Partial Molar Quantities and the Chemical Potential Lecture

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
Partial Molar Quantities and the Chemical Potential Lecture 6

Partial Molar Quantities and the Chemical Potential Lecture 6

Partial Molar Quantities • Now that we have introduced the mole fraction, X, and

Partial Molar Quantities • Now that we have introduced the mole fraction, X, and variable composition, we want to know how the variables of our system, e. g. , V, S, change as we change composition. o These are partial molar quantities, usually indicated by the lower case letter. • For example: o Such that • This is the partial molar volume of component i. For example, the partial molar volume of O 2 dissolved in seawater. o This tell us how the volume of water changes for an addition of dissolved O 2 holding T, P, and the amounts of everything else constant.

Partial Molar Volumes of Ethanol and Water • If you add a shot (3

Partial Molar Volumes of Ethanol and Water • If you add a shot (3 oz) of rum to 12 oz of Coca Cola, what will be the volume of your ‘rum ‘n coke’? • Less than 15 oz! Blame chemistry, not the bartender.

Other Partial Molar Quantities • We can also define partial molar quantities of othermodynamic

Other Partial Molar Quantities • We can also define partial molar quantities of othermodynamic variables, such as entropy, and enthalpy. • One partial molar quantity is particularly useful, that of the Gibbs Free Energy.

Chemical Potential • The chemical potential is defined as partial molar Gibbs Free Energy:

Chemical Potential • The chemical potential is defined as partial molar Gibbs Free Energy: such that o or, dividing each side by the total number of moles: • The chemical potential tells us how the Gibbs Free Energy will vary with the number of moles, ni, of component i holding temperature, pressure, and the number of moles of all other components constant. • For a pure substance, the chemical potential is equal to its molar Gibbs Free Energy (also the molar Helmholtz Free Energy):

Gibbs Free Energy Again • In Chapter 2, we found that the Gibbs Free

Gibbs Free Energy Again • In Chapter 2, we found that the Gibbs Free Energy change of a system (and we are only interested in changes, not absolute amounts) was given by: d. G = Vd. P – Sd. T o (you need to memorize this equation – think about units and how free energy is minimized when entropy is maximized. ) • We also said that for a reaction at constant temperature and pressure: ∆Gr = ∆Hr – T∆Sr • These equation hold for a system of fixed composition. Where composition can vary, we need to modify them to account for that variance.

 • The total Gibbs free energy of a system will depend upon composition

• The total Gibbs free energy of a system will depend upon composition as well as on temperature and pressure. The Gibbs free energy change of a phase of variable composition is fully expressed as: • Now consider exchange of component i between two phases, α and βholding all else constant; then: • For a closed system: • At equilibrium (d. G = 0), then: In a system at equilibrium, the chemical potential of every component in a phase is equal to the chemical potential of that component in every other phase in which that component is present.

Gibbs-Duhem Equation • The Free Energy of a system (or phase) is the sum

Gibbs-Duhem Equation • The Free Energy of a system (or phase) is the sum of chemical potentials of its components: • Differentiating: • Equating with the earlier equation: • We can rearrange this as the Gibbs-Duhem Equation:

Interpreting Gibbs. Duhem • In a closed system at equilibrium, net changes in chemical

Interpreting Gibbs. Duhem • In a closed system at equilibrium, net changes in chemical potential will occur only as a result of changes in temperature or pressure. At constant temperature and pressure, there can be no net change in chemical potential at equilibrium: • This equation further tells us that the chemical potentials do not vary independently, but change in a related way.

Final point about chemical potential: In spontaneous processes, components or species are distributed between

Final point about chemical potential: In spontaneous processes, components or species are distributed between phases so as to minimize the chemical potential of all components.

Ideal Solutions

Ideal Solutions

Chemical Potential in Ideal Solutions • In terms of partial molar quantities • For

Chemical Potential in Ideal Solutions • In terms of partial molar quantities • For an ideal gas: • Integrating from P˚ to P: • Where P˚ is the pressure of pure substance in its ‘standard state’ and µ˚ is the chemical potential of i in that state. In that case, P/P˚ = Xi and:

 • This equation tells us that in an ideal solution: the chemical potential

• This equation tells us that in an ideal solution: the chemical potential of component i is always less than that of pure i, since X is by definition less than 1 and hence ln X is negative. o the chemical potential of component i increases linearly with the log of its concentration in the solution. o

Volume and enthalpy changes of solutions • Water–alcohol is an example of a non-ideal

Volume and enthalpy changes of solutions • Water–alcohol is an example of a non-ideal solution. The volume is expressed as: • ∆Vmixing term may be negative, as in rum ‘n coke. • Similarly, mix nitric acid and water and the solution gets hot – that thermal energy is the enthapy of mixing. Enthalpy of solutions is expressed as: o The ∆H term is positive in the nitric acid case. • For ideal solutions, however, ∆Vmixing = ∆Hmixing = 0

Entropy changes of solution • What about entropy and free energy changes of ideal

Entropy changes of solution • What about entropy and free energy changes of ideal solutions? • Even in ideal solutions, there is an entropy change (increase) because we have increased the randomness of the system. • The entropy change of ideal solution is: o Note similarity to configurational entropy. o Note negative sign. How will entropy change? • The total (molar) entropy of an ideal solution is then:

What does this tell us about how Gibbs Free Energy will change in a

What does this tell us about how Gibbs Free Energy will change in a ideal solution? ∆Gr = ∆Hr – T∆Sr

Free Energy Change of Solution ∆Gmixing = ∆Hmixing - T∆Smixing • For an ideal

Free Energy Change of Solution ∆Gmixing = ∆Hmixing - T∆Smixing • For an ideal solution, ∆Hmixing = 0 • And • Because the log term is always negative, ideal solutions have lower free energy than a mixture of their pure constituents and ∆G decreases with increasing T. This is why things are usually more soluble at higher T. • Total Free Energy of an ideal solution is:

Total Free Energy of an Ideal Solution • Recalling that • We can substitute

Total Free Energy of an Ideal Solution • Recalling that • We can substitute • Into the above and obtain: and

Total Free Energy of an Ideal Solution • • The Free Energy of a

Total Free Energy of an Ideal Solution • • The Free Energy of a solution is simply the sum of the chemical potentials of the components times their mole fractions. (Note that I have shortened the subscript from ideal solution to simply ideal). Since • This equation is entirely equivalent to the one we previously derived: • The first term on the right is the sum of the contribution of the chemical potentials of the pure components. The second term on the right is the decrease in free energy that comes from the increase in entropy. • o • The second term on the right will always be negative because the mole fractions are by definition less than 1, hence their logs are always negative. Equivalently:

Let’s now see what happens to Free Energy when we dissolve component 2 in

Let’s now see what happens to Free Energy when we dissolve component 2 in component 1 to create an ideal solution at various temperatures Recall: The change due to solution is simply the second term on the right:

Free Energy of Mixing in an Ideal Solution

Free Energy of Mixing in an Ideal Solution

Mixing and Mixture • We are calling the reduction in free energy due only

Mixing and Mixture • We are calling the reduction in free energy due only to dissolving one component in another ∆Gideal mixing. • Once again, mixtures are not solutions. • In our equation: • The first term on the right is the free energy of the mixture: it is simply the sum of the molar free energies (or equivalently the chemical potentials) of the pure components weighted by their mole fractions. • Again, the second term arises from the increase in entropy that occurs when we create a true solution.

Method of Intercepts • Consider a two- component ideal solution so that X 1

Method of Intercepts • Consider a two- component ideal solution so that X 1 = (1 -X 2). Since: • Then: G = µ 1[(1 -X 2) +µ 2 X 2 = µ 1 + (µ 2 - µ 1)X 2 o This is the equation of a straight line (dashed on the figure) on a G-bar–X 2 plot. • We can use it to extrapolate to chemical potentials of our two components in the solution.