Overview of Pros Cons for Low Temp test

Overview of Pros & Cons for Low Temp test procedure development options Options Pros Option 1: Stand-alone new ü No x-references needed ‘GTR Low Temp’ ü Stand alone document – everything in one place (i. e. Full GTR 15 text ü … modified for Low Temp Test) WLTP-27 -02 eappendix 2 Cons × Similar document size to GTR#15 (Amendment 5 is 376 pages long) × Future Amendments to common Type 1/6 text would have to be made in 2 documents (not just 1) × Process involved to introduce new GTR Option 2: New ‘GTR Low Temp’ which relies on xrefs to GTR 15 to avoid duplication of common elements ü Easier drafting with focus on × Not common practice for a GTR to x-ref differences/deviations from Type 1 test to another GTR in GTR 15 × GTR would be hard to use in practice – ü Reduced administrative upkeep than constant switching from one GTR to having two ‘full’ GTRs another × Process involved to introduce new GTR Option 3: Optional new annex to GTR#15 which relies on x-refs to other parts of GTR 15 to avoid duplication of common elements ü Easier drafting with focus on × Makes GTR 15 even larger differences/deviations from Type 1 test × Could having ‘optional annexes’ have ü Concept already used in UNR 83 unintended consequences for CPs not ü Smoother transposition into UNR WLTP requiring the test within those annexes? (in phase 3) × … ü Less initial admin. because no new GTR ü Reduced administrative upkeep