PENALTY SELECTION METHODS IN NETWORK MODELS ANNA WYSOCKI
- Slides: 38
PENALTY SELECTION METHODS IN NETWORK MODELS ANNA WYSOCKI, M. S. awysocki@ucdavis. edu
GAUSSIAN GRAPHICAL MODELS
How are network models estimated?
Ω= -1 Σ i i. 953 j. 01 k -. 03 l 0 j . 01 . 957 -. 06 -. 02 k -. 03 -. 06 . 957 0 l 0 -. 02 0 . 952
Ω= -1 Σ i i. 953 j. 01 k -. 03 l 0 j . 01 . 957 -. 06 -. 02 k -. 03 -. 06 . 957 0 l 0 -. 02 0 . 952
Ω= -1 Σ i i. 953 j. 01 k -. 03 l 0 j . 01 . 957 -. 06 -. 02 k -. 03 -. 06 . 957 0 l 0 -. 02 0 . 952
Choosing lambda is extremely important. As different lambdas can correspond to different networks.
PENELTY SELECTION • Cross-Validation. METHODS • Stability Approach to Regularization Selection (St. ARS) • Rotation Information Criterion (RIC) • Extended Bayesian Information Criterion (EBIC)
PENELTY SELECTION METHODS
PENELTY SELECTION METHODS i≠j
PENELTY SELECTION • Cross-Validation. METHODS • Stability Approach to Regularization Selection (St. ARS) • Rotation Information Criterion (RIC) • Extended Bayesian Information Criterion (EBIC)
PENELTY SELECTION • Cross-Validation. METHODS • Stability Approach to Regularization Selection (St. ARS) • Rotation Information Criterion (RIC) • Extended Bayesian Information Criterion (EBIC)
• Expected Performance • CV Over-selects (Chetverikov et al. , 2017; Yu & Feng, 2013) • EBIC + PC size (Kuisman & Sillanpaa, 2016) • Low-Dimensional • EBIC Performance (Epskamp, 2016; Epskmap, Borsboom & Fried, 2018) • EBIC vs non-regularized methods (Williams, Rhemtulla, Wysocki & Rast, 2018) • St. ARS vs. EBIC vs. RIC (Mohammadi & Wit, 2015)
• Expected Performance • CV Over-selects (Chetverikov et al. , 2017; Yu & Feng, 2013) • EBIC + PC size (Kuisman & Sillanpaa, 2016) • Low-Dimensional • EBIC Performance (Epskamp, 2016; Epskmap, Borsboom & Fried, 2018) • EBIC vs non-regularized methods (Williams, Rhemtulla, Wysocki & Rast, 2018) • St. ARS vs. EBIC vs. RIC (Mohammadi & Wit, 2015)
• Expected Performance • CV Over-selects (Chetverikov et al. , 2017; Yu & Feng, 2013) • EBIC + PC size (Kuisman & Sillanpaa, 2016) • Low-Dimensional • EBIC Performance (Epskamp, 2016; Epskmap, Borsboom & Fried, 2018) • EBIC vs non-regularized methods (Williams, Rhemtulla, Wysocki & Rast, 2018) • St. ARS vs. EBIC vs. RIC (Mohammadi & Wit, 2015)
• Expected Performance • CV Over-selects (Chetverikov et al. , 2017; Yu & Feng, 2013) • EBIC + PC size (Kuisman & Sillanpaa, 2016) • Low-Dimensional • EBIC Performance (Epskamp, 2016; Epskmap, Borsboom & Fried, 2018) • EBIC vs non-regularized methods (Williams, Rhemtulla, Wysocki & Rast, 2018) • St. ARS vs. EBIC vs. RIC (Mohammadi & Wit, 2015)
• Expected Performance • CV Over-selects (Chetverikov et al. , 2017; Yu & Feng, 2013) • EBIC + PC size (Kuisman & Sillanpaa, 2016) • Low-Dimensional • EBIC Performance (Epskamp, 2016; Epskmap, Borsboom & Fried, 2018) • EBIC vs non-regularized methods (Williams, Rhemtulla, Wysocki & Rast, 2018) • St. ARS vs. EBIC vs. RIC (Mohammadi & Wit, 2015)
1. What is the best method for psychological data? 2. How does partial correlation size affect performance? 3. How does sparsity affect performance?
SIMULATION PROCEDURE • Conditions • Sample Size (100, 250, 500, …, 3000) • Number of Variables (20) • Sparsity (. 10, . 20, …, . 90) • Partial Correlation Range (-. 1, . 1 ; -. 3, . 3 ; -. 5, . 5) • Performance Measures • False Positive Rate • Sensitivity
How does sparsity affect method performance?
How does partial correlation size affect method performance?
What is the best method for psychological data?
SUMMARY • Sparsity and partial correlation size matter • CV: Sensitive but with a cost • EBIC: Inconsistent Results • St. ARS + RIC most balanced results
THANK YOU! ANNA WYSOCKI, M. S. awysocki@ucdavis. edu
- Anna wysocki
- Leszek wysocki pwr
- Leszek wysocki pwr
- Fraktale ciekawostki
- Matthew wysocki
- Matt wysocki
- Difference between models and semi modals
- Business analytics methods models and decisions
- An introduction to variational methods for graphical models
- Business analytics methods models and decisions
- Business analytics methods models and decisions
- Four special cases in linear programming
- The engineering design of systems: models and methods
- Direct wax pattern
- Erp system options and selection methods
- Initial assessment methods for internal selection
- Selection methods in hrm
- Erp selection methods and criteria
- The steps involved in portfolio selection
- Role of methods
- Acmee model of sales training
- Introduction to erp systems
- Selection project chap
- Balancing selection vs stabilizing selection
- Artificial selection vs natural selection
- K selected
- Natural selection vs artificial selection
- Difference between continuous and discontinuous variation
- What is artificial selection
- Clumped dispersion
- Natural selection vs artificial selection
- Two way selection and multiway selection
- Two way selection and multiway selection in c
- Mass selection
- Deontology death penalty
- Echr death penalty
- Death penalty philosophy
- Affine gap penalty formula
- Thesis statement about death penalty