P 16121 SAE Aero Aircraft Design Build Agenda

P 16121: SAE Aero Aircraft Design & Build

Agenda Team Introduction Competition Background Current Situation Project Goals Stakeholders Use Scenario Customer Needs Engineering Requirements Constraints Project Plan Risk Analysis Questions

Team Introductions Christopher Jones - Aeronautical Engineer Matthew Zielinski - Aeronautical Engineer Ronald Manning - Aeronautical Engineer Dominic Myren: Aeronautical Engineer – Project Manager Marc Protacio : Aeronautical Engineer – Team Leader

SAE Aerospace Competition Background An event that challenges engineering students in the United States and internationally through the design, build, and test of an aircraft Three Classes: ◦ Regular – The standard class we are interested in ◦ Advanced – Extra challenge for experienced teams ◦ Micro – A new class focusing on small scale craft The goal is to build an aircraft to carry a greater weight than others while following a set of restrictions and generating accurate engineering documentation

Current State RIT Aero Design Club has been absent from the competition since 2008 ◦ Prior to 2008, RIT had been inconsistent in participating in the competition annually Lacking… ◦ Experienced veterans to lead/guide the club ◦ Aeronautical engineering experience/knowledge ◦ Full commitment as students are on co-op for parts of the year ◦ Funding

Desired State/Deliverables ◦ A functional finished aircraft designed and built to SAE Aero standards ◦ Comprehensive documentation of design, build, and testing methods and processes Jumpstart the Aero Club ◦ Build competence through sharing experience from the present Senior Design project ◦ Desired State: Aero Design club is able to compete in the SAE Aero Competition annually and be competitive

Stakeholders SAE Aero Organization – Primary Customer RIT Aero Design Club MSD I Team Members Dr. Kolodziej – Faculty Guide RIT Aerospace Engineering Faculty Potential Sponsors Rochester Institute of Technology

Use Scenario Fly aircraft according to SAE Aero Regular Class Competition mission requirements

Customer Requirements Importance Key: 3=must have, 2=nice to have, 1=preference only

Engineering Requirements Importance Key: 9 = Critical 3 = Moderate 1 = Insignificant *Note: All engineering requirements derived from SAE Aero rules are deemed critical as failing to meet the target values will result in penalization or disqualification.

House of Quality

Constraints

Project Plan

Risk Analysis

Questions? Comments Concerns Complaints