PayforPerformance Incentive Rewards Managing Human Resources Bohlander Snell
Pay-for-Performance: Incentive Rewards Managing Human Resources Bohlander • Snell © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 14 th edition Power. Point Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama
Strategic Reasons for Incentive Plans • Variable Pay Ø Tying pay to some measure of individual, group, or organizational performance. • Incentive Pay Programs Ø Emphasize a shared focus on organizational objectives. Ø Create shared commitment in that every individual contributes to organizational performance and success. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 2
Figure 10– 1 Types of Incentive Plans INDIVIDUAL GROUP ENTERPRISE Piecework Team compensation Profit sharing Standard hour plan Scanlon Plan Stock options Bonuses Rucker Plan Merit pay Improshare Employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) Lump-sum merit pay Earnings-at-risk plans Incentive awards Sales incentives Incentives for professional employees Executive compensation © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 3
Incentive Plans as Links to Organizational Objectives • Incentive Plan Purposes Ø Encourage employees to assume “ownership” of their jobs, thereby improving effort and job performance. Ø Motivate employees to expend more effort than under hourly and/or seniority-based compensation systems. Ø Support a compensation strategy to attract and retain top-performing employees. • Incentive Plan Effectiveness Ø There is evidence of a relationship between incentive plans and improved organizational performance. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 4
Figure 10– 2 Advantages of Incentive Pay Programs • Incentives focus employee efforts on specific performance targets. They provide real motivation that produces important employee and organizational gains. • Incentive payouts are variable costs linked to the achievement of results. Base salaries are fixed costs largely unrelated to output. • Incentives foster teamwork and unit cohesiveness when payments to individuals are based on team results. • Incentives are a way to distribute success among those responsible for producing that success. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 5
Employee Opposition to Incentive Plans • Production standards are set unfairly. • Incentive plans are really “work speedup. ” • Incentive plans create competition among workers. • Increased earnings result in tougher standards. • Payout formulas are complex and difficult to understand. • Incentive plans cause friction between employees and management. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 6
Individual Incentive Plans • Straight Piecework Ø An incentive plan under which employees receive a certain rate for each unit produced. • Differential Piece Rate Ø A compensation rate under which employees whose production exceeds the standard amount of output receive a higher rate for all of their work than the rate paid to those who do not exceed the standard amount. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 7
Computing the Piece Rate 60 minutes (per hour) 12 minutes(standard time per unit) $7. 50 (hourly rate) = 5 units per hour = $1. 50 per unit 5 units (per hour) © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 8
Piecework: The Drawbacks • Problems with piecework systems: Piecework standards can be difficult to develop. Individual contributions can be difficult measure. Not easily applied to work that is highly mechanized with little employee control over output. Piecework may conflict with organizational culture (teamwork) and/or group norms (“rate busting”). When quality is more important than quantity. When technology changes are frequent. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 9
Individual Incentive Plans: • Standard Hour Plan Ø An incentive plan that sets pay rates based on the completion of a job in a predetermined “standard time. ” Ø If employees finish the work in less than the expected time, their pay is still based on the standard time for the job multiplied by their hourly rate. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 10
Bonuses • Bonus Ø Incentive payment that is supplemental to the base wage for cost reduction, quality improvement, or other performance criteria. • Spot bonus Ø Unplanned bonus given for employee effort unrelated to an established performance measure. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 11
Merit Pay • Merit Pay Program (merit raise) Ø Links an increase in base pay to how successfully an employee achieved some objective performance standard. • Merit Guidelines Ø Guidelines for awarding merit raises that are tied to performance objectives. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 12
Highlights in HRM 3 Merit Pay Guidelines Chart A merit pay guidelines chart is a “lookup” table for awarding merit increases on the basis of (1) employee performance, (2) position in the pay range, (3) time since the last pay increase. Concerns: What should unsatisfactory performers be paid? What should average performers be paid? How much should superior or outstanding performers be paid? © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 13
Motivation Through Merit Raises • Develop employee confidence and trust in performance appraisal. • Establish job-related performance criteria. • Separate merit pay from regular pay. • Distinguish merit raises from cost-of-living raises. • Withhold merit payments when performance declines. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 14
Lump-Sum Merit Pay • Lump-sum Merit Program Ø Program under which employees receive a year-end merit payment, which is not added to their base pay. Ø Advantages v Provides financial control by maintaining annual salary expenses and not escalating base salary levels. v Contains employee benefit costs for levels of benefits normally calculated from current salary levels. v Provides a clear link between pay and performance. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 15
Incentive Awards and Recognition • Awards Ø Often used to recognize productivity gains, special contributions or achievements, and service to the organization. Ø Employees feel appreciated when employers tie awards to performance and deliver awards in a timely, sincere and specific way. • Noncash Incentive Awards Ø Are most effective as motivators when the award is combined with a meaningful employee recognition program. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 16
Sales Incentives Sales Incentive Plans Straight Salary Straight Commission Salary and Commission Combinations © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 17
Incentive Plans for Salespersons • Straight Salary Plan Ø Compensation plan that permits salespeople to be paid for performing various duties that are not reflected immediately in their sales volume. v Encourages building customer relationships. v Provides compensation during periods of poor sales. v May not provide sufficient motivation for maximizing sales volume. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 18
Incentive Plans for Salespersons • Straight Commission Plan Ø Compensation plan based upon a percentage of sales. v Draw is a cash advance that must be paid back as commissions are earned. Ø Disadvantages of straight commission incentive v Emphasis is on sales volume rather than on profits. v Customer service after the sale is neglected. v Earnings tend to fluctuate widely between good and poor periods of business. v Temptation to grant price concessions to get sales. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 19
Incentive Plans for Salespersons • Combined Salary and Commission Plan Ø A compensation plan that includes a straight salary and a commission component (“leverage”). Ø Advantages v Combines the advantages of straight salary and straight commission forms of compensation. v Offers greater design flexibility v Can be used to develop the most favorable ratio of selling expense to sales. v Motivates sales force to achieve specific company marketing objectives in addition to sales volume. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 20
Incentives for Professional Employees Managerial and Executive Incentives Bonuses and merit increases Double-track wage systems Performance incentive bonuses Profit sharing and stock ownership Executive perquisites (perks) © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 21
Executive Compensation • The Executive Pay Package Ø Base salary Ø Short-term incentives or bonuses Ø Long-term incentives or stock plans Ø Perquisites (perks) © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 22
Highlights in HRM 4 The “Sweetness” of Executive Perks • Company car • Spouse travel • Company plane • Physical exams • Executive eating facilities • Mobile phones • Financial consulting • Large insurance policies • Company-paid parking • Income tax preparation • Personal liability insurance • Country club membership • Estate planning • Luncheon club membership • First-class air travel • Personal home repairs • Home computers • Loans • Chauffeur service • Legal counseling • Children’s education • Vacation cabins © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 23
Group Incentive Plans • Team Incentive Plans Ø Compensation plans where all team members receive an incentive bonus payment when production or service standards are met or exceeded. • Establishing Team Incentive Payments Ø Set performance measures upon which incentive payments are based Ø Determine the size of the incentive bonus. Ø Create a payout formula and fully explain to employees how payouts will be distributed. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 24
Group Incentive Plans (cont’d) • Gainsharing Plans Ø Programs under which both employees and the organization share the financial gains according to a predetermined formula that reflects improved productivity and profitability. Scanlon v Rucker v Improshare v © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 25
Figure 10– 4 The Pros and Cons of Team Incentive Plans PROS • Team incentives support group planning and problem solving, thereby building a team culture. • The contributions of individual employees depend on group cooperation. • Unlike incentive plans based solely on output, team incentives can broaden the scope of the contribution that employees are motivated to make. • Team bonuses tend to reduce employee jealousies and complaints over “tight” or “loose” individual standards. • Team incentives encourage cross-training and the acquiring of new interpersonal competencies. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 26
Figure 10– 4 The Pros and Cons of Team Incentive Plans (cont’d) CONS • Individual team members may perceive that “their” efforts contribute little to team success or to the attainment of the incentive bonus. • Intergroup social problems—pressure to limit performance (for example, team members are afraid one individual may make the others look bad) and the “free-ride” effect (one individual puts in less effort than others but shares equally in team rewards)—may arise. • Complex payout formulas can be difficult for team members to understand. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 27
Employee Bonus and Gainsharing Plans Scanlon Plan Rewards come from employee participation in improving productivity and reducing costs. Rucker Plan (SOP) Shared rewards come from the difference between labor costs and sales value of production. Improshare Gainsharing based on increases in productivity of the standard hour output of work teams. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 28
Figure 10– 5 Scanlon Plan Suggestion Process © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 29
Enterprise Incentive Plans • Profit Sharing Ø Any procedure by which an employer pays, or makes available to all regular employees, in addition to their base pay, current or deferred sums based upon the profits of the enterprise. Ø Challenges: v Agreement over division of profits between company and employees. v Possibility of no payout due to financial condition of company. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 30
Enterprise Incentive Plans (cont’d) • Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) Ø Stock plans in which an organization contributes shares of its stock to an established trust for the purpose of stock purchases by its employees. v Stock bonus plans are funded by direct employer contributions of its stock or cash to purchase its stock. v Leveraged plans are funded by employer borrowing to purchase its stock for the ESOP. © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 31
Employee Stock Ownership Plans Rew ard s an d Ri sks o f E S O P S Advantages Disadvantages Retirement benefits Liquidity and value Pride of ownership Single funding basis Deferred taxes Not insured © 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 10– 32
- Slides: 32