Optics Design of the CEPC Interaction Region Yiwei
- Slides: 30
Optics Design of the CEPC Interaction Region Yiwei Wang, Dou Wang, Sha Bai, Huiping Geng, Feng Su, Tianjian Bian, Yingshun Zhu, Jie Gao, Gang XU Accelerator Center, IHEP CEPC 2014, Shanghai 12 Sep 2014
Outline • Introduction • Optics Design of the Interaction Region for L*=2. 5 m • Primary Optics Design of the Interaction Region for L*=1. 5 m • Summary and Further Work
Introduction • Functions of Interaction Region (IR) optics – Provide very small beta function to achieve very small beam size: βy*=1. 2 mm, σy*=0. 16 um, for CEPC – Correct large chromaticity due to small beta function: W~L*/ βy* IP FT CCY CCX MT FT: final telescopic transformer CCY: chromatic correction section Y M=-I CCX: chromatic correction section X M=-I CEPC IR L*=1. 5 m, Sep 2014, by Yiwei Wang MT: matching telescopic transformer
Introduction • In the past several months we worked on a IR design for L*=2. 5 m – IR Optics and optimization dynamic aperture of whole ring – Dynamic aperture is small due to large chromaticity at final doublet which is difficult to well correct – Reduce chromaticity at final doublet by reducing L* from 2. 5 m to 1. 5 m • primary design for L*=1. 5 m due to time being
Optics Design of the Interaction Region (L*=2. 5 m) • Based on Yunhai Cai’s design L*=2. 5 m βx*=0. 8 m βy*=1. 2 mm entrance βx*=75. 6 m βy*=25. 6 m
Final Doublet lattice function (L*=2. 5 m) IP L*=2. 5 m Q 1: L=0. 56 m, G=-516 T/m D 2=1. 14 m Q 2: L=0. 58 m, G=364 T/m
The tune dependence on the energy deviation
Dynamic Aperture (L*=2. 5 m) With IR DA for 2%, -2% is 0 3 y 5 x
Dynamic Aperture (L*=2. 5 m) DA for 2%, -2% is 0 4 y By Dou Wang and Demin Chou 5 x
Optimization of the Bandwidth with Octupoles • Octupoles are placed beside each sextupoles Octupole By Feng SU, Aug 2014
Optimization of the Bandwidth with Octupoles By Feng SU, Aug 2014 K 3=0 K 3=15. 5 • DA for on momentum decreased Ø may due to too many octupoles Ø to optimize the number of octupoles and their positions
Optimize the bandwidth by adjusting working point • Optimize the bandwidth by adjusting working point – Idea from CERN people – After reaching the quadrupoles and sextupoles in the ARC, the tune changes, and the momentum bandwidth for x plane is more flat By Sha BAI, Aug 2014
Optimize the bandwidth by adjusting working point On momentum (dp=0) Off momentum (dp=2%) By Sha BAI, Aug 2014
Optimize the bandwidth by adjusting working point • After optimization the momentum bandwidth using the quadrupoles and sextupoles in the Ring, the dynamic aperture in the phase space seems no change. – strong chromatic aberrations in the IR should be the main reason – should go back to optimize the IR
Primary IR optics with L*=1. 5 m (1) • betx*=0. 8 m, bety*=1. 2 mm, L*=1. 5 m IP FT CCY CCX MT Yiwei Wang, 3 Sep 2014 FT: final telescopic transformer CCY: chromatic correction section y CCX: chromatic correction section x MT: matching telescopic transformer
Final Telescopic Transformer IP Q 1 Q 2 L*(D 1) =1. 5 m Q 1: L=0. 76 m, G=-400 T/m D 2=2. 45 m Q 2: L=0. 42 m, G=283 T/m
Optics of whole ring • IR+ARC
Dynamic Aperture • On momentum Off momentum: 2%, 1%
Primary IR design for L*=1. 5 m (2) Yiwei Wang, 11 Sep 2014 IP FT CCY CCX MT L*=1. 5 m βx*=0. 8 m βy*=1. 2 mm entrance βx*=75. 6 m βy*=25. 6 mm CEPC IR L*=1. 5 m, Sep 2014, by Yiwei Wang
Final Doublet lattice function (L*=1. 5 m) IP L*=1. 5 m Q 1: L=1. 25 m, G=-300 T/m D 2=0. 5 m Q 2: L=0. 72 m, G=300 T/m
Chromatic Correction • with total 4 sextupoles in the chromatic correction – For the first try, zero length of sextupoles are used to neglect the finite length effect. – bandwidth of horizontal plane quite good but vertical plane need to be optimized
Beam stay-clear region – Rx=5 σx_inj, Ry=5 σy_inj – x_inj=21. 8 nm, y_inj=2. 2 nm (assume 10% coupling for injection beam) – Inner radius of vacuum chamber at Q 1 and Q 2: 1. 3 cm IP Q 1 Q 2 [m] • Final Doublet L*=1. 5 m Q 1: L=1. 25 m, Rin=1. 3 cm, G=-300 T/m, Rout=20 cm, Lact=1. 6 m D 2=0. 5 m Q 2: L=0. 72 m, Rin=1. 3 cm, G=300 T/m, Rout=20 cm, Lact=1. 05 m vacuum chamber Ry Rx Out aperture of quadrupoles estimated by Yingshun Zhu
Beam stay-clear region (L*=2. 5 m) – Rx=5 σx_inj, Ry=5 σy_inj – x_inj=21. 8 nm, y_inj=2. 2 nm (assume 10% coupling for injection beam) – Inner radius of vacuum chamber at Q 1 and Q 2: 1. 8 cm IP Q 1 Q 2 [m] • Final Doublet vacuum chamber L*=2. 5 m Q 1: L=0. 56 m, R=1. 8 cm, G=-516 T/m D 2=1. 14 m Q 2: L=0. 58 m, R=1. 8 cm, G=364 T/m Ry Rx
Primary IR design for L*=1. 5 m • get a primary IR optics design for L*=1. 5 m due to time being • The work on dynamic aperture with IR in undergoing.
Summary • Several method to optimizing dynamic aperture for the IR Optics L*=2. 5 m have been tried – transfer matrix to instead real arc In order to optimize the IR independent of ARC – Optimization of bandwidth with Octupoles – Optimize the bandwidth by adjusting working point – Dynamic aperture is small due to large chromaticity at final doublet which is difficult to well correct • Reduce chromaticity at final doublet by reducing L* from 2. 5 m to 1. 5 m – primary design for L*=1. 5 m due to time being – The work on dynamic aperture with IR in undergoing.
Further Work • Further optimize IR bandwidth with transfer matrix for the ARC • Further optimize the aperture with IR and ARC together
Reserved
CEPC Dynamic Aperture (ARC only) • Dynamic Aperture of the ring with ARC only – IR optics is replaced by the straight section with same length – Working point: 206. 08/206. 22 Without FFS 509. 3σy 2%, -2%的孔径是 0 1%,-1% On momentum 59. 2σx
CEPC lattice with IR In this design: • Circumference: 52. 1 km • 16*arcs: 2. 64 km (60 FODO) • 12*short straight: 352 m (8 FODO) • 4*long straight: ~700 m • Bending radius: 5. 7 km • U 0: 3. 77 Ge. V • Nature emittance: 7. 67 nm • Nature energy spread: 0. 19% • Nature bunch length : 2. 82 mm • Momentum compaction: 3. 3 E-5
Treat arcs as transfer matrix • Calculate transfer matrix for arc 1 and arc 2 by SAD. • Join the real lattice for IP 1 and IP 3 with the matrix of two arcs. • Track DA by SAD for the faked ring (240 turns). Ø two “point” cavities at IP 2 and IP 4
- Difference between ray optics and wave optics
- Venn diagram of geometric optics and physical optics
- Cepc logo
- Cepc logo
- M
- Active region and saturation region
- Rainbow optics star spectroscope
- Ecological optics
- Turba optics
- Optical power loss
- Unilab
- Bill nye reflection and refraction
- Grade 10 optics review
- Basic electricity and optics
- Bill nye light optics worksheet
- Plane mirror diagram
- Hotwire fiber optics
- Single slit envelope
- Http //www.phys.hawaii.edu/ teb/optics/java/slitdiffr/
- With the rule astigmatism axis
- Geometric optics problems
- Fourier optics
- Vergence formula
- The computational complexity of linear optics
- Smells law
- Bill nye light energy
- Introduction to fiber optics
- Cauchy formula optics
- Adaptive optics
- What is optics
- Geometric optics ppt