Particle propertiescharacteristics specifically their interactions are often interpreted

  • Slides: 39
Download presentation
Particle properties/characteristics specifically their interactions are often interpreted in terms of CROSS SECTIONS.

Particle properties/characteristics specifically their interactions are often interpreted in terms of CROSS SECTIONS.

For elastically scattered projectiles: Ef , pf Ei , pi EN , p. N

For elastically scattered projectiles: Ef , pf Ei , pi EN , p. N The recoiling particles are identical to the incoming particles but are in different quantum states The initial conditions may be precisely The simple 2 -body kinematics of scattering knowable fixes the energy of particles scattered through . only classically!

Nuclear Reactions Besides his famous scattering of particles off gold and lead foil, Rutherford

Nuclear Reactions Besides his famous scattering of particles off gold and lead foil, Rutherford observed the transmutation: or, if you prefer Whenever energetic particles (from a nuclear reactor or an accelerator) irradiate matter there is the possibility of a nuclear reaction

Classification of Nuclear Reactions • inelastic scattering individual collisions between the incoming projectile and

Classification of Nuclear Reactions • inelastic scattering individual collisions between the incoming projectile and a single target nucleon; the incident particle emerges with reduced energy • pickup reactions incident projectile collects additional nucleons from the target 16 O + d 158 O + 31 H (d, 3 H) 8 Ca + 32 He 40 Ca + 20 41 20 (3 He, ) • stripping reactions incident projectile leaves one or more nucleons behind in the target 90 91 (d, p) 40 Zr + d 40 Zr + p 3 He, d) 23 3 24 ( 11 Na + 2 He 12 Mg + d

[ 20 10 Ne]*

[ 20 10 Ne]*

The cross section is defined by the ratio rate particles are scattered out of

The cross section is defined by the ratio rate particles are scattered out of beam rate of particles focused onto target material/unit area a “counting” experiment notice it yields a measure, in units of area number of scattered particles/sec incident particles/(unit area sec) target site density how tightly focused or intense the beam is density of nuclear targets With a detector fixed to record data from a particular location , we measure the “differential” cross section: d /d.

Incident mono-energetic beam v t scattered particles A d N = number density in

Incident mono-energetic beam v t scattered particles A d N = number density in beam (particles per unit volume) N number of scattering centers in target intercepted by beamspot Solid angle d represents detector counting the d. N particles per unit time that scatter through into d FLUX = # of particles crossing through unit cross section per sec = Nv t A / t A = Nv Notice: q. Nv we call current, I, measured in Coulombs. d. N N F d. W d. N = s( )N F d W d. N = N F d s

d. N = FN s( )d W N F d s(q) the “differential” cross

d. N = FN s( )d W N F d s(q) the “differential” cross section R R R

the differential solid angle d for integration is sin d R Rsin d Rd

the differential solid angle d for integration is sin d R Rsin d Rd Rsin Rd

Symmetry arguments allow us to immediately integrate out and consider rings defined by alone

Symmetry arguments allow us to immediately integrate out and consider rings defined by alone R Rsin d R R R Integrated over all solid angles Nscattered = N F ds TOTAL

The scattering rate Nscattered = N F ds TOTAL per unit time Particles IN

The scattering rate Nscattered = N F ds TOTAL per unit time Particles IN (per unit time) = F Area(of beam spot) Particles scattered OUT (per unit time) = F Ns TOTAL

Earth Moon

Earth Moon

Earth Moon

Earth Moon

for some sense of spacing consider the ratio orbital diameters central body diameter ~

for some sense of spacing consider the ratio orbital diameters central body diameter ~ 10 s for moons/planets ~100 s for planets orbiting sun In a solid • interatomic spacing: 1 -5 Å (1 -5 10 -10 m) • nuclear radii: 1. 5 -5 Å (1. 5 -5 10 -15 m) the ratio orbital diameters ~ 66, 666 for atomic electron central body diameter orbitals to their own nucleus Carbon Oxygen Aluminum Iron Copper Lead 6 C 8 O 13 Al 26 Fe 29 Cu 82 Pb

A solid sheet of lead offers how much of a (cross sectional) physical target

A solid sheet of lead offers how much of a (cross sectional) physical target (and how much empty space) to a subatomic projectile? 207 Pb 82 w Number density, n: number of individual atoms (or scattering centers!) per unit volume n= NA / A where NA = Avogadro’s Number A = atomic weight (g) = density (g/cc) n= (11. 3 g/cc)(6. 02 1023/mole)/(207. 2 g/mole) = 3. 28 1022/cm 3

207 Pb 82 w For a thin enough layer n (Volume) (atomic cross section)

207 Pb 82 w For a thin enough layer n (Volume) (atomic cross section) = n (surface area w)(pr 2) as a fraction of the target’s area: = n (w)p(5 10 -13 cm)2 For 1 mm sheet of lead: 1 cm sheet of lead: 0. 00257 0. 0257

Actually a projectile “sees” nw nuclei per unit area but Znw electrons per unit

Actually a projectile “sees” nw nuclei per unit area but Znw electrons per unit area!

that general description of cross section let’s augmented with the specific example of Coulomb

that general description of cross section let’s augmented with the specific example of Coulomb scattering

q 1 q 2 BOTH target and projectile will move in response to the

q 1 q 2 BOTH target and projectile will move in response to the forces between them. Recoil of target q 1 But here we are interested only in the scattered projectile

impact parameter, b

impact parameter, b

 b q 2 d A beam of N incident particles strike a (thin

b q 2 d A beam of N incident particles strike a (thin foil) target. The beam spot (cross section of the beam) illuminates n scattering centers. If d. N counts the average number of particles scattered between and d using d. N/N = n d d = 2 b db becomes:

 b q 2 d and so

b q 2 d and so

 b q 2 d

b q 2 d

What about the ENERGY LOST in the collision? • the recoiling target carries energy

What about the ENERGY LOST in the collision? • the recoiling target carries energy • some of the projectile’s energy was surrendered • if the target is heavy • the recoil is small • the energy loss is insignificant Reminder: 1/ (3672 Z)

mvf mv 0 mvf ( (mv) = - mv 0 recoil momentum of target

mvf mv 0 mvf ( (mv) = - mv 0 recoil momentum of target ) • large impact parameter b For small scattering ( ) and/or • large projectile speed v 0 vf vo

mvf /2 mv 0 Together with: Recognizing that all charges are simple multiples of

mvf /2 mv 0 Together with: Recognizing that all charges are simple multiples of the fundamental unit of the electron charge e, we write q 1 = Z 1 e q 2 = Z 2 e p

Recalling that kinetic energy K = ½mv 2 = (mv)2/(2 m) the transmitted kinetic

Recalling that kinetic energy K = ½mv 2 = (mv)2/(2 m) the transmitted kinetic energy (the energy lost in collision to the target) K = ( p)2/(2 mtarget)

Z 2≡Atomic Number, the number of protons (or electrons) q 2=Z 2 e q

Z 2≡Atomic Number, the number of protons (or electrons) q 2=Z 2 e q 1=Z 1 e

For nuclear collisions: mtarget 2 Z 2 mproton For collisions with atomic electrons: mtarget

For nuclear collisions: mtarget 2 Z 2 mproton For collisions with atomic electrons: mtarget melectron q 1 = e

For nuclear collisions: mtarget 2 Z 2 mproton For collisions with atomic electrons: mtarget

For nuclear collisions: mtarget 2 Z 2 mproton For collisions with atomic electrons: mtarget melectron q 1 = e Z 2 times as many of these occur!

mproton = 0. 000 000 001 6748 kg melectron = 0. 000 000 0009

mproton = 0. 000 000 001 6748 kg melectron = 0. 000 000 0009 kg The energy loss due to collisions with electrons is GREATER by a factor of

Notice this simple approximation shows that Why are a-particles “more ionizing” than b-particles?

Notice this simple approximation shows that Why are a-particles “more ionizing” than b-particles?

energy loss speed

energy loss speed

the probability that a particle, entering a target volume with energy E “collides” within

the probability that a particle, entering a target volume with energy E “collides” within and loses an amount of energy between E' and E' + d. E' P (E, E' ) d. E' dx ( 2 pb db ) ( dx NA Z/A ) Or P (E, E' ) d. E' dx = P 1 / (E')2

-d. E/dx = (4 p. Noz 2 e 4/mev 2)(Z/A)[ln{2 mev 2/I(1 -b 2)}-b

-d. E/dx = (4 p. Noz 2 e 4/mev 2)(Z/A)[ln{2 mev 2/I(1 -b 2)}-b 2] I = mean excitation (ionization) potential of atoms in target ~ Z 10 Ge. V Felix Bloch 103 Hans Bethe Range of d. E/dx for proton through various materials d. E/dx ~ 1/b 2 102 H 2 gas target 101 Pb target Logarithmic rise 100 101 102 E (Me. V) 104 105 106

bg Muon momentum [Ge. V/c] Particle Data Group, R. M. Barnett et al. ,

bg Muon momentum [Ge. V/c] Particle Data Group, R. M. Barnett et al. , Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 1; Eur. Phys. J. C 3 (1998)

D. R. Nygren, J. N. Marx, Physics Today 31 (1978) 46 d. E/dx(ke. V/cm)

D. R. Nygren, J. N. Marx, Physics Today 31 (1978) 46 d. E/dx(ke. V/cm) m p a p d e Momentum [Ge. V/c]