Particles and Fields Package PFP Instrument Preliminary Design

Particles and Fields Package (PFP) Instrument Preliminary Design Review Management David Curtis, PF Package Manager PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 1

The PF Package SWEA Solar Wind Ion Analyzer (SWIA) – SSL LPW (2) Solar Wind Electron Analyzer (SWEA) – CESR / SSL LPW-EUVM MAG (2) SWIA SEP (2) STATIC Langmuir Probe and Waves (LPW) – LASP / SSL LPW/Extreme Ultra-Violet (LPW-EUV) – LASP Solar Energetic Particle Detector (SEP) – SSL Magnetometer (MAG) – GSFC Supra-Thermal and Thermal Ion Composition (STATIC) SSL PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 2

PFP Block Diagram 10 cm PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 3

MAVEN PFP Org Chart MAVEN Project PI: Bruce Jakoski (LASP) PM: David Mitchell (GSFC) MAVEN Deputy PI, PFP PI Robert Lin PFP Science Team: Jim Mc. Fadden Dave Mitchell Davin Larson Jasper Halekas Greg Delory Janet Luhmann Jack Connerney (GSFC) Robert Ergun (LASP) PFDPU EE: Gordon ME: Donakowski FSW: Harvey PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 STATIC Sci: Mc. Fadden EE: Sterling ME: Dalton UCB Support: SPO , EH&S, Purchasing, Financial PF Package Manager David Curtis Management Team: Financial: Harps Schedule: Meilhan Mission Assurance & Safety Jorg Fischer Systems: EE: Curtis ME: Turin Power Systems: Berg SWIA Sci: Halekas EE: Taylor ME: Dalton SWEA Sci: Mitchell EE: Taylor ME: Turin SWEA (CESR) Sci: Mazelle SEP Sci: Larson EE: Hatch ME: Glaser LPW (LASP) Sci: Ergun Mgr: Westfall LPW (SSL) Sci: Delory ME: Mc. Cauley EE: Sterling MAG (GSFC) Sci: Connerney Mgr: Oliversen 4

PFP Responsibilities PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 5

Contracting • Phase C/D Contracts in place – SSL and LASP/LPW independently contracted to GSFC for MAVEN PFP – Internal Funds Transfers from MAVEN Project to GSFC/MAG – CESR/SWEA funded by CNES, contributed hardware to SSL • SSL Manages PFP development in collaboration with MAVEN Project Office – SSL Coordinates PFP Team • Schedules, Planning, Interfaces, Technical Resources, Risk Management, etc. – A common Instrument Manager at GSFC facilitates coordination of contracts, deliverables, funding PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 6

Team Experience • SSL has a long history of successful development of instrument suites: – Wind 3 DP (5), FAST (5), MO/MGS/LP MAG/ER (2), STEREO IMPACT (7*2), THEMIS (5*5) • Team is experienced working together: – SSL w/ GSFC, Acuna/Connerney, MAG: MO, MGS, LP, STEREO – SSL w/ LASP, Ergun, LPW: FAST, THEMIS – SSL w/CESR, Reme/Sauvaud/Mazelle, ESAs: Giotto RPA, Wind 3 DP, Cluster CIS, MO/MGS MAG/ER, STEREO IMPACT SWEA – SSL w/ Lockheed Spacecraft: MGS, LP • Centuries of experience building spaceflight instrumentation in the PFP team PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 7

Staffing • PFP Org Chart fully populated – SSL is working on hiring an additional member of the QA team to bring it up to full strength due to a recent retirement – LASP is working on hiring an additional systems person to help with the increased load in Phase C/D such as EVM • Ramp-up has been somewhat slower than anticipated, but we have kept up with the work load and are ready for PDR on schedule PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 8

Communications - Meetings • Participate in Project and LM Meetings: – – – – – Weekly Management Tag-Up telecon Weekly System Design Team telecon Weekly Electromagnetics Working Group telecon Weekly Payload telecon ~Weekly Project CCB and LM ECB meetings Monthly PFP Management Reviews Monthly PFP Flight Software Status telecon Quarterly Status Reviews & Science Working Group Other meetings as needed: Operations, Planetary Protection, PCB, SMA, etc • Internal Meetings – Weekly team meetings – Weekly instrument-level meetings PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 9

Communications - Documents • Periodic Reporting: – PFP Monthly & Quarterly Status Reports – PFP Monthly & Quarterly 533 financials – PFP Monthly Schedule updates • PFP Plans and other deliverables • Document Databases: – Project MIS Database & Configuration Control System • Submit deliverables, CCRs, etc • Interact with CCR process • Access Project Documents – PFP open-access ftp site for Documents & Configuration Control • ftp: //apollo. ssl. berkeley. edu/pub/MAVEN/ • Released documents, drawings, technical notes • Separate, access controlled site for the few ITAR-controlled and proprietary documents we get PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 10

PFP Plans • • • • • MAVEN_PF_MGT_001 – SSL WBS & Dictionary MAVEN_PF_MGT_003 – Descopes List MAVEN_PF_QA_002 – Mission Assurance Implementation Plan MAVEN_PF_QA_001 – Mission Assurance Compliance Matrix 001_PA Plan - CESR SWEA Performance Assurance Plan MAVEN-RSS-PLAN-0038 – LASP RSS&LPW MAIP MAVEN-MAG-PLAN-0058 – MAG MAIP MAVEN_PF_QA_005 – Safety Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_006 – Gold Rule Compliance Matrix MAVEN_PF_SYS_008 – Software Development Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_009 – System Engineering Management Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_011 – Configuration Management Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_012 – Risk Management Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_018 – IT Security Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_020 – Fault Management Description Document MAVEN_PF_SYS_023 – Verification & Validation Plan MAVEN_PF_SYS_024 – Integration and Test Plan PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 11

PFP Requirements, Specifications, ICDs • • • • • • MAVEN-PFIS-RQMT-0016 – PFP Functional (Level 3 ) Requirements MAVEN-SC-ICD-0007 – PFP to Spacecraft ICD MAVEN_PF_SYS_010 – Flight Software Requirements (L 4) MAVEN_PF_FSW_002 – Software Requirements Specification (L 5) MAVEN_PF_SYS_004 – PFDPU to Instruments ICD MAVEN_PF_SYS_003 – Power Converter Requirements MAVEN_PF_PFDPU_001 – Data Controller Board Specification MAVEN_PF_LPW_001 – LPW Specification (L 4) MAVEN_PF_SEP_001 – SEP Specification (L 4) MAVEN_PF_STATIC_001 – STATIC Specification (L 4) MAVEN_PF_SWEA_001 – SWEA CESR to SSL ICD MAVEN_PF_SWEA_002 – SWEA Specification (L 4) MAVEN_PF_SWIA_001 – SWIA Specification (L 4) MAVEN-RQMT-9999 - MAVEN Magnetometer Specification (L 4) MAVEN_PF_SYS_013 – Harnessing Drawing MAVEN_PF_SYS_016 – Connector Pinouts MAVEN_PF_PFDPU_002 – PFDPU PC 104 Connector Pinouts MAVEN_PFDPU-002 – PFDPU Board Outlines MAVEN_PF_SYS_024 – Drawing Tree Various – FPGA Specifications Various – Mechanical ICD Drawings PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 12

PFP Analyses • • MAVEN_PF_QA_004 – Fault Tree Analysis MAVEN_PF_QA_007 – FMEA / CIL / CICP MAVEN_PF_QA_008 – Limited Life Items List MAVEN_PF_QA_009 – Preliminary Hazard Analysis Several – MAVEN PFP Component Thermal Models MAVEN_PF_QA_003 – Preliminary EEE Parts List MAVEN_PF_QA_010 – SSL Materials & Process List 008, 009 – CESR Materials & Process List PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 13

Descope Plans • Descope plan under Project Control • PFP potential Descope list provided to project • Some $, Mass, Power savings potential at the cost of science or reliability • $ savings potential starting to drop off as we pass PDR PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 14

Engineering Peer Reviews • A full set of PFP peer reviews was held including: – SWEA at CESR, 2010 -02 -03 – SSL Mechanical / Thermal, 2010 -05 -10 • SWIA, STATIC, SEP, PFDPU, LPW, SWEA Electronics – SSL Analyzers & Front end electronics, 2010 -05 -11 • SWIA, STATIC, SEP – SSL Power Converters, 2010 -05 -11 • PFDPU, SWEA, SWIA, STATIC LVPS • SWIA, STATIC HVPS – SSL Digital / FPGA, 2010 -05 -12 • PFDPU, SWEA, SWIA, STATIC, SEP – Flight Software, 2010 -05 -12 – LASP LPW, 2010 -05 -15 – GSFC MAG, 2010 -05 -25 • Very helpful informal technical interchanges with independent review teams • Materials, Attendance, RFAs, Reports, RFA Responses posted to MIS PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 15

Peer Review RFA Summary • Recommendations closed by concurrence of review lead, PFP PM • Actions closed by concurrence of Review Chair • Details of actions in following presentations PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 16

Management Metrics • Schedule – Schedule updated monthly or more • Provided monthly to Project – – • Schedule slack (per instrument and critical path) Task slippage Historical problem spots Walk Around Financial – Spending tracked monthly by WBS element (instrument) • Cost vs Budget (spending rate and total) • 533 provided monthly to Project – Project will start doing EVM in Phase C/D • SSL contract is below the EVM threshold, but SSL will benefit from Project EVM analysis results based on SSL inputs • Technical – Resource margins updated monthly (mass, power, processor) • Provided to Project as part of Monthly Status Report • Project CCR process for changes to NTE • Gold Rule Contingency levels maintained per development phase – Risk Levels from Risk Management System, updated monthly • Provided to Project as part of Monthly Status Report – Technical Issues • Gleaned from weekly team & instrument meetings • Provided to Project as part of Monthly Status Report PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 17

Configuration Management • Project Configuration Management Plan defines Level 1 change control process – Level 1 changes affect Project configured documents, resources, cost, schedule milestones, contractual items, risk – PFP PM part of CCB process for changes impacting PFP • Approved PFP Configuration Management Plan defines Level 2 change control process – PFP PM chairs PFP CCB • Determines what changes need to be elevated to Level 1 – Discusses any marginal changes with Project to determine classification • Approves changes that are Level 2 • Maintains configured database of documents on ftp site – PFP PM delegates lower level change authority to leads • Changes that don’t impact resources, configured items, level 4 requirements, interfaces, cost, or schedule PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 18

Risk Management • Project Risk Management Plan describes Project-Level system • Approved PFP Risk Management Plan describes how PFP Risk Management Processes work – Supports Project Risk Management Process – Collects risk inputs from all members of the PFP team on a monthly basis – Identifies Risk Areas for PFP mitigation or elevation to the Project level – Tracks risks to closure • LASP tracks and reports LASP/LPW risks separately per their plan • FSW tracks software risks separately and reports to PM for possible inclusion with other risks PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 19

Current Top PFP Risks PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 20

Risk List [1] PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 21

Risk List [2] PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 22

Lessons Learned • Extensive PFP Team Experience provides both firsthand institutional lessons learned input into designs and plans for MAVEN • Institutional and NASA experience is drawn from via informal discussions, peer reviews, and formal reviews • NASA Lessons Learned database has been scanned for applicable lessons for PFP – For example #0585 about staff continuity on rapid development projects (MGS, Pathfinder) is central to the PFP plans (in fact this is standard practice at SSL) PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 23

PFP Schedule Maintenance • PFP Schedules maintained by institution – SSL, LASP/LPW, GSFC/MAG, CESR/SWEA – Delivered monthly to Project for integration into MAVEN IMS – Linked by fixed milestones which cannot be changed without by all parties affected – LASP/LPW schedule currently still part of SSL schedule, maintained by coordination between SSL and LASP • LPW to take over their part of the schedule shortly to prepare for EVM • • SSL+LASP Schedule contains ~1300 tasks GSFC Schedule contains ~80 tasks CESR schedule contains ~30 tasks SSL schedule maintained by dedicated scheduler – Polls instrument team weekly on progress – Coordinates with GSFC, CESR, LASP – Provides reports to PM, GSFC PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 24

MAVEN PFP Schedule • • • SRA August 2009 Instrument PDR June 14 -16 2010 Mission PDR July 12 -16 2010 CDR July 2011 PFP PER May 2012 PFP PSR, Delivery August 2012 Launch November 2013 Arrive at Mars September 2014 End on nominal mission October 2015 PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 25

Schedule Summary, PDR to CDR PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 26

Schedule Summary, CDR to Delivery PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 27

Schedule Margins • PDR to CDR margin – 4. 2 weeks – Out of 1 year • FM Instrument deliveries to PFP Integration margin – – – – MAG – 12. 4 weeks LPW – 6 weeks to delivery from LASP plus 5. 4 weeks to PFDPU SEP – 10. 4 weeks SWEA – 11. 4 weeks SWIA – 10. 4 weeks STATIC – 10. 4 weeks PFDPU – 11. 4 weeks • PFP Integration to Ship margin – STATIC – 5 weeks – PFP (except STATIC) – 4 weeks • So 14. 4 weeks minimum CDR-Delivery – Out of 16 months – Critical Path currently through instruments with longest calibrations • SEP, STATIC, SWIA PFP IPDR 2010/6/14 - 16 28