Parenteral Nutrition Graphic source http www rxkinetics comtpntutorial14
- Slides: 78
Parenteral Nutrition Graphic source: http: //www. rxkinetics. com/tpntutorial/1_4. html
Parenteral Nutrition (Definition) ¨ Components are in elemental or “pre- digested” form – Protein as amino acids – CHO as dextrose – Fat as lipid emulsion – Electrolytes, vitamins and minerals
Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Definition ¨ Delivery of nutrients intravenously, e. g. via the bloodstream. – Central Parenteral Nutrition: often called Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN); delivered into a central vein – Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition (PPN): delivered into a smaller or peripheral vein A. S. P. E. N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual, 2 nd edition, 2005, p. 97
Indications for PN (ASPEN) ¨ When Specialized Nutrition Support (SNS) is indicated, EN should generally be used in preference to PN. (B) ¨ When SNS is indicated, PN should be used when the gastrointestinal tract is not functional or cannot be accessed and in patients who cannot be adequately nourished by oral diets or EN. (B) ¨ The anticipated duration of PN should be >7 days ASPEN Board of Directors. JPEN 26; 19 SA, 2002. ; ASPEN Nutrition Support Practice Manual, 2005, p. 108
EN vs PN in Critical Care (EAL) ¨ R. 1. If the critically ill ICU patient is hemodynamically stable with a functional GI tract, then EN is recommended over PN. ¨ Patients who received EN experienced less septic morbidity and fewer infectious complications than patients who received PN. Strong, Conditional ADA Evidence Analysis Library, accessed 8/07
EN vs PN in Critical Care (EAL) ¨ In the critically ill patient, EN is associated with significant cost savings when compared to PN. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the impact of EN or PN on LOS and mortality. Strong, Conditional ADA Evidence Analysis Library, accessed 8/07
Common Indications for PN ¨ Patient has failed EN with appropriate tube placement ¨ Severe acute pancreatitis ¨ Severe short bowel syndrome ¨ Mesenteric ischemia ¨ Paralytic ileus ¨ Small bowel obstruction ¨ GI fistula unless enteral access can be placed distal to the fistula or where volume of output warrants trial of EN Adapted from Mirtallo in ASPEN, The Science and Practice of Nutrition Support: A Case. Based Core Curriculum. 2001.
Contraindications ¨ Functional and accessible GI tract ¨ Patient is taking oral diet ¨ Prognosis does not warrant aggressive nutrition support (terminally ill) ¨ Risk exceeds benefit ¨ Patient expected to meet needs within 14 days
PN Central Access ¨ May be delivered via femoral lines, internal jugular lines, and subclavian vein catheters in the hospital setting ¨ Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are inserted via the cephalic and basilic veins ¨ Central access required for infusions that are toxic to small veins due to medication p. H, osmolarity, and volume
Venous Sites for Access to the Superior Vena Cava
PICC Lines (peripherally inserted central catheter) ¨ PICC lines may be used in ambulatory settings or for long term therapy ¨ Used for delivery of medication as well as PN ¨ Inserted in the cephalic, basilic, median basilic, or median cephalic veins and threaded into the superior vena cava ¨ Can remain in place for up to 1 year with proper maintenance and without complications
PN: Peripheral Access PN may be administered via peripheral access when ¨ Therapy is expected to be short term (10 -14 days) ¨ Energy and protein needs are moderate ¨ Formulation osmolarity is <600 -900 m. Osm/L ¨ Fluid restriction is not necessary A. S. P. E. N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual, 2005; p. 94
Parenteral Nutrition Macronutrients & Micronutrients
Macronutrients: Carbohydrate ¨ Source: ¨ Properties: Monohydrous dextrose Nitrogen sparing Energy source 3. 4 Kcal/g Hyperosmolar ¨ Recommended intake: 2 – 5 mg/kg/min 50 -65% of total calories
Macronutrients: Carbohydrate Potential Adverse Effects: ¨ Increased minute ventilation ¨ Increased CO 2 production ¨ Increased RQ ¨ Increased O 2 consumption ¨ Lipogenesis and liver problems ¨ Hyperglycemia
Macronutrients: Amino Acids ¨ Source: Crystalline amino acids— standard or specialty ¨ Properties: 4. 0 Kcal/g EAA 40– 50% NEAA 5060% Glutamine / Cysteine ¨ Recommended intake: 0. 8 -2. 0 g/kg/day 15 -20% of total calories
Macronutrients: Amino Acids Potential Adverse Effects: ¨ Increased renal solute load ¨ Azotemia
Macronutrients: Amino Acids ¨ Specialized Amino Acid Solutions Branched chain amino acids (BCAA) Essential amino acids (EAA) ¨ Not shown to improve patient outcome ¨ More expensive than standard solutions
Macronutrients: Lipid ¨ Source: Safflower and/or soybean oil ¨ Properties: Long chain triglycerides Isotonic or hypotonic Stabilized emulsions 10 Kcals/g Prevents essential fatty acid deficiency ¨ Recommended intake: 0. 5 – 1. 5 g/kg/day (not >2 g/kg) 12 – 24 hour infusion rate
Macronutrients: Lipids Requirements ¨ 4% to 10% kcals given as lipid meets EFA requirements; or 2% to 4% kcals given as linoleic acid ¨ Generally 500 m. L of 10% fat emulsion given two times weekly or 500 m. L of 20% lipids given once weekly will prevent EFAD ¨ Usual range 25% to 35% of total kcals ¨ Max. 60% of kcal or 2 g fat/kg
Macronutrients: Lipids Potential Adverse Effects: ¨ Egg allergy ¨ Hypertriglyceridemia ¨ Decreased cell-mediated immunity (limit to <1 g/kg/day in critically ill immunosuppressed patients) ¨ Abnormal LFTs
Parenteral Base Solutions ¨ Carbohydrate – Available in concentrations from 5% to 70% – D 30, D 50 and D 70 used for manual mixing ¨ Amino acids – Available in 3, 3. 5, 5, 7, 8. 5, 10, 15, 20% solutions – 8. 5% and 10% generally used for manual mixing ¨ Fat – 10% emulsions = 1. 1 kcal/ml – 20% emulsions = 2 kcal/ml – 30% emulsions = 3 kcal/ml (used only in mixing TNA, not for direct venous delivery) The A. S. P. E. N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual, 2 nd edition, 2005, p. 97; Barber et al. In ASPEN, The Science and Practice of Nutrition Support: A Case-Based Core Curriculum. 2001.
Other Requirements ¨ Fluid— 30 to 50 ml/kg (1. 5 to 3 L/day) – Sterile water is added to PN admixture to meet fluid requirements ¨ Electrolytes – Use acetate or chloride forms to manage metabolic acidosis or alkalosis ¨ Vitamins: multivitamin formulations ¨ Trace elements
Electrolytes/Vitamins/Trace Elements ¨ Because parenterally-administered vitamins and trace elements do not go through digestion/absorption, recommendations are lower than DRIs ¨ Salt forms of electrolytes can affect acidbase balance
Adult Parenteral Multivitamins ¨ New FDA requirements published in 2000 replacing NAG-AMA guidelines ¨ Increased B 1, B 6, vitamin C, folic acid, added Vitamin K ¨ MVI Adult (Mayne Pharma) and Infuvite (MVI-13) from Baxter contain Vitamin K and are consistent with the new FDA guidelines ¨ MVI-12 (Mayne Pharma) does not contain Vitamin K
Parenteral Nutrition Vitamin Guidelines Vitamin FDA Guidelines* A IU 3300 IU B 2 mg 3. 6 D IU 200 IU B 1 mg 6 E IU 10 IU B 6 mg 6 K mcg 150 mcg B 12 mg 5. 0 C mg 200 Biotin mcg 60 Folate 600 B 5 dexpanthenol 15 mcg Niacin mg mg 40
Daily Trace Element Supplementation for Adult PN TRACE ELEMENT INTAKE Chromium 10 -15 mcg Copper 0. 3 -0. 5 mg Manganese 60 -100 mcg Zinc 2. 5 -5. 0 mg ASPEN: Safe practices for parenteral nutrition formulations. JPEN 22(2) 49, 1998
Daily Electrolyte Requirements Adult PN Electrolyte PN Equiv Standard Intake RDA Calcium 10 m. Eq 10 -15 m. Eq Magnesium 10 m. Eq 8 -20 m. Eq Phosphate 30 mmol 20 -40 mmol Sodium N/A 1 -2 m. Eq/kg + replacement Potassium N/A 1 -2 m. Eq/kg Acetate N/A As needed for acid-base Chloride N/A As needed for acid-base
PN Contaminants ¨ Components of PN formulations have been found to be contaminated with trace elements ¨ Most common contaminants are aluminum and manganese ¨ Aluminum toxicity a problem in pts with renal compromise on long-term PN and in infants and neonates ¨ Can cause osteopenia in long term adult PN patients ASPEN Nutrition Support Practice Manual 2005; p. 109
PN Contaminants ¨ FDA requires disclosure of aluminum content of PN components ¨ Safe intake of aluminum in PN is set at 5 mcg/kg/day
PN Contaminants ¨ Manganese toxicity has been reported in long term home PN patients ¨ May lead to neurological symptoms ¨ Manganese concentrations of 8 to 22 mcg/daily volume have been reported in formulations with no added manganese ¨ May need to switch to single-unit trace elements that don’t include manganese ASPEN Nutrition Support Practice Manual 2005; p. 9899
Calculating Nutrient Needs ¨ Provide adequate calories so protein is not used as an energy source ¨ Avoid excess kcal (>35 kcal/kg) ¨ Determine energy and protein needs using usual methods (kcals/kg, Ireton. Jones 1992, Harris-Benedict) ¨ Use specific PN dosing guides for electrolytes, vitamins, and minerals
Protein Requirements ¨ 1. 2 to 1. 5 g protein/kg IBW mild or moderate stress ¨ Up to 2. 5 g protein/kg IBW burns or severe trauma
Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition ¨ Hyperosmolar solutions cause thrombophlebitis in peripheral veins ¨ Limited to 800 to 900 m. Osm/kg (MHS uses 1150 m. Osm/kg w/ lipid in the solution) ¨ Dextrose limited to 5 -10% final concentration and amino acids 3% final concentration ¨ Electrolytes may also be limited ¨ Use lipid to protect veins and increase calories
Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition ¨ New catheters allow longer support via this method ¨ In adults, requires large fluid volumes to deliver adequate nutrition support (2. 5 -3 L) ¨ May be appropriate in mild to moderate malnutrition (<2000 kcal required or <14 days) ¨ More commonly used in infants and children ¨ Controversial
Contraindications to Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition ¨ Significant malnutrition ¨ Severe metabolic stress ¨ Large nutrition or electrolyte needs (potassium is a strong vascular irritant) ¨ Fluid restriction ¨ Need for prolonged PN (>2 weeks) ¨ Renal or liver compromise From Mirtallo. In ASPEN, The Science and Practice of Nutrition Support: A Case. Based Core Curriculum. 2001, 222.
Compounding Methods ¨ Total nutrient admixture (TNA) or 3 -in-1 – Dextrose, amino acids, lipid, additives are mixed together in one container – Lipid is provided as part of the PN mixture on a daily basis and becomes an important energy substrate ¨ 2 -in-1 solution of dextrose, amino acids, additives – Typically compounded in 1 -liter bags – Lipid is delivered as piggyback daily or intermittently as a source of EFA
Advantages of TNA ¨ Decreased nursing time ¨ Decreased risk of touch contamination ¨ Decreased pharmacy prep time ¨ Cost savings ¨ Easier administration in home PN ¨ Better fat utilization in slow, continuous infusion of fat ¨ Physiological balance of macronutrients
Disadvantages of TNA ¨ Diminished stability and compatibility ¨ IVFE (IV fat emulsions) limits the amount of nutrients that can be compounded ¨ Limited visual inspection of TNA; reduced ability to detect precipitates ASPEN Nutrition Support Practice Manual 2005; p. 98 -99
Two-in-One PN
PN Compounding Machines: Automix
PN Compounding Machines: Micromix
PN Solution a Components Central ---Solutions--- Dextrose Amino Acids Fat a% Final Concentration Peripheral Solutions Lipidbased Dextrosebased 14. 5% 35. 0% <10. 0% 5. 5% 5. 0% <4. 25% 250 ml/ 20% fat q M, Th 3. 0 - 8. 0% 5. 0% Courtesy of Marian, MJ.
Initiation of PN ¨ Adults should be hemodynamically stable, able to tolerate the fluid volume necessary to deliver significant support, and have central venous access ¨ If central access is not available, PPN should be considered (more commonly used in neonatal and peds population) ¨ Start slowly (1 L 1 st day; 2 L 2 nd day) ASPEN Nutrition Support Practice Manual 2005; p. 98 -99
Initiation of PN: formulation ¨ As protein associated with few metabolic side effects, maximum amount of protein can be given on the first day, up to 60 -70 grams/liter ¨ Maximum CHO given first day 150 -200 g/day or a 15 -20% final dextrose concentration ¨ In pts with glucose intolerance, 100 -150 g dextrose or 10 -15% glucose concentration may be given initially ASPEN Nutrition Support Practice Manual 2005; p. 98 -99
Initiation of PN: Formulation ¨ Generally energy and protein needs can be met in adults by day 2 or 3 ¨ In neonates and peds, time to reach full support relates inversely to age, may be 3 -5 days
Initiation of PN: Formulation ¨ Dextrose content of PN can be increased if capillary blood glucose levels are consistently <180 mg/d. L ¨ IVFE in PN can be increased if triglycerides are <400 mg/d. L ASPEN Nutrition Support Practice Manual 2005; p. 109
PN Administration: Transition to Enteral Feedings in Adults ¨ Controversial ¨ In adults receiving oral or enteral nutrition sufficient to maintain blood glucose, no need to taper PN ¨ Reduce rate by half every 1 to 2 hrs or switch to 10% dextrose IV) may prevent rebound hypoglycemia (not necessary in PPN) ¨ Monitor blood glucose levels 30 -60 minutes after cessation
PN Administration: Transition to Enteral Feedings in Pediatrics ¨ Generally tapered more slowly than in adults as oral or enteral feedings are introduced and advanced ¨ Generally PN is continued until 75 -80% of energy needs are met enterally ASPEN Nutrition Support Practice Manual 2005; p. 109
Medications That May Be Added to Total Nutrient Admixture (TNA) ¨ Phytonadione ¨ Metoclopromide ¨ Selenium ¨ Ranitidine ¨ Zinc chloride ¨ Sodium iodide ¨ Levocarnitine ¨ Heparin ¨ Insulin ¨ Octreotide
Parenteral Nutrition Infusion Schedules
Infusion Schedules ¨ Continuous PN Non-interrupted infusion of a PN solution over 24 hours via a central or peripheral venous access
Continuous PN Advantages ¨ Well tolerated by most patients ¨ Requires less manipulation – decreased nursing time – decreased potential for “touch” contamination
Continuous PN Disadvantages ¨ Persistent anabolic state – altered insulin : glucagon ratios – increased lipid storage by the liver ¨ Reduces mobility in ambulatory patients
Infusion Schedules ¨ Cyclic PN – The intermittent administration of PN via a central or peripheral venous access, usually over a period of 12 – 18 hours – Patients on continuous therapy may be converted to cyclic PN over 24 -48 hours
Cyclic PN ¨ Advantages – Approximates normal physiology of intermittent feeding – Maintains: • Nitrogen balance • Visceral proteins – Ideal for ambulatory patients • Allows normal activity • Improves quality of life
Cyclic PN ¨ Disadvantages – Incorporation of N 2 into muscle stores may be suboptimal • Nutrients administered when patient is less active – Not tolerated by critically ill patients – Requires more nursing manipulation • Increased potential for touch contamination • Increased nursing time
Parenteral Nutrition Home TPN
Home TPN ¨ Safety and efficacy depend on: – Proper selection of patients – Adequate discharge planning/education – Home monitoring protocols
Home TPN ¨ Patient selection – Reasonable life expectancy – Demonstrates motivation, competence, compliance – Home environment conducive to sterile technique
Home TPN: Discharge Planning ¨ Determination whether patient meets payer criteria for PN; completion of CMN forms ¨ Identification of home care provider and DME supplier ¨ Identification of monitoring team for home ¨ Conversion of 24 -hour infusion schedule to cyclic infusion with monitoring of patient response
Home TPN Cost effective – Quicker discharge from hospital – Improved rehabilitation in the home – Reduced hospital readmissions
Common Indications for PN in Peds ¨ Surgical GI disorders ¨ Intractable diarrhea of infancy ¨ Short bowel syndrome ¨ Inflammatory bowel disease ¨ Intractable chylothorax ¨ Intensive cancer treatment
Pediatric Energy Needs in PN ¨ No consensus exists as to how to determine energy needs of hospitalized children ¨ RDAs are intended for healthy children but can use for healthy/acutely ill children and monitor response ¨ Can estimate REE using WHO equation and add stress factors, monitor clinical course ¨ Indirect calorimetry recommended in difficult cases
RDAs for Energy and Protein Category Infants Children Females Males Age (yr) 0. 0 -0. 5 1 -3 4 -6 7 -10 11 -14 15 -18 Energy Protein (kcal/kg/d) (g/kg/d) 108 102 90 70 47 40 44 45 2. 2 1. 1 1. 0 0. 8 1. 0 0. 9 Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10 th ed. 1989. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
WHO Equations to predict REE from body weight Sex/Age Range (years) Males 0 -3 Males 3 -10 Males 10 -18 Females 0 -3 Females 3 -10 Females 10 -18 Equation to Derive REE (kcal/d) (60. 0 x wt) – 54 (22. 7 x wt) + 495 (17. 5 x wt) + 651 (6. 1 x wt) – 51 (22. 5 x wt) + 499 (12. 2 x wt) + 746
Increase WHO REE by stress factors Fever Cardiac Failure Increase 13% per degree C 15 -25% Traumatic Injury 20 -30% Severe respiratory distress or bronchopulmonary dysplasia Severe sepsis 25 -30% 45 -50 Olson, D. Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition. In Sharpening your skills as a nutrition support dietitian. DNS, 2003.
Trauma/Critically Ill Peds Age in years Kcals/kg G/pro/kg 0 -1 90 -120 2. 0 -3. 5 1 -6 75 -90 1. 8 -3. 0 7 -12 50 -75 1. 5 -2. 5 13 -18 30 -60 1. 0 -2. 0
Pediatric PN: Fluids ¨ Standard calculation: – 100 kcal/kg for infant 3 -10 kg – 1000 kcal + 50 kcal/kg for every kg over 10 kg for a child 10 -20 kg – 1500 kcal + 20 kcal/kg for every kg over 20 kg for a child over 20 kg – 1 m. L fluid/kcal/d + adjustments for fever, diarrhea, stress, etc. ASPEN BOD Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN 26; 26 SA, 2001
Pediatric PN: Carbohydrate ¨ Carbohydrate should comprise 45 -50% of caloric intake in infants and children (C) ¨ For neonates, CHO delivery in PN should begin at 6 -8 mg/kg/minute of dextrose and advanced to 10 -14 mg/kg/minute. (B) ASPEN BOD Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN 26; 28 -29 SA, 2001
Pediatric PN: Lipid ¨ Preterm: start at. 5 g/kg/day and increase by. 5 g/kg q day ¨ Infants: Start at 1 g/kg and increase by. 5 g/kg/day until the maximum or desired dose is reached; need 0. 5 to 1 g/kg/day for EFA needs ¨ Maximum is 3 g/kg for <24 months old and 2. 5 g/kg for 24 months and older
Daily Electrolyte and Mineral Requirements for Peds Pts Electrolyte Infants/Children Adolescents Sodium 2 -6 m. Eq/kg Individualized Chloride 2 -5 m. Eq/kg Individualized Potassium 2 -3 m. Eq/kg Individualized Calcium 1 -2. 5 m. Eq/kg 10 -20 m. Eq Phosphorus 0. 5 -1 mmol/kg 10 -40 mmol Magnesium 0. 3 -0. 5 m. Eq/kg 10 -30 m. Eq National Advisory Group. Safe practices for parenteral nutrition formulations JPEN 1998; 22: 49 -66
Document in Chart ¨ Type of feeding formula and tube ¨ Method (bolus, drip, pump) ¨ Rate and water flush ¨ Intake energy and protein ¨ Tolerance, complications, and corrective actions ¨ Patient education
- Parenteral nutrition calculations
- Tpn cycling
- Complication of parenteral nutrition
- Ppn vs tpn
- Rxkinetics osmolarity
- Tpn complication
- Total parenteral nutrition cost
- Small bowel obstruction medical nutrition therapy
- Rxkinetics
- Rxkinetics
- Tpn 1
- Rxkinetics
- Graphic weight meaning
- Ghost graphic story graphic and wayfinding
- The source of valid nutrition information is
- What is graphic sources
- Http //mbs.meb.gov.tr/ http //www.alantercihleri.com
- Http //siat.ung.ac.id atau http //pmb.ung.ac.id
- Image source:http://graphicdesign.spokanefalls.edu
- Http data source exception
- Parenteral dosage calculations
- Sonda nasogastrica rx
- Dieta enteral e parenteral
- Jurnal sediaan parenteral volume kecil
- Intra arterial route advantages and disadvantages
- Macam macam pemberian obat secara parenteral
- Clarity test for parenterals
- Parenteral beslenme komplikasyonları
- Parenteral route definition
- Parenteral emulsion
- Diselectrolitemia
- Hidratación parenteral
- Admixture iv
- Formula enteral rumah sakit
- Enteral beslenme
- "google forms"
- Tipos de nutrición parenteral
- Bolus plural
- Apendicitis
- Non parenteral route of drug administration
- Large volume parenterals means
- Pengertian parenteral
- Aminovel
- Parenteral calculations
- Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (opat)
- Postpilorik
- Tpn osmolarity
- Npt npp
- Via intraperitoneal ventajas y desventajas
- Local route of drug administration
- Hypodermic needle
- Penicilina sodica cristalina
- Aislamiento parenteral
- Enteral parenteral beslenme
- Topiocal
- Monophasic dosage form example
- Specialized nutrition support
- Pharmacological and parenteral therapies
- Gcse food tech high skill dishes
- Nutrition care process
- Tanzania national nutrition survey 2020
- Tanzania national nutrition survey 2018
- Biobeyond unit 8 nutrition lab counting calories
- Conceptual framework of malnutrition
- Understanding nutrition 13th edition rental
- Swine nutrition management
- Nutrition411
- Monaco nutrition facts sugar
- Community nutrition assessment
- Benefits of astaxanthin
- San lee middle school
- Mr nutrition el palo
- Nutrition tools standards and guidelines
- What is nutrition survey
- Nutrition words
- Nutrition monitoring definition
- Nutrition metabolism and body temperature regulation
- Objectives of photosynthesis
- Socio-ecological model of nutrition & health