Overview of the EU regulatory system and governance

  • Slides: 20
Download presentation
Overview of the EU regulatory system and governance PANDRH Conference – 5 September 2013

Overview of the EU regulatory system and governance PANDRH Conference – 5 September 2013 Ottawa Presented by: Alexios Skarlatos European Medicines Agency – Head of Product Information Quality An agency of the European Union

CONTENTS 1. Approval of medicines in the EU 2. EU assessment collaboration: Organisational aspects

CONTENTS 1. Approval of medicines in the EU 2. EU assessment collaboration: Organisational aspects 3. EU assessment collaboration: Enablers and facilitators 2

1. Approval of medicines in EU 3

1. Approval of medicines in EU 3

A medicinal product may only be placed on the market in the EU, when

A medicinal product may only be placed on the market in the EU, when a marketing authorisation has been issued

EU cooperation in MA assessment: evolution • 1970 s-80 s: First EU initiatives to

EU cooperation in MA assessment: evolution • 1970 s-80 s: First EU initiatives to encourage communication, cooperation and recognition of assessments between Member States ‘Multi-State’ and ‘Concertation Procedures’ Final national Member State decision • 1990 s: Creation of the European Medicines Agency (1995) Introduction of the ‘Centralised Procedure’ (1995) and the ‘Mutual Recognition Procedure (1993; mandatory from 1998) • 2000 s: Revision of Pharma legislation (required after 6 y experience) Adapt and prepare for enlargement of EU Introduction of the ‘Decentralised Procedure’ 5

Drivers of Harmonisation • The global pharmaceutical market -> effective operation of the internal

Drivers of Harmonisation • The global pharmaceutical market -> effective operation of the internal market • Pharmaceutical industry -> facilitate the free movement of medicines • Scientific culture • Patient involvement • Need for worksharing -> avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts • Fear of the unknown - insecurity 6

Obstacles to harmonisation • Giving up sovereignty • Need for compromising • Heterogeneous cultures

Obstacles to harmonisation • Giving up sovereignty • Need for compromising • Heterogeneous cultures • Language issue • Uneven levels of capacity/experience • Uneven share of the workload 7

Current Marketing Authorisation procedures in EU Approval in 1 MS => National Authorisation procedure

Current Marketing Authorisation procedures in EU Approval in 1 MS => National Authorisation procedure Approval in n or all MSs => EU Authorisation procedure 3 EU procedures: Centralised Procedure (CP) 1 single EU MA Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Decentralised Procedure (DCP) n national MAs Route? Choice? Depending on type of product and authorisation history in EU + Regulatory & marketing strategy Company preferences etc … 8

Eligibility to the Centralised Procedure “Mandatory Scope” - Biotech products - New Active Substances

Eligibility to the Centralised Procedure “Mandatory Scope” - Biotech products - New Active Substances for Cancer, Diabetes, AIDS, Neurodegenerative, viral and auto-immune diseases - Orphan medicinal products - Cell & gene therapy + tissue engineered products “Optional Scope” - Other new active substances - Innovative uses of ‘old’ substances - Interest of patients at EU level - Generics of centrally-authorised products 9

2. EU assessment collaboration: Organisational aspects 10

2. EU assessment collaboration: Organisational aspects 10

EMA and the European Regulatory Network Committees EMEA Secretariat Working Parties National Competent Authorities

EMA and the European Regulatory Network Committees EMEA Secretariat Working Parties National Competent Authorities (NCAs) 11

Resources in the Centralised Procedure • National Competent Authorities (NCAs) in 28 EU Member

Resources in the Centralised Procedure • National Competent Authorities (NCAs) in 28 EU Member States. EMA not intended to replace NCAs, but to be a trusted partner in the EU Regulatory Network • > 3500 scientific experts nominated by Member States Available for scientific work & assessments for EMA • Scientific committee (CHMP) delivers a final opinion • Multidisciplinary assessment teams in MS to perform assessment (as Rapporteur/Co-Rapporteur) or participate as ‘peer reviewer’ • Services are provided to EMA on the basis of a cooperation agreement • All agencies linked by secure IT network (Eudra. Net) • Fees received by EMA payment of (Co-)Rapporteur 12

CHMP: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use Chair and Vice Chair + 1

CHMP: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use Chair and Vice Chair + 1 member + 1 alternate/MS + max. 5 co-opted members + Tomas Salmonson Chair CHMP accompanied by experts Ian Hudson Vice-Chair CHMP + 5 co-opted members 13 13

Support for MRP & DCP: Coordination group • Coordination Group for Mutual Recognition and

Support for MRP & DCP: Coordination group • Coordination Group for Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures – human (CMDh) • Initially, voluntary ‘Mutual Recognition Facilitation Group’ • Recognised and legal mandate in EU legislation revision • Representatives of all Member States • Agree on common rules procedural / regulatory matters Guidance to applicants • Discuss and solve scientific issues during MRP/DCP • EMA: secretariat, organisation of monthly meetings at EMA 14

3. EU assessment collaboration: enablers & facilitators 15

3. EU assessment collaboration: enablers & facilitators 15

 • Harmonised legal requirements (high level) for Marketing Authorisation Application • Harmonisation of

• Harmonised legal requirements (high level) for Marketing Authorisation Application • Harmonisation of technical standards and requirements ICH guidelines, incl. e. CTD CHMP scientific guidelines - applicable to CP, MRP, DCP • Provision of regulatory guidance Agreement on common approaches & procedures Commission guidelines CHMP and EMA guidance documents, Q&As, SOPs Advice to applicants Consistent approach/interpretation between Member States 16

 • Working together in expert Working Parties or ad-hoc groups e. g. Quality

• Working together in expert Working Parties or ad-hoc groups e. g. Quality Working Party GCP inspectors working group • Training of assessors • Common templates for assessment reports • ‘Twinning’ projects, e. g. for new EU Member States • Years of confidence building, working together, worksharing • Oversight and management by ‘Heads of Medicines Agencies’ (HMA) Group • Secure communication tools and databases 17

Member State cooperation in MRP and DCP • «Coordination Group for Mutual Recognition and

Member State cooperation in MRP and DCP • «Coordination Group for Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures» CMDh, since Nov 2005 Replaces the informal MRFG group Coordination and facilitation of the operation of MRP and DCP Discussions on procedural/regulatory issues, guidance docs + scientific discussions on applications where MSs disagree Ensure consistency of standards and good decision-making Avoid referrals to EMA 18

 • Disagreements in MRP and DCP: only on the basis of ‘potential serious

• Disagreements in MRP and DCP: only on the basis of ‘potential serious risk to public health’ Commission Guideline: definition and examples CMDh: ensure common understanding and application • Harmonisation of national Sm. PCs of originators, in order to facilitate approval of generics accross EU • Commission guidelines on MRP and DCP procedures + CMDh publication of ‘Best Practice Guides’ Procedural guidance documents Q&A • Worksharing and working group initiatives, coordinated by CMDh e. g. on PSURs and Active Substance Master Files 19

Thank you Alexios M. Skarlatos Head of Product Information Quality + 44 207 418

Thank you Alexios M. Skarlatos Head of Product Information Quality + 44 207 418 8682 alexios. skarlatos@ema. europa. eu 20