Other LAN Technologies LAN Standards u 802 Working

  • Slides: 26
Download presentation
Other LAN Technologies

Other LAN Technologies

LAN Standards u 802 Working Groups – 802. 3 Ethernet LANs – 802. 5

LAN Standards u 802 Working Groups – 802. 3 Ethernet LANs – 802. 5 Token-Ring Networks – 802. 11 Radio LANs – 802. 12 100 VG-Any. LAN 2

802. 5 Token-Ring Network Standard u Championed by IBM – Official IEEE and OSI

802. 5 Token-Ring Network Standard u Championed by IBM – Official IEEE and OSI standard, but most vendors follow IBM extensions to the standard u More reliable than 802. 3 Ethernet LANs u More complex and therefore more expensive u Lower market share than Ethernet LANs – Mostly in firms with large IBM mainframe networks – Tightly integrated into SNA u Read a tutorial in token-ring networks 3

Ring Topology in Token-Ring Networks Station B only receives frames from Station A and

Ring Topology in Token-Ring Networks Station B only receives frames from Station A and only transmits frames to Station C Station A Station B Frame Station C Ring Frame Station E Station D 4

Problem with Rings u If the ring breaks, LAN stops – Signals must go

Problem with Rings u If the ring breaks, LAN stops – Signals must go all the way around the ring, back to the sender – This becomes impossible 5

Use a Double Ring u One is unused in normal operation u If there

Use a Double Ring u One is unused in normal operation u If there is a break, the ring is wrapped – Still a ring Normal Wrapped 6

UTP and STP Wiring Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) Shielded Twisted Pair (STP) Twisted Pair

UTP and STP Wiring Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) Shielded Twisted Pair (STP) Twisted Pair Plastic Cover (Non-Shielding) Twisted Pair Outer Shield Around Bundle Twisted Pair Shielding Around Pair 7

STP vs. UTP u STP – Little interference – Thick: difficult to install –

STP vs. UTP u STP – Little interference – Thick: difficult to install – Expensive u UTP – – Thin: easy to install Inexpensive Interference is rarely a practical problem Does the job at a reasonable price, so dominates 8

Access Units in a Ring Access Unit STP link between Access Units Access Unit

Access Units in a Ring Access Unit STP link between Access Units Access Unit Stations Access Unit STP link from Station to Access Unit UTP Link from Station to Access Unit Station 9

Within the Access Unit u The ring is retained u Powered-up NICs added automatically

Within the Access Unit u The ring is retained u Powered-up NICs added automatically u Powered-off NICs bypassed automatically Bypassed Node Ring NIC Missing NIC 10

Token Passing in 802. 5 Token-Ring Networks Station B may only transmit when it

Token Passing in 802. 5 Token-Ring Networks Station B may only transmit when it receives a special frame called a token. Station B Token 11

Ethernet (802. 3) vs Token-Ring (802. 5) u Physical Layer – Ethernet primarily uses

Ethernet (802. 3) vs Token-Ring (802. 5) u Physical Layer – Ethernet primarily uses UTP wiring – Token-Ring Networks primarily use shielded twisted pair (STP) wiring u Topology (Layout) of the Wiring – Ethernet always uses bus (broadcast) topology – Token-Ring always uses a ring topology (connectivity) u Access Control – (Control of When Stations May Transmit) – Ethernet always uses CSMA/CD – Token-Ring always uses token passing 12

Ethernet (802. 3) vs Token-Ring (802. 5) 13 u Speed – Ethernet primarily 10

Ethernet (802. 3) vs Token-Ring (802. 5) 13 u Speed – Ethernet primarily 10 Mbps (moving to 100 Mbps and gigabit speeds) – Token-Ring Networks usually at 16 Mbps – TRNs can get closer to full capacity because token passing is more efficient than CSMA/CD at high traffic loads – Priority levels for real-time traffic (video teleconferencing, etc. ) u Cost – TRN is more complex, so NICs cost much more – TRN has low market share; low vendor competition adds to high NIC costs – Most firms do not find the benefits of TRNs to outweigh the costs

Shared Media LANs u Ethernet (802. 3) and Token-Ring Networks (802. 5) are Shared

Shared Media LANs u Ethernet (802. 3) and Token-Ring Networks (802. 5) are Shared Media LANs – Only one station may transmit at any moment. – Every station hears every transmission – Stations must wait their turn to transmit 14

Congestion and Latency in Shared Media LANs Station A Must Wait to Transmit Station

Congestion and Latency in Shared Media LANs Station A Must Wait to Transmit Station B is Transmitting But Must Stop Soon Shared Media LAN Transmission Station C Must Wait to Transmit 15

Congestion and Latency u As the number of stations on a shared media LAN

Congestion and Latency u As the number of stations on a shared media LAN increases. . . – Traffic increases, so – Stations must wait longer to transmit – Latency (delay) increases – This is called congestion u At 200 -300 stations, a 10 Mbps (4 -16 Mbps) shared media LAN becomes saturated 16

100 Mbps LANs u Reducing Congestion – One way to decrease congestion is to

100 Mbps LANs u Reducing Congestion – One way to decrease congestion is to increase LAN speed from 10 Mbps to 100 Mbps or higher – Each transmission will be briefer, because it can be transmitted faster – Therefore more stations can share the LAN before saturation occurs – Only postpones the problem 17

FDDI Network FDDI Ring 18

FDDI Network FDDI Ring 18

FDDI u FDDI – Fiber distributed data interface – Token-ring technology (but incompatible with

FDDI u FDDI – Fiber distributed data interface – Token-ring technology (but incompatible with 802. 5) – 100 Mbps – Mature (1987) – 200 km maximum diameter: popular for connecting LANs to local internets, not to connect desktops. – Priority levels for real-time traffic (voice, video) – Expensive NICs and other equipment – Read a tutorial in FDDI 19

100 Base-TX u Many install 100 Base-TX instead of 10 Base-T Today u Requires

100 Base-TX u Many install 100 Base-TX instead of 10 Base-T Today u Requires 100 Mbps hubs instead of 10 Mbps u Requires 100 Mbps NICs instead of 10 Mbps – Some hubs can also serve 10 Base-T NICs, so not all stations have to be upgraded at once u Uses easy Category 5 wiring, making upgrading 20

Upgrading from 10 Base-T to 100 Base-T u Need New Hub – All 100

Upgrading from 10 Base-T to 100 Base-T u Need New Hub – All 100 Base-TX is expensive – Often many 10 Base-T hubs for client PCs – A few 100 Base-TX hubs for servers u Need New NICs – Only in stations with 100 Base-T NICs u Retain Old Wiring – If Cat 5 – Avoids a major expense 21

22 Ethernet 100 Base-TX Network 100 Base-TX Hub ~50 maximum 100 m Segment Maximum

22 Ethernet 100 Base-TX Network 100 Base-TX Hub ~50 maximum 100 m Segment Maximum - 5 UTP wiring - NICs are replaced Station A Station B Station C

Ethernet 100 Base-TX Network 23 u The most popular 100 Base-X standard, runs over

Ethernet 100 Base-TX Network 23 u The most popular 100 Base-X standard, runs over existing 5 UTP wire of 10 Base-T u Only two segments, length ~200 m u Can mix 10 Base-T and 100 Base-T stations/NICs with hubs that take both types u Use the same 802. 3 MAC standard of 10 Base-T u Market has chosen Ethernet 100 Base-TX for desktop connection over FDDI u Read classic tutorial on Fast Ethernet

1000 Base-X (Gigabit Ethernet) u 1000 Mbps u Usually used to link 100 Base-X

1000 Base-X (Gigabit Ethernet) u 1000 Mbps u Usually used to link 100 Base-X hubs 1000 Base-X Hub 100 Base-T Hubs 24

1000 Base-X u Family of Standards (802. 3 z) u 1000 Base-LX – Long-wave

1000 Base-X u Family of Standards (802. 3 z) u 1000 Base-LX – Long-wave (lower frequency) laser – 550 meters on multimode optical fiber – 3 km on single mode fiber u 1000 Base-SX – Short-wave ( higher frequency) laser – 300 meters on 62. 5 micron multimode fiber 25

26 Full Duplex Ethernet u CSMA/CD is half duplex – Only one station may

26 Full Duplex Ethernet u CSMA/CD is half duplex – Only one station may transmit at a time – Others must wait – Because transmission system is shared u If station or hub connects directly to a hub, – The access line is not shared – Some 100 Base-X and 1000 Base-X hubs and NICs support full duplex operation – Disable CSMA/CD – 802. 3 x standard