PDMPLM 21 project CAD 20 project Jurgen De

PDM/PLM’ 21 project CAD’ 20 project Jurgen De Jonghe, EN-ACE Antonio Aversa, EN-ACE-CAE Aleksandra Wardzinska, EN-ACE-EDM

PDM/PLM’ 21 2016 Q 1 Q 2 2017 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2018 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2019 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2020 Q 3 Q 4 EYETS Q 1 Q 2 2021 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2022 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2023 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2024 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2025 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 LS 2 Q 2 2026 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2027 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 LS 3 D Perini, ? Software Dev Lifecycle Sync WP 1: Smar. Team–CDD Sync & Consolidation P Friman, A Wardzinska Survey POCs Replace Smar. Team + CDD + «EDMS PLM» Procure Unified Platform Requi reme Benchmar Procure king nts Implementation Deployment CATIA V 5 Replacement WP 2: Multi. CAD PDM & PLM Data Migration / Validation / Training Quality: Data, Processes, Methodology 2/27/2021 Document reference 3

Smar. Team 2 D Released over Time 30000 25000 2 D Released by automatic Life-Cycle Synchronization 20000 15000 10000 2 D Released in the New Life-Cycle 5000 2 D Released by manual Life-Cycle Synchronization 0 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 4

Smar. Team – CDD Synchronization 50000 45000 40000 Synchronization Candidates 35000 30000 25000 20000 2 D Released by Automatic and Manual Life-Cycle Synchronization 15000 10000 5000 0 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 5

Synchronization per Group 2/27/2021 Document reference 6

Synchronization Excel File & FAQ Ø An excel file has been published in EDMS, to help users Ø https: //cad-support. web. cern. ch/ (Updated this week!) Ø FAQ: https: //edms. cern. ch/ui/file/1815170/Last_released/1815170. pdf 7

Life-Cycle Training Ø Around 343 users trained so far: Ø Ø Ø existing users: dedicated ½ day training new users: part of standard CATIA-Smar. Team trainings New session(s) to come: Ø Ø Please sign-up, do not wait for the sessions to be scheduled in CTA The sessions are charged to the user’s section (since mid-November, 2017) 8

WP 2: Replace existing PDM tools 2016 Q 1 Q 2 2017 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2018 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2019 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2020 Q 3 Q 4 EYETS Q 1 Q 2 2021 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2022 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2023 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2024 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2025 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 LS 2 Q 2 2026 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2027 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 LS 3 D Perini, ? Software Dev Lifecycle Sync WP 1: Smar. Team–CDD Sync & Consolidation P Friman, A Wardzinska Survey POCs Replace Smar. Team + CDD + «EDMS as a PLM» Procure Unified Platform Requi reme. Benchmarking. Procure nts Implementation Deployment m. CAD Replacement WP 2: Multi. CAD PDM & PLM Data Migration / Validation / Training Quality: Data, Processes, Methodology 2/27/2021 Document reference 9

WP 2 Drivers / Why • Smar. Team end of support 2020 • Multiple systems used by Designer community: Smar. Team, CDD, EDMS − Challenging data synchronization (WP 1) − Usability − Heavy customization -> heavy maintenance • Multi. CAD support 2/27/2021 Document reference 10

WP 2 Goal / What • A new PDM/PLM Platform for the next 10 years and beyond • Smooth integration with CATIA V 5 • Replacing Smar. Team, CDD and some EDMS functionality • Multi. CAD support: REVIT and potential for CATIA V 5 successor 2/27/2021 Document reference 11

WP 2 Execution / How • Purchase process open to major PDM/PLM platforms Market Survey • • Test the candidates Proof Of Concept (POC) Involve the user community • Procurement Invitation to Tender • Configuration & data migration with assistance from selected vendor 2/27/2021 Document reference 12

Staged Implementation 2016 Q 1 Q 2 2017 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2018 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2019 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2020 Q 3 Q 4 EYETS Software Dev Q 1 Q 2 2021 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2022 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2023 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2024 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2025 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 LS 2 Q 2 2026 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 2027 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 LS 3 Lifecycle Sync WP 1: Smar. Team–CDD Sync & Consolidation Survey POCs Proc ure Replace (Implement) Smar. Team + CDD + «EDMS as a PLM» with new platform Unified Platform Require ments Benchmarking Procure Implementation WP 2: Multi. CAD PDM & PLM m. CAD Replacement Data Migration / Validation / Training Deployment Data Migration / Validation / Training Quality: Data, Processes, Methodology

Current status • Market Survey finalized, about to be published • Preparation for the POCs: • Definition of the scope, resources and evaluation criteria • Target timeline June 2018 – Q 1 2019 • Planned duration ~12 w per POC 2/27/2021 Document reference 14

Backup Slides 2/27/2021 Document reference 16

2018. . . Send DR Initial MS Workshop Provide Detailed POC description + Evaluation Criteria Improve MS + Qual. Criteria + Initial POC description Prepare Topics to be adressed for Vendor Demo Initiate MS Vendor Selection Vendor. Demo Get (Designer) Community Input Send Final MS Write IT Technical Specification Update Plan to Re-work Existing Functionality Send IT POC Vendor 2 Negotiate POC price Finalize MS Vendors Company Visits POC Vendor 1 Qualify Vendors POC Vendor 3 Vendor Technica l Scores POC Vendor 4 Put PDM/PLM Acquisition in Medium Term Plan Sprint 1 Sprint 2 … Sprint x t

PDM/PLM Platform Vendors • Dassault 3 DExperience: 8 th February (Helbling) • PTC Windchill (PDMLink): 26 th January (4 CAD) ? • Siemens Team. Center: ? (via Partner) • T-Systems + ARAS Innovator: ? • Auto. Desk Fusion Lifecycle: ? ? Source The Forrester Wave : Product Lifecycle Management for Discrete Manufacturers, Q 4 2017 27/02/2021 18