33 0 247 1089 34 0 1009 247 g-index=31 34 0 h-index=5 1156 h-index=5 g-index=15 1156 64

i 10 -index (similar with h-index with # citatition >=10) H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total Peneliti C Kutipan/Sitasi 386 247 313 37 26 0 0 1109 Peneliti D Kutipan/Sitasi 145 40 27 18 14 5 5 257 i 10 -index’s weakness -- not consider: • Type of author • # papers • # citations • # span of time

SJR: Scientific Journal Rankings SJR:

ISI Wo. S – Thomson Reuters

ISI Wo. S – Thomson Reuters

ISI Wo. S – Thomson Reuters

Wo. S – Thomson Reuters Master Journal List (http: //ip-science. thomsonreuters. com/mjl/)

Journal Impact Factor (IF) IF originally belong to Web of Science (Wo. S) of Thomson Reuters. � Journal Citation Report (JCR) – Wo. S and Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR) � The journal Impact Factor is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past two years have been cited in the JCR year. The Impact Factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the JCR year by the total number of articles published in the two previous years. � � http: //admin-apps. webofknowledge. com/JCR/help/h_impfact. htm

How to find the impact factor for a journal? Answer: Use Journal Citation Reports (JCR)

How to find the impact factor for a journal? Answer: Use Journal Citation Reports (JCR)

Contoh Perhitungan Impact Factor (Wo. S Thomson Reuters) Impact factor tahun 2015 (diumumkan ~Juni 2016) Jurnal X mempunyai IF=0. 5 Cites in 2015 to items published in: 2014 = 6 Number of items published in: 2014 = 10 2013 = 4 2013 = 10 Sum = 20 Calculation: Cites to recent items 10 = 0. 5 Number of recent items 20 Jurnal Y memiliki IF: 0. 696 Cites in 2015 to items published in: 2014 = 17 Number of items published in: 2014 = 10 2013 = 23 2013 =10 Sum = 40 Sum = 20 Calculation: Cites to recent items 40 = 2. 0 Number of recent items 20

Impact Factor Palsu (Bogus) Journal Impact Factor is from Journal Citation Report (JCR), a product of Thomson ISI (Institute for Scientific Information). JCR provides quantitative tools for evaluating journals. Perhitungan impact factor PALSU (Bogus Impact Factor Companies)? � Cite. Factor http: //www. citefactor. org � Global Impact Factor http: //globalimpactfactor. com � ISRA: Journal Impact Factor(JIF) http: //www. israjif. org � IMPACT Journals http: //www. impactjournals. us � General Impact Factor (GIF) http: //generalimpactfactor. com � Journal Impact Factor (JIF) http: //www. jifactor. com � Universal Impact Factor http: //uifactor. org � Index. Copernicus http: //journals. indexcopernicus. com � International Impact Factor Services (IIFS) http: //impactfactorservice. com � ISI International Scientific Indexing http: //isindexing. com Selain DOAJ terdapat beberapa indeking serupa: � Directory of Research Journals Indexing www. drji. org � CABELL’S Directories http: //www. cabells. com Other providers documents, papers and essays? � EDU Libs https: //edulibs. org � ISSUU http: //issuu. com Modified from Tole S, Rakornas APTIKOM, 2016

Penelitian Ilmiah Find the Area and build Idea 2. Writing Proposal 1. § Road-map § Methodology Secured Funding 4. Do the Research 5. Research output 3. § Prototype § Patent § Paper publication

Publikasi karya Ilmiah adalah satu Target Output dari suatu Penelitian. Jenis Publikasi Karya Ilmiah Journal Paper 2. Conference Paper 3. Book (edited & author) 4. Book Chapter 1.

Type of Research Papers (Literature) Review paper 2. Conceptual paper 3. Experimental paper 1. q q Literature Review paper Conceptual paper Experimental paper Weak Medium Strong Not Always, depend on how do you cook it Ex. : SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) - SPSS - Amos q q q Proof of Concept Proof of Existence Proof of performance

Finding the Research Fields � Area vs Idea � Searching the seed topic in the High Impact Factor Journals (in ISI Wo. S or Scopus) or use Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, Open Access Journals, etc.

Determining the Research Target: • • • Not a stagnant research area (too old and many researchers) Not a new field but hard to grow (small & too specific number of researchers) Search a new and fast growing field (based on publications and labs, new field and fast growing researchers)

EXAMPLE IEEEJOURNAL RANK (2004)

EXAMPLE IEEEJOURNAL RANK (2004)

Research Area (in my case)

Finding Research Problem and Contribution 1. 2. 3. How to find a strong problem Understanding the Problem Domain Thinking of Contribution

Building the understanding of the research domain 1. Finding Core Research Papers 2. Reading Research Papers 3. Writing Critical Reports 4. Build a Mind Mapping 5. Positioning: using table (as a part of state of the art literature review)

Reading papers � � Why do we have to read good papers? › The quality of your writing depends on the quality of your reading. Failure of reading a good paper can bring you to failure in understanding the problem domain, the strong solution, the strong methods, etc.

Reading a paper � Read only a good paper, but how to find a good paper? � Can we set-up a framework in our mind (structured thinking ) even before we read a paper � Join the communication among the researchers in a specific research area, by reading and try to find a way to improve their research work. If the idea to improve it is a good idea, then publish it. � What is the best way to read papers? Ø Find the most important thing in the paper, but what is it?

Research Process: Formulating the research idea � Source of idea for project › Scientific literature, own observations, other individuals expert, etc. � Literature review › Read literature › Integrate & cross reference ideas › Critically evaluate & discuss ideas � Formulate research questions › Consider theoretical foundations › Refine project idea (identify constructs

Research Process: Formulating the idea (cont. ) � Select methodological approach › Descriptive �Select way to study phenomenon of interest (survey, case study, naturalistic observation) › Experimental �Identify and formulate the hypotheses › Correlational �Identify specific variables of interest (predict nature of relationship)

Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level) � Normally about 30% (in USA, UK, etc. ) � Turnitin, Viber, i. Authenticate, etc. � To make it safe: 15% exclusing the references or 20% including reference

Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level)

Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level)

Summary so far Type of Research Papers Finding the research field 1. 2. › 3. 4. 5. 6. Area and Idea Searching the seed topic Determine the research target Define a research problem Research methodology formulation

Where to Publish? Contraints: � Budget: Free or low cost, location � Time of publishing Type of publications: 1. Journal Paper – Scopus (SCImago) 2. Conference Paper - IEEE Xplore, ACM-DL Scopus 3. Book (editor & author) – Elsevier Scopus 4. Book Chapter – Elsevier Scopus

Before Publishing your paper • Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers http: //publicationethics. org/files/Code%20 of%20 conduct%20 for%20 p ublishers%20 FINAL_1_0. pdf • Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing http: //publicationethics. org/files/Principles%20 of%20 Transparency%2 0 and%20 Best%20 Practice%20 in%20 Scholarly%20 Publishing. pdf From: COPE - Committee on Publication Ethics. Sample of debatting for journal paper in using COPE`: here Sample of answer: here

Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 https: //scholarlyoa. files. wordpress. com/2015/01/criteria-2015. pdf https: //scholarlyoa. com/publishers/ https: //scholarlyoa. com/individual-journals/ Jurnal predator definition is debatable. Someone asked: I wonder why you have not added these Predatory Publishers in your list yet * Plos * Hindawi * Elsevier � Hindawi was in Beall’s list (2012? ) � Now, some countries realease their own list (list in the next page). � �

Release Journal List Publishers by Country Now, some countries realease their own list, example: Australia: http: //www. arc. gov. au/era-2015 -submitted-journal-list download: http: //www. arc. gov. au/sites/default/files/filedepot/Public/ERA%202015/ERA 2015_Sub mitted_Journal_List. V 2. xlsx Malaysia: Publishers NOT Recognized by Malaysia Ministry of Education (MOE) http: //epsas. upm. edu. my/psasrip/images/pdf 2015/publishers. pdf http: //zetty 1977. weebly. com/uploads/2/6/6/4/26648302/blacklisted_journal_by_moe. pdf Iran: (Black List) http: //ceit. aut. ac. ir/autcms/news. Detail. htm? id=1777500177&depurl=computerengineering&lang=en&cid=1865 Thailand: (Approved) http: //www. elearning. au. edu/publications/ Pakistan: (Recognised) http: //www. hec. gov. pk/insidehec/divisions/qali/qadivision/pages/hecrecognizedjournals. asp x

Release List Publishers by University Malaysia: Publishers NOT Recognized by UPM http: //epsas. upm. edu. my/psasrip/images/pdf 2015/publishers. pdf ITB: (Black List) https: //www. itb. ac. id/files/12/20131121/Blacklisted. Publishers-andtheir. Respective. Journals. pdf

Release List Publishers by Dikti Jurnal yang Perlu Dipertimbangkan untuk Kenaikan Pangkat/Jabatan Dosen http: //pak. dikti. go. id/portal/? p=41 Daftar Jurnal yang Masuk Blacklist Tim PAK Dikti http: //www. kopertis 12. or. id/2014/04/11/daftar-jurnal-yang-masukblacklist-tim-pak-dikti. html (Sayangnya tidak di update, 2013).

Where to Publish? � � � � Scimago Science Direct Emerald IGI Global Hindawi IEEE Xplore Etc.

SCImago http: //scimagojr. com/

SJR: Scientific Journal Rankings SJR:

Emerald http: //www. emeraldinsight. com/

IGI Global http: //www. igi-global. com/journals/indices/index/all

Hindawi https: //www. hindawi. com/

Science Direct http: //www. sciencedirect. com/science/journals

Contoh hasil penelitian: Surelator: Optimal Quality Translation from Bahasa Indonesia to English (vice versa) Indonesia has 722 living language + 1 official language used by more than 240 million people (Lewis, 2009). � Estimated only less than 10% Indonesian has the capability in a reasonable level of English. � Research on machine translation has been done extensively for certain languages such as English, Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, and French but not in Bahasa Indonesia. � Currently we have developed our own good quality corpus from multi domain (3 millions words parallel corpus). � � 28 parameters have been studied including language modelling (3), ngram (8 parameters), alighment (9 parameters), and reordering (8 parameters) producing ~270 millions experiments to find the optimal quality translation (Noted: an experiments took between 2 -9 hours).

SURELATOR Performance Comparison with other translation tools: Google Translator, Rekso Translator and SURElator English to Indonesian

SURELATOR Performance Comparison with other translation tools: Google Translator, Rekso Translator and SURElator Indonesian to English

SURELATOR Performance Comparison with other translation tools: Google Translator, Rekso Translator and SURElator The latest result English to Indonesian Scheme (NIST) NIST BLEU Time Google 7. 2177 0. 2697 8 Rekso 3. 8365 0. 0726 196 Surelator Speed 8. 5465 0. 4023 29 Surelator Quality 8. 4962 0. 4230 75 Indonesian to English Scheme (NIST) Google NIST BLEU Time 7. 3531 0. 2875 8 Rekso 4. 1575 0. 0860 135 Surelator Speed 8. 5842 0. 4032 23 Surelator Quality 8. 7183 0. 4181 87

Interactive Peer-Tracking Framework for Hajj Pilgrims

PROBLEM ANALYSIS 1. The number of people who went to the Hajj pilgrimage in 2006 is 2, 130, 594, where 73% of the pilgrims are non-saudi pilgrims [1]. 2. 3. In 2010, 64. 27% (1, 799, 601) of total 2. 8 million pilgrims were non Saudi [2]. In 2011, 62, 44% (1, 828, 195) of total pilgrims [3]. 4. In Indonesia, hajj quota has been reduced by 20%, from the original quota of 211, 000 pilgrims (2013) [5] and Increase again to 168. 800 in 2014 [6]. In Malaysia, Hajj Quota is increased to 28, 000 in 2011 from 26, 000 in 2010 [4] and decrease to 22, 320 in 2014. 5. More than 2, 500 cases of missing people in the area of Masjid al-Haram, the grand mosque in Makkah, during Ramadan 2005. Increasing 14% each year and many more are not reported [1] for umrah only, and for Hajj, it is estimated 4 times of cases of missing people. 6. It is estimated more than 30 people die everyday during Hajj peak time, most of [1] Statistic released by Ministry of Hajj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), 2006. them are elderly. [2] Framework for Hajj Pilgrimage Tracking System in a Pervasive Computing Environment. IJMCMC, IGI Global, July 2011. [3] Information office of the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia in Washington DC, 2011. [4] Hajj Quota for Malaysian pilgrims to 28, 000, the Star Online. [5] Jakarta post, available at http: //www. thejakartaglobe. com/news/indonesia-hajj-quota-slashed-by 20/. [6] Antara News, http: //www. antaranews. com/berita/455840/seluruh-jamaah-haji-indonesia-tuntas-ketanah-suci

AIMS AND BENEFITS Mainly Hajj. Locator has two aims: 1 - To reduce worrying (peace of mind). Provide a tracking facility to the users when they perform hajj, for their family in their home country. 2 - To save life. Provide carefully designed SOS button, when a user (especially elderly) in panic situation.

Hajj. Locator Framework ver 1. 0 Hajj. Locator framework Client-side application interface The design on how the internet technology can help to reduce worrying and save a live.

Hajj. Locator Setting Running the test on Smart. Phone Hajj. Locator Client application interface Location projection in Makkah surroundings for user testing purpose

Key Features of Reliable Emergency Communication Infrastructure Model Key Feature for a Reliable Emergency Communication for the Server and Mobile client apps. : 1. Tracking user based on time, distance and user request. 2. SOS Tracking and SOS Saved 3. SOS button 4. Life Update 5. Geolocation (Single/multiple users and User Distribution) 6. Geo-Fencing 7. Update History (With Filtering) 8. Auto-reboot 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. History of user location (google map) Text Based Monitoring SMS notification of user location SMS triggering for peers/family Update multi-user location (google map) Silent call function Speeding detection Control remotely 75

Tracking User Based on Time, Distance and User Request Example: Tracking user based on time (yellow), distance (blue) and user request (red). 76

Tracking User Based on Time and Distance Comparison of actual GPS coordinates in location test bed in the university and Makkah

Geofence SMS or others massaging system is currently used for user when it comes or goes to a fence

Hajj. Locator on i. Phone

Hajj. Locator clients on Blackberry Award for Hajj. Locator so far: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Gold Medal - IIUM Research, Invention and Innovation Exhibition – IRIIE 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Gold Medal - Innovation Showcase in the International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems – ICRIIS 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. WIAF 2013 winner, on category “Software Engineering of Merit”, the 2 nd Annual 2013 World Inventor Award Festival, Seoul, Korea. ISIF 2012 Award Winner, 1 st rank, on Community Choice Award on category Code for the Common Good. Gold medal - IIUM Research, Invention and Innovation Exhibition - IRIIE 2012, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia. Silver Medal - Malaysia Technology Expo - MTE 2011, Kuala Lumpur Convention Center, 17 -19 February 2011. Silver Medal - IIUM Research, Invention and Innovation Exhibition 2011 - IRIIE 2011, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.

Thakn yuo for yrou atteniton… teddy@ieee. org