P 16121 SAE Aero Aircraft Design Build Agenda
P 16121: SAE Aero Aircraft Design & Build
Agenda Team Introduction Competition Background Current Situation Project Goals Stakeholders Use Scenario Customer Needs Engineering Requirements Constraints Project Plan Risk Analysis Questions
Team Introductions Christopher Jones - Aeronautical Engineer Matthew Zielinski - Aeronautical Engineer Ronald Manning - Aeronautical Engineer Dominic Myren: Aeronautical Engineer – Project Manager Marc Protacio : Aeronautical Engineer – Team Leader
SAE Aerospace Competition Background An event that challenges engineering students in the United States and internationally through the design, build, and test of an aircraft Three Classes: ◦ Regular – The standard class we are interested in ◦ Advanced – Extra challenge for experienced teams ◦ Micro – A new class focusing on small scale craft The goal is to build an aircraft to carry a greater weight than others while following a set of restrictions and generating accurate engineering documentation
Current State RIT Aero Design Club has been absent from the competition since 2008 ◦ Prior to 2008, RIT had been inconsistent in participating in the competition annually Lacking… ◦ Experienced veterans to lead/guide the club ◦ Aeronautical engineering experience/knowledge ◦ Full commitment as students are on co-op for parts of the year ◦ Funding
Desired State/Deliverables ◦ A functional finished aircraft designed and built to SAE Aero standards ◦ Comprehensive documentation of design, build, and testing methods and processes Jumpstart the Aero Club ◦ Build competence through sharing experience from the present Senior Design project ◦ Desired State: Aero Design club is able to compete in the SAE Aero Competition annually and be competitive
Stakeholders SAE Aero Organization – Primary Customer RIT Aero Design Club MSD I Team Members Dr. Kolodziej – Faculty Guide RIT Aerospace Engineering Faculty Potential Sponsors Rochester Institute of Technology
Use Scenario Fly aircraft according to SAE Aero Regular Class Competition mission requirements
Customer Requirements Importance Key: 3=must have, 2=nice to have, 1=preference only
Engineering Requirements Importance Key: 9 = Critical 3 = Moderate 1 = Insignificant *Note: All engineering requirements are deemed critical as failing to meet the target values will result in penalization or disqualification.
House of Quality
Constraints
Project Plan
Risk Analysis
Questions? Comments Concerns Complaints
- Slides: 15