Orthotic Devices Orthotic Devices Definition An orthosis is

  • Slides: 68
Download presentation
Orthotic Devices

Orthotic Devices

Orthotic Devices -Definition An orthosis is a mechanical device that applies forces to the

Orthotic Devices -Definition An orthosis is a mechanical device that applies forces to the body in an effort to: support limit stabilize moving parts assist and improve motion correct and align deformities prevent and protect susceptible areas.

Orthotic Devices -Definition “orthos” - straight, normal, or true.

Orthotic Devices -Definition “orthos” - straight, normal, or true.

Orthotic Devices -Classification Prefabricated Custom molded

Orthotic Devices -Classification Prefabricated Custom molded

Orthotic Device -Prescription The prescription of an orthosis requires an understanding of the pathology

Orthotic Device -Prescription The prescription of an orthosis requires an understanding of the pathology of the disorder to be treated and must take into account: Goals to be achieved Knowledge of anatomy, biomechanics, and kinesiology Understanding of the indications (positive effects) and limitations (negative effects) of the orthosis

Upper Limb Orthosis-Classification ü Static ü Dynamic ü Hybrid

Upper Limb Orthosis-Classification ü Static ü Dynamic ü Hybrid

Upper Limb Orthotic - Goals It is the preservation or restoration of hand function

Upper Limb Orthotic - Goals It is the preservation or restoration of hand function that we strive for with upper limb orthotics.

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals Five common goals for upper limb orthotics: 1. Substitute for

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals Five common goals for upper limb orthotics: 1. Substitute for weak or absent muscles 2. Protect damaged or diseased segments by limiting load or motion 3. Prevention of deformity 4. Correction of contracture 5. Attachment of other assistive devices

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 1. Substitute for weak or absent muscles

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 1. Substitute for weak or absent muscles

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 2. Protect damaged or diseased segments by limiting load or

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 2. Protect damaged or diseased segments by limiting load or motion

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 3. Prevention of deformity

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 3. Prevention of deformity

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 4. Correction of contracture

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 4. Correction of contracture

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 5. Attachment of other assistive devices

Upper Limb Orthotic Goals 5. Attachment of other assistive devices

Orthotic Devices -Bimechanical Principles The five principles include: 1. Three-point control concept 2. Tissue

Orthotic Devices -Bimechanical Principles The five principles include: 1. Three-point control concept 2. Tissue tolerance to compression and shear forces 3. The biomechanics of levers and forces 4. Selection of materials 5. Static versus dynamic control

Bimechanical Principles 1. Three-point control concept

Bimechanical Principles 1. Three-point control concept

Bimechanical Principles 2. Tissue tolerance to compression and shear forces

Bimechanical Principles 2. Tissue tolerance to compression and shear forces

Bimechanical Principles 3. The biomechanics of levers and forces

Bimechanical Principles 3. The biomechanics of levers and forces

Bimechanical Principles 4. Selection of materials

Bimechanical Principles 4. Selection of materials

Bimechanical Principles 5. Static versus dynamic control

Bimechanical Principles 5. Static versus dynamic control

Anatomical principles

Anatomical principles

Common upperlimb orthotic devices Hand finger orthosis

Common upperlimb orthotic devices Hand finger orthosis

Common upperlimb orthotic devices • Wrist-Hand-Finger Orthosis

Common upperlimb orthotic devices • Wrist-Hand-Finger Orthosis

Common upperlimb orthotic devices • Wrist-Hand-Finger Orthosis

Common upperlimb orthotic devices • Wrist-Hand-Finger Orthosis

Common upperlimb orthotic devices • Shoulder orthoses

Common upperlimb orthotic devices • Shoulder orthoses

Common upperlimb orthotic devices

Common upperlimb orthotic devices

Upperlimb orthotic devices

Upperlimb orthotic devices

Radial nerve palsy What could possibly go wrong? Ana Poljičanin, MD. Ph. D. 1,

Radial nerve palsy What could possibly go wrong? Ana Poljičanin, MD. Ph. D. 1, 2 , PMR resident Mentor: Asja Tukić, MD. MSc. 1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University Hospital Split, Croatia 1 School of Medicine University of Split, Croatia 2 AAF Salzburg, June 2015.

Case characteristics Male, 32 years 05. 2014. high speed motor vehicle accident § Polytrauma

Case characteristics Male, 32 years 05. 2014. high speed motor vehicle accident § Polytrauma § Humeral shaft fracture § Left arm paralysis: Brachial plexus contusion Radial nerve transection § II-IV left carpometacarpal joint subluxation § Fracture of left proximal phalanx of index finger

Humeral mid-shaft fracture ü represent 1 to 3% of all fractures. ü Bimodal age

Humeral mid-shaft fracture ü represent 1 to 3% of all fractures. ü Bimodal age distribution: first peak males/ 30 yr/ high velocity trauma second peak females/ 70 yr/low velocity falls N. B. 32 yr – 14. 05. 2014. X –ray of left antebrachuim

Humeral shaft fracture Early nerve exploration indications: 1. Vascular injury 2. High velocity gunshot

Humeral shaft fracture Early nerve exploration indications: 1. Vascular injury 2. High velocity gunshot wounds 3. High suspicion of nerve laceration 4. Severe soft tissue injury 5. Sharp/penetrating injury Elton SG. J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24: 569– 574.

Humeral shaft fracture Plating is the most common form of internal fixation of humeral

Humeral shaft fracture Plating is the most common form of internal fixation of humeral fractures and preferred in patients with concomitant nerve injury because the nerve may be explored during the procedure. . Elton SG. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2008; 24: 569– 574.

Humeral shaft fractures

Humeral shaft fractures

Radial nerve palsy 75 – 90% of radial nerve injuries at presentation are neuropraxias

Radial nerve palsy 75 – 90% of radial nerve injuries at presentation are neuropraxias that resolve without intervention. Grinsell D. Bio. Med Research International. 2014. ID 698256

Radial nerve reconstruction Direct nerve repair with epineural microsutures is still the gold standard

Radial nerve reconstruction Direct nerve repair with epineural microsutures is still the gold standard surgical treatment for severe axontomesis and neurotmesis. Grinsell D. Bio. Med Research International. 2014. ID 698256

Radial nerve palsy Colditz JC. J Hand Therapy. 1987; 1: 18 -23. The hallmark

Radial nerve palsy Colditz JC. J Hand Therapy. 1987; 1: 18 -23. The hallmark of a radial nerve injury is wrist drop.

Radial palsy rehabilitation Colditz JC. J Hand Therapy. 1987; 1: 18 -23. Comparison of

Radial palsy rehabilitation Colditz JC. J Hand Therapy. 1987; 1: 18 -23. Comparison of the normal tenodesis of the hand the altered grasp/release pattern of radial nerve palsy.

Radial nerve palsy splinting Colditz JC. J Hand Therapy. 1987; 1: 18 -23. Recreates

Radial nerve palsy splinting Colditz JC. J Hand Therapy. 1987; 1: 18 -23. Recreates harmony of tenodesis action: Finger extension with wrist flexion and wrist extension with finger flexion.

Radial nerve palsy splinting

Radial nerve palsy splinting

Radial nerve palsy Recovery timeline EMG follow up 2 mo Complete denervation 4 mo

Radial nerve palsy Recovery timeline EMG follow up 2 mo Complete denervation 4 mo Complete denervation Reinervation typically occur at this stage 11 mo Complete denervation

Recovery complications Brachial plexus contusion

Recovery complications Brachial plexus contusion

Erb´s palsy -recovery timeline EMG follow up 2 mo Complete denervation 4 mo Reinervation

Erb´s palsy -recovery timeline EMG follow up 2 mo Complete denervation 4 mo Reinervation 11 mo Reinervation

Recovery complications: Humeral shaft fracture Four surgical approaches: 1. Posterior 2. Anterolateral 3. Anterior

Recovery complications: Humeral shaft fracture Four surgical approaches: 1. Posterior 2. Anterolateral 3. Anterior 4. Anteromedial

Recovery complications: Humeral shaft fracture Different operation techniques performed in treating humeral shaft fractures

Recovery complications: Humeral shaft fracture Different operation techniques performed in treating humeral shaft fractures resulted from different incidences of postsurgical radial nerve palsies which varied from 0% to 5. 1% Kirin I. Wien Klin Wochenschr (2011) 123: 83– 87.

Recovery complications: Humeral shaft fracture Four surgical approaches: 1. Posterior 2. Anterolateral 3. Anterior

Recovery complications: Humeral shaft fracture Four surgical approaches: 1. Posterior 2. Anterolateral 3. Anterior 4. Anteromedial

Recovery complications: Humeral shaft fracture None of the patients who had osteosynthesis by using

Recovery complications: Humeral shaft fracture None of the patients who had osteosynthesis by using plate on anteromedial humeral surface had lesions of the radial nerve. Kirin I. Wien Klin Wochenschr (2011) 123: 83– 87.

Recovery complication: Hand injury http: //www. radiologyassistant. nl/en/p 42 a 29 e c 06

Recovery complication: Hand injury http: //www. radiologyassistant. nl/en/p 42 a 29 e c 06 b 9 e 8/wrist-carpal-instability. html Trapezoid dislocations are missed in up to 30% of patients on initial assessment.

What the future brings? ü Removal of osteosynthetic material ü Intensive rehabilitation ü How

What the future brings? ü Removal of osteosynthetic material ü Intensive rehabilitation ü How long should we wait for nerve recovery to occur? ü When should we consult plastic surgeon?

Gait Aids – Canes and Crutches When properly positioned, can decrease the amount of

Gait Aids – Canes and Crutches When properly positioned, can decrease the amount of muscle force necessary to stabilize a joint. This in turn leads to attenuation of joint reaction forces and decreased pain symptoms.

Gait Aids -Walker

Gait Aids -Walker

Spinal Orthosis

Spinal Orthosis

Control of Motion

Control of Motion

Trunk Support Trunk support is achieved by an increase in the intra- abdominal pressure.

Trunk Support Trunk support is achieved by an increase in the intra- abdominal pressure.

Spinal Alignment

Spinal Alignment

Spinal Orthosis

Spinal Orthosis

Negative Effect of Orthotic Devices • • • Weaknes, atrophy and contracture Skin irritation

Negative Effect of Orthotic Devices • • • Weaknes, atrophy and contracture Skin irritation Impaired ambulation and balance Decrease in pulmonary capacity Psyhological dependence

Clinical Uses for Spinal Orthotics

Clinical Uses for Spinal Orthotics

Cervical orthoses - Schantz Collar

Cervical orthoses - Schantz Collar

Biomechanics of the Spine

Biomechanics of the Spine

Biomechanics of the Spine

Biomechanics of the Spine

Denis Spinal Columns

Denis Spinal Columns

Fracture Classification

Fracture Classification

Fracture Classification

Fracture Classification

Spinal Orthosis- Jewwett Orthosis

Spinal Orthosis- Jewwett Orthosis

Spinal Orthosis- Jewwett Orthosis

Spinal Orthosis- Jewwett Orthosis

Spinal Orthoses- Taylor´s Brace

Spinal Orthoses- Taylor´s Brace

Spinal Orthosis- Body Jacket

Spinal Orthosis- Body Jacket

Milwaukee Brace

Milwaukee Brace

ana. poljicanin@mefst. hr

ana. poljicanin@mefst. hr