Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support UPDATE Presented by the Oregon Department of Education November 19, 2012

Today’s Topics 1. Resources • • Educator Effectiveness Toolkit Performance Rubrics 2. Updated Timeline • 2013 -14 3. Professional Development & Technical Assistance

Resources q Educator Effectiveness Website § Educator Evaluation Toolkit http: //www. ode. state. or. us/search/page/? id=3759

Resources Performance Rubrics http: //www. ode. state. or. us/search/page/? id=3784 ü Posted rubrics are aligned to the INTASC and Oregon ISLLCbased standards ü Districts may adopt or adapt; adaptations must be aligned to the standards ü July 1, 2013 submission template will include check box for listed rubrics and upload for other rubrics /crosswalk ü District selection of their rubric (adopt/adapt/develop) must be part of the collaborative design process

Resources Performance Rubrics Teacher Danielson’s Framework for Teaching and Evaluation Robert Marzano Teacher Evaluation Rubric Kim Marshall Teacher Evaluation Rubric Salem-Keizer School District Licensed Staff Assessment and Evaluation Rubric Administrator Salem-Keizer School District Administrative Assessment and Evaluation Rubric Additional administrator rubrics are under review and will be added to the list by the end of December.

Resources Performance Rubrics Work underway: üAdditional administrator rubrics will be posted by end of December 2012 üODE & Education Northwest/ Regional Comprehensive Center developing administrator rubric directly aligned to the Oregon Educational Leadership/ISLLC Standards üExamples from school districts

Resources Performance Rubrics ü Future data will be collected based on the state adopted standards and Oregon’s Framework. ODE will work with stakeholders and technical experts to design a meaningful reporting system that takes into account rubrics that are “crosswalked” to the standards

Resources A collaborate design process is essential for adopting/adapting/developing rubrics Design Process Resources • ODE Toolkit • Performance Evaluation Process, Chalkboard Project • Oregon Education Association Center for Great Public Schools Teacher Evaluation & Support System Guidebook https: //dl. dropbox. com/u/8355771/oea_gps_evaluationguidebook_2012 -2. pdf

Resources A collaborate design process is essential for adopting/adapting rubrics Self-assessment questions: ü Do we have In. TASC and Oregon ISLLC Standards already in place? ü What are our plans to train our teachers/administrators on using the standards to promote effective practice? ü Do we currently have a 4 -level rubric in place that is aligned to the standards? ü How does our rubric compare with the ODE provided samples? ü Do we want to adopt/adapt these rubrics? If we adapt, what changes will we make? ü Are there specialists who need different indicators to more accurately describe what they do? ü What is our staff’s level of understanding of our rubric? ü What are our plans to provide professional development to teachers and administrators?

Updated Timeline for 2013 -14 • By July 1, 2013, all districts will submit their new evaluation and support systems and implementation plans for the 20132014 school year • During the 2013 -2014 school year* – All evaluations of teachers and administrators will be under the new evaluation system (as per SB 290) – Districts will implement initial plans of their evaluation systems; utilizing this time to refine their local systems – Student learning and growth must be measured, however it does not have to be included in the summative evaluation

Updated Timeline By July 1, 2013 all districts will submit implementation plans for their revised evaluation system During the 2013 -2014 school year – All evaluations of teachers and administrators will be under the new evaluation system to comply with SB 290 – Districts will implement initial plans for their revised evaluation and support systems and utilize this year to refine their local systems – Because it’s the first year, student learning and growth results will be not required in the summative evaluation

Professional Development and Technical Assistance • Thurs Afternoon: • Overview of CCSS • Friday All Day • Review of standards • Review of sample assessment items • Plan for implementation and formative assessments Budget Narrative and Monitoring Support • Thurs Afternoon: • Overview of requirements • Friday All Day: • District teams • Support on process and guidance • Work with SB 252 coaches to establish process and work toward preparation for July 1, 2013 deadline Common Core State Standards/SBAC Educator Effectiveness Oregon Association for Comprehensive Education (OACE) Conference January 24 -25, Seaside Oregon • Friday All Day • Direct district support from ODE to complete BNWSK process for 2012 -13 school year • Direct support from ODE on monitoring notebooks

Professional Development and Technical Assistance • Topics of Interest – – – Multiple measures: Student learning and growth Student growth goal setting process Standards of professional practice Link between evaluation and professional development Multiple measures: professional responsibilities Conducting collaborative process/conversations • Communications – FAQ • Best practices/models/templates