Peering Operations NOCtoPeer Communications Standards Ren Provo ren

  • Slides: 12
Download presentation
Peering Operations: NOC-to-Peer Communications Standards Ren Provo, ren. provo@att. com AT&T Internet Services

Peering Operations: NOC-to-Peer Communications Standards Ren Provo, ren. provo@att. com AT&T Internet Services

Common Peering Expectations • Peer must have a 24 x 7 NOC with internal

Common Peering Expectations • Peer must have a 24 x 7 NOC with internal trouble ticket capability, email & phone coverage. • Commit to joint capacity planning and ongoing review. • Security concerns should be worked out jointly unless under court order or denial of service (DOS) attack. • Neither party should discuss network of peer with clients or media • Can be a customer of a service if not Internet access • Post your guidelines! http: //www. att. com/peering/

Top Reasons Not to Discuss Existing Peering Relationships • Peering relationships evolve daily •

Top Reasons Not to Discuss Existing Peering Relationships • Peering relationships evolve daily • Legal or regulatory efforts may be underway • Alliances, merger & acquisition activity supercedes most current and/or posted peering policies. • Most peering relationships in the US are bound by NDAs. • Some peers consider this press release activity and insist on joint review, especially if their logo is included. • Listing some but not all peers raises eyebrows about ‘missing’ peers so lists should not be supplied

Peering Contacts Should Be Standardized • Peering@ - Policy/business hours Alias should reach a

Peering Contacts Should Be Standardized • Peering@ - Policy/business hours Alias should reach a person who can advise as to new peering process, augments to existing peerings and support communication and contact updates with peering partners. • Network Operations Center – 24 x 7 Alias should reach a person(s) who can work with internal peering team to resolve maintenance and outage concerns. Should BGP routing/peering be outside the scope of the NOC role, the NOC should be able to escalate peering issues promptly to BGP/peering friendly engineers.

Reasons to Communicate • Maintenance notifications are encouraged but not required. As a positive

Reasons to Communicate • Maintenance notifications are encouraged but not required. As a positive relationship maintainer, and to keep current contacts, make the effort if a session will be affected for +15 minutes. • If you know you will trigger alarms, interrupt monitoring, change a MAC address that will halt RRD, MRTG, etc. supply a ‘heads-up’ rather than waste cycles with your peer network. • Discovery of network issue impacting a few or all peers.

Subject Line Format – Why So Picky? • Blank subject lines are just plain

Subject Line Format – Why So Picky? • Blank subject lines are just plain sloppy! • ‘bgp session down’ or ‘emergency reload’ is not helpful when sent to 1, 000 s of people on mailing lists and/or NOC distributions. • IX location in human readable vs. router-name format. Why force your peers to research your naming schema? • Peer writing to/ASN & peer writing from/ASN – why? - Mergers, acquisitions, marketing whims… include the ASN to reduce the guessing game. - Chronic tracking of ongoing threads with searchable subject lines. - Some networks have multiple ASNs and identification of the sub-network will expedite resolution.

Use Subject Lines Wisely • Purpose: Help your peers track & rapidly resolve outages.

Use Subject Lines Wisely • Purpose: Help your peers track & rapidly resolve outages. • AS 7132’s preferred subject line format: <IX location in human readable vs. router-name format: > <peer writing to/ASN>&<peer writing from/ASN> <what is the general issue> <date of initial outreach> - <time of initial message> • Example subject line: Equinix-Dallas: RCN/6079 & AT&T/7132 – new session - 29 -Mar-06 - 9: 45 am EST

State the General Issue • In large organizations the message will likely be forwarded

State the General Issue • In large organizations the message will likely be forwarded for assistance based on the issue at hand. Help prevent emails that rope in half an organization. • Suggested ‘general issues’ include: - session down – fine after listing where/who - zero prefix – this does trigger alarms in some systems - inconsistent prefix/origin - move to new connection – more common for publics - upgrading capacity to facility - emergency maintenance - scheduled maintenance

List the Date & Time that the Issue Was Discovered • Assist data correlation

List the Date & Time that the Issue Was Discovered • Assist data correlation with tools, reports, timelines, etc. • Remember that peers are global and email headers usually only contain local time to the user, not the location of the incident. • Email threads get forwarded and sometimes get stuck in a human queue for periods of time. • Chronic outage issues are easier to track.

Subject Line Format Examples • NOTA-Miami: Tel. Italia/6762 & AT&T/7132 – emergency maintenance –

Subject Line Format Examples • NOTA-Miami: Tel. Italia/6762 & AT&T/7132 – emergency maintenance – 15 -Jan-06 – 2: 30 pm Central – • PAIX-Palo Alto: TNZI/4648 & AT&T/7132 – migrate session – 27 -Feb-06 – 1: 15 pm Central – • Reason: Card failed where private peer session was in use. Reason: we discovered they were closer to our gear in the PAIX Suite than at the SIX. Equinix-Dallas: ELI/5650 & AT&T/7132 – session down – 5 -Dec-05 – 12: 30 am Central – Reason: This was unscheduled and helped mark the start of an outage for ELI to troubleshoot.

Create a Peering Page • Peering ‘Guidelines’ or ‘Requirements’ are not ‘RULES’ • Peers

Create a Peering Page • Peering ‘Guidelines’ or ‘Requirements’ are not ‘RULES’ • Peers will have business drivers to balance with network needs. • Keep it simple, easy to maintain and straightforward. • State the facts in an easy to follow format. • Keep in mind many peers use translation tools in locations where English is not their first language. Overly complex ‘rules’ will only add to your overhead. • Attempt to convey URL in your. signature file as a FAQ to avoid rehash of common details. It can’t hurt!

Peeringdb. com – Use it. • Peeringdb. com is a valuable asset. • Keep

Peeringdb. com – Use it. • Peeringdb. com is a valuable asset. • Keep your info current. • Push Richard Steenbergen for new & improved features. • Cheers!