Palestine Polytechnic University Center for Excellence in Teaching

Palestine Polytechnic University Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning University Ranking System Adnan Shehadeh & Hasan Sawalha 25/09/2018

Introduction • Main reasons is competition: q recruit students q. Secure research funding q. Enhance prestige

Main International Ranking 1. The World University Ranking by Times Higher Education (THE) 2. The QS World University Ranking by Quacquarelli Symonds Ltd (QS) 3. The Academic Ranking of World Universities by Shanghai Jiao Tong University (ARWU) 4. U-Multirank, by Consortium of 4 universities centers funded by EU led by Center for Higher Education in Germany (CHE)

International Rankings: dimensions, indicators and weights

Examples of domestic rankings, dimensions of excellence, indicators and weights

Jordanian University Ranking System • 1. Teaching & Learning 250 points • 2. Scientific Research 250 points • 3. Internationalization 150 points • 4. Quality of graduates 200 points • 5. Academic accreditation 150 points It includes 29 performance indicators.

Positive vs. Negative Positive 1. Provide information to potential students. 2. Provide information to policymakers and stakeholders. 3. Provide benchmark information for universities. 4. Stimulate improvement as a result of benchmarks and incentives.

Negatives 1. The impact of rankings: the effect on the decisions of governments and universities. (France, Germany, Russia, China) 2. The data : if the data is not strong and correct, the ranking will be the same. 3. The way rankings are presented- from best to worst. 4. Choice of appropriate weight. ( mainly Research)

Problematic issues (Research dominant) 1. They measure mainly research performance. (surveys of reputation, employers) 2. Academic staff to student ratio as an indicator of teaching quality. (reflects research issues) 3. Commercial in come largely because of research. 4. International staff is a almost about research( recruiting researchers) 5. The proportion of Ph. D students is also research related. 6. The number of Nobel Prize winners-Research account for 85% of THE and QS and 100% of ARWU. • This drives universities to focus on research on the expenses of teaching. This is appropriate for small number of universities.

Data issue • Terminology and definitions: 1. Apart from publications and citations, The only source for information is university. 2. No clear definitions of the terms, students, full-time staff, graduate. 3. No auditing of the provided data. (Ttrinity College Dublin, Sultan Qaboos University) 4. In reputation surveys (represent 50%-30% weight), the response is less that 10%.

Conclusions • The research shows that: 1. Ranking is almost entirely based on researchrelated criteria. 2. If universities want to move up, they must focus on research on the expenses of teaching and other activities. 3. The used data is of doubtful quality. 4. It urges the governments and universities to ‘ignore rankings when making decisions and to do what they do because it is right, not because it will impact performance in rankings’

Reference • Bekhradnia, B. 2016. International University Ranking: For Good or Ill? . Higher Education Policy Institute. Oxford.