Our next phase of regulation A more targeted

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Our next phase of regulation: A more targeted, responsive and collaborative approach 11

Our next phase of regulation: A more targeted, responsive and collaborative approach 11

Our purpose The Care Quality Commission is the independent regulator of health and adult

Our purpose The Care Quality Commission is the independent regulator of health and adult social care in England. We make sure health and social care services provide people with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care and we encourage care services to improve. 2

Our current model of regulation Register We register those who apply to CQC to

Our current model of regulation Register We register those who apply to CQC to provide health and adult social care services Monitor, inspect and rate We monitor services, carry out expert inspections, and judge each service, usually to give an overall rating, and conduct thematic reviews Enforce Where we find poor care, we ask providers to improve and can enforce this if necessary Independent voice We provide an independent voice on the state of health and adult social care in England on issues that matter to the public, providers and stakeholders 3

Key findings CQC’s first inspection programme of all GP practices in England provides an

Key findings CQC’s first inspection programme of all GP practices in England provides an unprecedented view of general practice… We found the best care where it is clearly evidenced that a practice has: • strong leadership, management and governance, • an understanding of everyone’s responsibilities in the practice team (skills mix), • a clear knowledge of the needs of patient groups and • a supportive local health economy. 4

Interim findings 100 5, 538 (85%) 50 114 (2%) 577 (9%) 89% of GP

Interim findings 100 5, 538 (85%) 50 114 (2%) 577 (9%) 89% of GP practices we have inspected are providing a good or outstanding standard of care 274 (4%) 0 Inadequate Source: CQC – 1 March 2017 Requires improvement Good Outstanding 5

Overall picture of quality in general practice Safe 3 Effective 2 Caring <0. 53

Overall picture of quality in general practice Safe 3 Effective 2 Caring <0. 53 Responsive Well-led 1 17 7 88 0% Source: CQC – 1 March 2017 3 93 4 3 1 79 3 89 8 6 85 20% 4 60% 80% 100% 6

Consultations on our proposed changes to inspections g Closed 20 December 2016 – 14

Consultations on our proposed changes to inspections g Closed 20 December 2016 – 14 February 2017 New care models and complex providers Cross sector changes to assessment frameworks Updated guidance for registration of learning disability services Changes to Hospitals inspection methodology u Closed 8. Aorg. uk/ www. cqc e nextphas 12 June – 8 August 2017 Changes to Adult Social Care regulation Changes to Primary Medical Services regulation Clarifying how we define registered providers and improving the structure of registration Updating guidance on Fit and Proper Person Requirements A joint consultation on Use of Resources with NHS Improvement is expected in Winter 2017 Changes to Independent Acute inspection methodology

The purpose of the consultations How we propose to update our approach and our

The purpose of the consultations How we propose to update our approach and our assessment framework to reflect the changing provider landscape more integrated approach that enables us to be flexible and responsive to changes in care provision more targeted approach that focuses on areas of greatest concern, and where there have been improvements in quality greater emphasis on leadership, including at the level of overall accountability for quality of care closer working and alignment with NHS Improvement and other partners so that providers experience less duplication Three consultations on these changes: Winter 2016/17, Summer 2017 and Autumn 2017.

Timing 20 October: Publish response to consultation, new guidance and methodology, 1 November: Introduction

Timing 20 October: Publish response to consultation, new guidance and methodology, 1 November: Introduction of the new assessment framework, with aligned Key Lines of Enquiry 2018: Introduce new system of provider information collections and annual regulatory reviews. 9

Testing our methodology As part of our consultation around how we regulate primary medical

Testing our methodology As part of our consultation around how we regulate primary medical services, we are also testing and piloting changes with GPs and urgent care providers • Four inspection teams – one in each region • Testing will be alongside our current methodology and with the permission of the provider • Will not affect rating • Opportunity for co-production SUBJECT TO 10

Key changes - register Registration Improvement Programme includes: • improving existing processes – including

Key changes - register Registration Improvement Programme includes: • improving existing processes – including a simpler process for low risk registration changes such as change of partners • ensuring we stay up to date with emerging models of care. Asking the right questions at registration • ensuring we are able to register new models at the guiding mind level SUBJECT TO 11

Key changes - monitor • Strengthened relationship management – more regular contact with providers

Key changes - monitor • Strengthened relationship management – more regular contact with providers and closer working with our national, regional, and local partners • CQC Insight – more timely information about a provider’s performance • Annual provider information collection – what has changed about quality of care provided over the last year • Regulatory planning review – annual review of information we hold on a provider; confirming inspection schedule where no change in quality indicated SUBJECT TO 12

Key changes - inspection Subject to consultation – we have proposed changes to the

Key changes - inspection Subject to consultation – we have proposed changes to the frequency of inspection. Under the proposals: • Practices rated Inadequate would be re-inspected after six months; • Requires Improvement within 12 months; • Good or Outstanding would move to an inspection interval of up to five years, although every year we will inspect a proportion. 13

Key changes – inspect • Scope – comprehensive inspections for providers rated Inadequate or

Key changes – inspect • Scope – comprehensive inspections for providers rated Inadequate or those not inspected before. For providers rated Good and Outstanding there will be a range of regulatory responses to ensure comprehensive assessment of practices – focus of these influenced by Insight • Inspection team – continue to use specialist advisors in the inspection process. We will use experts by experience more efficiently, for example by gathering evidence using telephone calls pre-inspection rather than on the site visit • Notice periods – increased flexibility including short notice and unannounced • Emphasis – more on the quality of care provided including population groups and conditions; less on policies and risk assessments SUBJECT TO 14

Provider information collection For Good and Outstanding providers the PIC will underpin our monitoring

Provider information collection For Good and Outstanding providers the PIC will underpin our monitoring of changes in the quality of care (both positive and negative): • An annual online information collection to replace the existing provider information return • We will ask providers for information every year, rather than as part of inspection preparation, and encourage them to keep it up to date • PIC will give practices an opportunity to champion the quality of care they are providing SUBJECT TO 15

Key changes – rate and report • Content – significantly shorter summary report supported

Key changes – rate and report • Content – significantly shorter summary report supported by an evidence table • Publishing reports – commitment to publishing 90% within 50 days of the inspection • Updating ratings – only changed on the basis of evidence from inspections (not as a result of regulatory planning review); six month limit for aggregating ratings dropped • Population groups – we are proposing rating population groups for only Effective and Responsive domains. This is to make rating and aggregation simpler and to better reflect where people are providing good care for particular groups in the ratings. SUBJECT TO 16

In summary: § § § § Less frequent inspection for most Closer working relationship

In summary: § § § § Less frequent inspection for most Closer working relationship with named lead at CQC Reduced burden re data collection More proportionate action - not only inspection Focus on outcomes A simpler process for low risk registration changes More timely information about a provider’s performance SUBJECT TO 17

The phased approach Current schedule of inspections will continue, based on: • Practices rated

The phased approach Current schedule of inspections will continue, based on: • Practices rated Requires Improvement or Inadequate • Good and Outstanding practices who were inspected early • Information of concern 1 November: • Introduction of the new assessment framework, • Aligned Key Lines of Enquiry, • Increased focus on monitoring and local relationships April 2018 • New system of Provider Information Collections • Annual regulatory reviews • Shorter report • New inspection frequencies 18