Peanut Drive T479 Pennsylvanias First Liquid Fuel Funded
- Slides: 35
Peanut Drive (T-479): Pennsylvania’s First Liquid Fuel Funded RCC Street Project Conewago Township, Adams County, PA Penn. DOT Engineering District 8 -0 Presentation courtesy of:
Introductions Ken Justice, PE Senior Director, Local Paving email: (215) 540 -9999 kjustice@nrmca. org
NRMCA Local Paving: Technical & Promotion Personnel Brian Killingsworth, P. E. Senior Vice President Division Head, Local Paving San Antonio, TX Glenn Ochsenreiter Senior Vice President, National Resources Silver Spring, MD Amanda Hult, P. E. Senior Director, Local Paving Lebanon, TN Jon Hansen Senior Vice President, Local Paving Pleasant Hill, IA Ken Justice, P. E. Senior Director, Local Paving Ambler, PA Phil Kresge Vice President, Local Paving Macungie, PA Don Clem, P. E. Vice President, Local Paving Denver, CO Julie Buffenbarger, FACI, LEED AP Senior Vice President, Local Paving Hinckley, OH
Local Paving Division: State and Regional Assignments
Peanut Drive RCC Street Project Conewago Township, Adams County, PA Penn. DOT Engineering District 8 -0
Peanut Drive RCC Street Project VIDEO https: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=9 Kc 232 Fz. ADk
Project Location
Project Location PEANUT DRIVE
Project Location
Phase I Existing Conditions – Repaired in 2013
Phase II Project Plans – Plan View 1, 500 LF Total
Phase II Project Plans – Plan View 1, 500 LF Total
Phase II Existing Conditions
Phase I/II Project Plans – HMA Section 4” Mill 1 - ½” Wearing Course 4” Binder Course 8” Aggregate Base Course
Phase II Project Plans – RCC Section(s) 1 - ½” Wearing Course 6” RCC Base 6”-8” Aggregate Base Course
Phase II Construction - 2014
Issues to Consider 1. Funding 2. Durability 3. Utility Maintenance 4. Traffic Volumes 5. Access During Curing 6. Benefits & QA/QC
Issues to Consider Funding: Issues with Liquid Fuel • Not initially recognized for use in Penn. DOTfunded projects • Township mandated to use Liquid Fuels due to PIB loan requirements • Pilot Project approval required to advance on original schedule
Issues to Consider Durability vs. Bituminous Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC)
Issues to Consider Durability • Township Adopted Five -Year Road Master Plan to Fund Street Projects • Enhanced Design Life Appealed to Township • Provides Opportunity to Gain Ground on Road Conditions
Issues to Consider Traffic Volumes • • Peanut Drive • Low volume • Opportunities to consider eliminating HMA Wearing Course Oxford Avenue • Future project high volume • Overall traffic heavy truck volume
Issues to Consider Utility Maintenance • Township altering protocol for street cut restoration by utilities (after RCC) • Additional planning and longer lead times to upgrade and maintain utilities (ahead of RCC placement)
Issues to Consider Access during Curing • HMA: soon as mat has cooled • RCC: recommended three day cure period
Issues to Consider Benefits & QA/QC • Ability to bridge weaker (Karst) areas in Township • Contractor availability/qualifications
Penn. DOT Pilot Project Penn. DOT Approval: 9/19/2014 Project Start: 10/16/2014 Project Complete: 10/31/2014
Penn. DOT Pilot Project Field Evaluation Program • Bi-annual reviews: distress assessment per Pub. 336 • Reviews to occur on both Phase I and II sections • Review to photo document conditions • Updated traffic counts (at time of review)
Penn. DOT Pilot Project Materials Testing Program • Verification of nonmovement in subbase (Proof Roll) • Nuclear Density Testing: dry density, % compaction and % moisture • Compressive Strength: Six Cylinders Tested at 3, 7, and 28 days)
Penn. DOT Pilot Project Nuclear Density Test Results
Penn. DOT Pilot Project Initial Testing Results 3 7 28
Penn. DOT Pilot Project Municipal Summary/Takeaways 1. Useful material to provide a durable road section for municipalities 2. Requires careful planning compared to HMA (access, utility, cost, and traffic volumes) 3. May provide a more “stable” unit cost for limited road budgets 4. Shows impressive early strength results (potential to be a better long-term investment)
Did Penn. DOT like the use of RCC?
Special thanks… Dan Moul Pennsylvania State Representative (91 st Legislative District) Bill Heape Conewago Enterprises, Inc. Mike Keiser Penn. DOT District 8 -0 Gary Tipton Penn. DOT Municipal Services Conewago Township Board & Staff
Kenneth Justice P. E. Senior Director – Local Paving kjustice@nrmca. or g 267 -716 -8675
QUESTIONS? ? ? Questions? ?
- Peanut butter dr jean
- Googlehttps://drive.google.com/drive/my-drive
- Slide to doc.com
- Google drive
- Example of pure liquid dielectric
- Liquid liquid extraction unit
- Cross belt drive
- Https drive google com file d 1zphjwy1qqf1g
- Https drive google com
- Difference between belt drive and chain drive
- Https drive google com drive u 0 recent
- Ngbs self funded
- Co-funded by the erasmus+ programme of the european union
- Co-funded by the erasmus+ programme of the european union
- Nongovernmental health agencies are funded primarily by:
- Self funded vs fully insured
- Action research
- This project has been funded by
- This project has been funded by
- This project is funded by the european union
- This project has been funded by contributions
- Self-funded pso
- This project is funded by the european union
- Giorgi kacharava
- This project is funded by the european union
- This project is funded by the european union
- This project is co-funded by the european union
- Co-funded by the erasmus+ programme of the european union
- This project is funded by the european union
- You gave me your peanut butter chocolate chip cookie
- Betty butter tongue twister
- Is chunky peanut butter homogeneous or heterogeneous
- Subtext example
- "you've got your chocolate in my peanut butter!"
- Peanut crunching crowd
- Private label jellies