On the Constitutive Construction of Perceptability at TransDisciplinary

On the Constitutive Construction of Perceptability at Trans-Disciplinary and Meta-Academic Boundaries (Or, Can Social Scientists Write More Clearly? ) Oliver Marsh Science and Technology Studies, University College London oliver. marsh. 13@ucl. ac. uk @Sideways. Science sidewayslookatscience. wordpress. com

Michael Billig 1) Nominalization and abstraction 2) Novelty over consistency 3) Academic Culture

Alan Sokal 1) Metaphors 2) Rhetorical Slippage 3) Ambiguity between strong and weak claims 4) The Emperor’s New Clothes … i. e. Deliberate obfustication to hide emptiness

The Bad Writing Contest “As usual, ” commented Denis Dutton, editor of Philosophy and Literature, “this year’s winners were produced by well-known, highly-paid experts who have no doubt labored for years to write like this. That these scholars must know what they are doing is indicated by the fact that the winning entries were all published by distinguished presses and academic journals. ” Professor Butler’s first-prize sentence appears in “Further Reflections on the Conversations of Our Time, ” an article in the scholarly journal Diacritics (1997): The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power. Dutton remarked that “it’s possibly the anxiety-inducing obscurity of such writing that has led Professor Warren Hedges of Southern Oregon University to praise Judith Butler as ‘probably one of the ten smartest people on the planet’. ” http: //denisdutton. com/bad_writing. htm

Some final tropes… (None of these are meant as hard and fast rules, but they’re worth looking out for…). 1. Nouns vs. verbs 2. Overblown reference (“it is itself constitutive of the very heart of the matter…”) 3. Concept jigsaws / chains (‘performative and constitutive’) 4. Wordplay as ‘discovery’ (e. g. ‘Gaiapolitics’, ‘it constitutes not a relativity of truth but, on the contrary, a truth of the relative’). 5. Anything that makes outsiders unwelcome.

Oliver Marsh Science and Technology Studies, University College London oliver. marsh. 13@ucl. ac. uk @Sideways. Science sidewayslookatscience. wordpress. com