Office of the Secretary of Defense Test Resource

Office of the Secretary of Defense Test Resource Management Center Test & Evaluation/Science & Technology Opportunities June 8, 2015 1

Test Resource Management Center Presenters • Moderator: Mr. Robert Heilman • Principal Director, TRMC: Mr. Derrick Hinton • TRMC STEM Lead: Ms. Denise De La Cruz

Our Objective Today • Raise awareness of the mission of the Test Management Resource Center • Describe the opportunities available through our Test & Evaluation / Science & Technology Program • Discuss the future and its impact on Test & Evaluation • Raise awareness of the TRMC STEM Initiative

Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) Overview Derrick Hinton Principal Deputy, TRMC 4

TRMC Organization Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Hon Frank Kendall ASD(R&E) Mr. Al Shaffer, Acting Starting July 2015 DASD(DT&E) PD, DT&E Dr. Brian Hall Sheila Wright Staff Director Col Erik Webb, USA Dr. C. David Brown Director, National Cyber Range Pete Christensen Deputy Director, Corporate Operations & MRTFB Policy Dir, TRMC PD, TRMC Mr. Derrick Hinton Deputy Director, T&E Range Oversight Deputy Director, Tech. Development George Rumford Bruce Bailey T&E/S&T Program PM George Rumford Chief Financial Officer Bruce Buchner Deputy Director, Test Capabilities Development Gerry Christeson EWIIP PM Gerry Christeson Deputy Director, Interoperability Chip Ferguson JMETC Program PM Chip Ferguson CTEIP PM Chris Paust Effective April 1, 2011, the DASD(DT&E) serves concurrently as Director, TRMC 5

Game-Changing Technologies Challenges in Hypersonic T&E • Hypersonic flight environment is difficult to replicate on the ground • Hypersonic flows are difficult to accurately model Scramjet Test at NASA Langley Arc Jet Heater Material Development Challenges • • • Extreme heat requiring Thermal Protection System (TPS), shell made of advanced materials TPS materials tested in Arc Jet Heaters up to 180 atmospheres & 13, 000 deg. R Arc jets achieve these extreme temperatures by flowing high pressure air over an electric arc and through a supersonic nozzle Bottom Line: Designing test facilities is just as challenging as designing hypersonic flight vehicles Hypersonic Vehicle in Flight

Game-Changing Technologies Managing T&E of Autonomous Systems We Must Transform T&E Culture We Must Develop Accepted • Cross-domain standards, metrics, and test methodologies • Human-Robot interactions • Multiple interacting domains (Air, Land, Sea, Undersea) ranges Georgia Tech Research Institute Study To assess and develop an approach to gaps and required investments in T&E infrastructure for autonomous systems 7

Test and Evaluation Range in Action Bidirectional Secure Range Network OTHER RANGES CEC Unmanned Systems & Networks TAC NET C 2 CONTROL NET Mobile Apps & Adaptive Networks Joint Task Force UNCLASSIFIED C 4 I Providers Range Control Facility 8

TRMC Mission T&E Infrastructure MRTFB Planning, Assessment and Oversight T&E Investments Test & Evaluation/Science & Technology (T&E/S&T) Program T&E advanced technology development Strategic Plan for Do. D T&E Resources Updated every 2 years in coordination with the Military Departments, Defense Agencies, and specified OSD offices T&E Budget Certification Certify to the Secretary of Defense adequacy of Do. D T&E Budgets Central Test & Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) T&E capability development Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) T&E distributed test integration National Cyber Range (NCR) Cyber T&E Environment 9

Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB): The “Critical Core” 23 Sites: Army-8; Navy-6; Air Force-7; Defense Agency-2 Legend: Army, Navy, AF, Defense Agency Cold Regions Test Center Nevada Test and Training Range NUWC Keyport (Nanoose & Dabob Ranges) Utah Test and Training Range DISA NAWC-WD China Lake West Desert Test Center Aberdeen Test Center 30 th Space Wing NAWC-AD Patuxent River Electronic Proving Ground NAWC-WD Point Mugu Arnold Engineering Development Complex 412 th Test Wing Yuma Test Center Tropic Regions Test Center, various locations Updated 21 Apr 2014 PMRF 45 th Space Wing DISA, JITC U. S. Army Kwajalein Atoll Reagan Test Site 96 th Test Wing (Includes 96 th Test Group) White Sands Test Center Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center 10

Test & Evaluation / Science & Technology (T&E/S&T) Program Mission: Develop Technologies Required to Test Future Warfighting Capabilities l Established in FY 02 l l l Joint DDR&E / DOT&E Initiative Transitioned to TRMC in FY 05 l l RDT&E Budget Activity 3 funds Purpose l l l Annual Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs) l Tri-Service working groups l High Risk / High Payoff R&D for Testing Foster technology transition to major Do. D test ranges Risk reduction for test capabilities developments l l l Academia Industry Government Laboratories Validate requirements Evaluate proposals Facilitate technology transition 82 Active Projects Central Oversight – Distributed Execution Eight Test Technology Areas High Speed Systems 14 Active Projects Unmanned & Autonomous Systems 4 Active Projects Spectrum Efficiency 13 Active Projects Advanced Instrumentation 11 Active Projects Directed Energy Cyberspace Electronic Warfare 14 Active Projects 3 Active Projects 15 Active Projects C 4 I & Software Intensive Systems 8 Active Projects Shaping Technology into Tomorrow’s T&E Capabilities 11

Central Test & Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) Mission: Develop or Improve Major Test Capabilities that have Multi-Service Utility l Ø Established in FY 91 by Congress with 6. 4 RDT&E funds Long-Term Multi-Service Investments Joint Improvement & Modernization (JIM) Core EW • 3 -5 year requirement horizon • Special Do. D area of emphasis • EMD of major test capabilities • EMD of electronic warfare (EW) test capabilities • Must address multi-Service need • Development, not procurement • Services & Agencies budget for O&M over life-cycle • $110 -120 M/year • Focus is on assessing performance of aircraft against complex new threats • Service budget for life-cycle O&M Ø Near-Term Investments Resource Enhancement Project (REP) Threat Systems Project (TSP) • 1 -2 year requirement horizon • EMD of instrumentation needed to address an emergent requirement • Must address OT shortfalls • Coordinated with DOT&E • $18 -20 M/year • 1 -2 year horizon • Address shortfalls in threat systems representation • Coordinated with DOT&E • $3 -5 M/year Annual review of near term OT requirements Annual review • Total cost ~$465 over ~7 years Bi-annual Multi-Service T&E Reliance Nomination Process Multiple Do. D EW studies of threat needs Requirements Drivers 19 JIM, 6 EW, 13 REP, 11 TSP = 49 Projects 12

Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) Program Secret Network Boeing Lab. Net Tukwila Keyport NUWC Site in Alaska Ft. Greely: CRTC Leverages the SECRET Defense Research and Engineering Network (SDREN) for connectivity • Operates only at the SECRET classification • Continuous monitoring, troubleshooting, and optimization of the end-to-end network infrastructure • Capable of supporting numerous simultaneous test events Updated Apr 2015 • Rome NY AFRL Newport NUWC Moorestown: CSEDS Edwards (2): Ridley 412 th EWG IFAST China Lake (3): F/A-18, IBAR, TSPIL Point Mugu (3): ITEC, EA-6 B. EW Cy. Con Camp Pendleton: MCTSSA Corona: NSWC Palmdale, Triton Point Loma : SSC-PAC 59140 W. Interconnect Rtr. Rancho Bernardo NGC Triton Sites in Hawaii PMRF: Bldg 105 MHPCC WPAFB: SIMAF USSTRATCOM Dugway Proving Ground Crane (2): NSWC RDT&E, NTN Lab Boeing Lab. Net Berkeley Kirtland AFB DMOC Raytheon Tucson Yuma PG Tinker AFBAWACS Ft Huachuca: (5) JITC, JTDL, CMIS, JTRS, EPG AMRDEC Ft. Sill (2): FSED, SMART Lab WSMR IRCC Redstone (10): SMDC RTC: DTCC, DISTL SED: Patriot, THAAD, FAAD, GSIL, JLENS, MUSE, C-RAM Greenville Rivet Joint Ft. Bliss MCC 76 Current Sites 9 New Sites Planned 7 Connections Points to Other Networks Ft Hood (2): CTSF, TTEC Eglin AFB (5): AOC, DTF, GWEF, KHILS, JDAT GTRI Charleston (2): SSC Data Ctr MEF-MEU LMCO Global Vision Network Melbourne NGC JSTARS Aberdeen: ATC-STE Dahlgren: IWSL Rapid-SIL/C 2 (2) DOC, ICSTF Pax River: (9) E 2 C, E 2 D, MCL, ACETEF, SAIL, ATR, E-2 C SIL, UASIL, MFS ETC SYSCON East Interconnect Rtr. JS J 8 DDC 4 C 4 AD Langley TDLITC Norfolk COMOPTEVFOR Dam Neck CDSA Wallops Island (2): SCSC, SSDS Newport News NGC VASCIC Mc. Lean MITRE NSEL Kingstowne JMETC / TENA SDA Lab Richmond NRO CTE Army Air Force Navy Marines Joint Industry Academia 13

National Cyber Range (NCR) • • Computing Assets/Facility Encapsulation Architecture & Operational Procedures • Provides the ability to rapidly design, deploy and sanitize large scale, high fidelity test and training environments – Extremely malicious threats can be unleashed on operationally, representative systems and networks to assess the impact on the network, networked weapon systems, the associated mission • Significant technological advancements incorporated into integrated tool suite – Highlighted by the significant level of automation – Ability to support up to four concurrent events, executed in completely isolated testbeds, at different levels of classification “DARPA-Hard” Capability • Automated sanitization capability – Expunges all malicious code from every component used within the event and returns it to a pristine state ready for reuse • Integrated SW Testing Toolsuite – Sanitizes not only storage but also servers (including non-volatile RAM) and network equipment • Time saving – In many cases, what previously took weeks or months has been reduced to hours or days – Allowing users the ability to rapidly plan, execute, and analyze their test or training initiatives • NCR also provides SME – Available, at the discretion of the user, to support the planning, execution and analysis of test and training events • NCR is able to collaborate with other cyber ranges using secure networks – When test events require special capabilities or additional scale

A Look at What Drives Impacts to the T&E Infrastructure Why We Need Technology Enhancements 15

50 Years of Exponential Progress We’ve hit the 50 th anniversary of Moore’s Law What does 50 years of exponential progress look like? Produced in 1971 Produced in 2013 4, 000 X Faster 5, 000 X Less Energy 50, 000 X < cost/transistor u 2, 300 transistors u Built by hand u Used in F-14 Tomcat u 1. 4 Billion transistors u 5 Billion transistors built per second u Annual production = 20 Million for every person on earth 16

Living in an Exponential Age Linear Progress Exponential Progress 26 Steps = 26 meters = A walk around Earth A walk across the room 30 steps = Circle Earth 26 X 17

What Did Exponential Increases Provide? 2005 Let’s look at the last The i. Phone was two years away from its 1 st release The first video was uploaded to You. Tube Facebook was a year old, and acquired URL “facebook. com” for $200 K Android was a small startup that Google had just acquired The term “Drone” meant a military weapon system An early prototype autonomous car completed DARPA Grand Challenge for the first time 18

What Did Exponential Increases Provide? 2015 Let’s look at Today i. Phone 6: 32% thinner, 5% lighter, 40% >display, 200% >resolution, 700% >RAM, 800% >storage, 340% >processor, 60% <cost w/ contract Billion users, 300 hours of video uploaded an hour 1. 4 billion users from every country on earth share 2. 5 million pieces of content every minute Over a billion Android users Drones from $50 - $1, 500 used by everyone from kids to Amazon • Google’s autonomous cars have logged > 1 M miles • Every auto manufacturer working on a version 19

Technologies & Trends Leaning into the Future Sensor Fusion Massive increase in connected devices By 2025 we will have 100 billion connected devices = trillion sensor ecosystem Connectivity Cyber Today 2. 8 B of 7 B+ people on earth connected By 2020 entire earth population will be connected The more connected we are, the more we depend 20 on the net, the greater our vulnerability 20 20

Technologies & Trends Leaning into the Future Infinite Computing Every year we produce more computing power than the sum of all previous years – soon to become unlimited and nearly free Autonomy Fully intelligent machines operating with zero human control Augmented Reality Artificial Intelligence Billions of dollars are being invested in full immersion AR and VR By 2025 a computer costing $1 K will have the equivalent processing speed of the human brain. By 2029 it will have human level intelligence. 21 21

5 th Gen T&E Infrastructure Cyber Autonomy • • Emulation of global information infrastructure Testing & employment of learning systems • • Predict behavior of fully autonomous system White box insight into black box system Quantum computing Extending cyber ecosystem to warfighting systems Measure group thinking of autonomous swarm Optimize tasking between human vs AI system Game Changing Technology we need Now • Reducing and Sharing Do. D Spectrum • Advanced Automated Software Defect Detection 22

Test & Evaluation/Science & Technology Program Overview 23

T&E Capability Development Cycle Challenge: T&E Capabilities must be available in time to provide useful insight to decision-makers and warfighters A Materiel Solution Analysis Begin System T&E Planning B Technology Development Articulate T&E Requirements T&E/S&T Program C Engineering and Manufacturing Development Use T&E Capabilities CTEIP and Services I&M Production and Deployment IOT&E uses capabilities Operations and Support SHIF T will r LEFT earli equire er fo re of te cast st infra struc need ture s Cycle for Test Capability Development Must Begin Early 24

T&E/S&T Program Overview Mission: Develop Technologies Required to Test Future Warfighting Capabilities l Established in FY 02 l l l Joint DDR&E / DOT&E Initiative Transitioned to TRMC in FY 05 82 Active Projects RDT&E Budget Activity 3 funds Purpose l l l Annual Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs) l l Tri-Service working groups l High Risk / High Payoff R&D for Testing Foster technology transition to major Do. D test ranges Risk reduction for test capabilities developments l l l Academia Industry Government Laboratories Validate requirements Evaluate proposals Facilitate technology transition Central Oversight – Distributed Execution Current Test Technology Areas High Speed Systems 14 Active Projects Unmanned & Autonomous Systems 4 Active Projects Spectrum Efficiency 13 Active Projects Advanced Instrumentation 11 Active Projects Directed Energy Cyberspace Electronic Warfare 14 Active Projects 3 Active Projects 15 Active Projects C 4 I & Software Intensive Systems 8 Active Projects Shaping Technology into Tomorrow’s T&E Capabilities 25

T&E/S&T Test Technology Area Executing Agent Organizations TRMC HQ Advanced Instrumentation Systems Naval Undersea Warfare Center Army Navy Program Office TRMC HQ Air Force Spectrum Efficiency Edwards AFB High Speed Systems Test Unmanned & Autonomous Systems Test Arnold Engineering Development Center Naval Air Systems Command Cyberspace Test C 4 I & Software Intensive Systems Test Naval Air Systems Command Eglin AFB Directed Energy Test Electronic Warfare Test PEO for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation Central Oversight – Distributed Execution 26

T&E/S&T Program Significant Test Technology Needs (1 of 2) High Speed Systems Test Electronic Warfare Test § Propulsion Scaling Test Techniques § High-Speed EO/IR Scene Generation § Combined Cycle Propulsion Test Methods § Hypersonic Flight Erosion Test Methods § Missile Body & Plume Attitude Measurement § Thermal Protection System Ablation Testing § Real-time, High-Fidelity, High-Density RF Signal Generation § Improved Computational Tools § Multi-Beam Characterization § Radar Clutter Simulation Directed Energy Test § Neutron Environment Simulator to replicate required nuclear effects test environments § In Chamber HPM Source § HPM Electronic Failure Analysis § Characterizing beam propagation through atmosphere & maximizing laser test windows C 4 I & Software Intensive Systems Test § Flexible Test Harness Generator § Automated, Rapid, Agile Test Planning § Removing biases in Distributed Testing § Rapid Analysis of Voluminous Unstructured Data (“Test Data to Decision”) § Determining Required M&S Fidelity in Tests 27

T&E/S&T Program Significant Test Technology Needs (2 of 2) Unmanned & Autonomous Systems Test Cyberspace Test § Predicting autonomous behavior for testing scenarios § Cyberspace test visualization § Enhancing safety of autonomous testing § Improved, scalable cyberspace threat representations § Testing of autonomy components § Defining cyberspace test measurements § Measure autonomous system reliability and performance § Improved cyberspace range turn-around § Controlling swarming target systems § Improved cyberspace analysis Spectrum Efficiency Technology § Multiple Access Schemes for Serial Streaming Telemetry § Modulation Agile Radio for Test Applications § Channel Estimation and Equalization § Steerable Multiband Antenna (L-band, S-band, & C-band) for Airborne Test Articles § Advanced cyberspace instrumentation Adv. Instrumentation Sys. Technology § TSPI without GPS (or with limited GPS) § Measuring body armor / helmet effectiveness § Measuring cognitive workload § Improved weapon characterization and scoring § Mitigating test range impacts from alternative energy solutions 28

T&E/S&T Program Broad Agency Announcements • Topics for Industry, Academia, and Government Laboratories to propose test technology solutions • In-cycle Process – Declared schedule for white paper submissions (deadline) – Requires an allocation of available funding – Priority over out-cycle white papers (must be processed first) • Out-of-cycle Process – White papers submitted anytime after "in-cycle" deadline – Offerors "highly encouraged" to contact Executing Agent before submitting white paper − Ensures interest − Can address whether a 'chance' exists for funding • All BAAs include an “Other Test Technologies” topic to enable offerors to propose test technology developments that were not previously identified by the Government All T&E/S&T BAAs are always open for new white papers

Location of T&E/S&T BAAs www. fbo. gov Keyword: TRMC Note: Change search criteria for “Posted Date” from “Last 90 Days” to “<blank>” ed t a d p U s Topic ed st o P g Bein uly J f o d by En Ou Must ut-of-Cycle Only Discu ss Co with E ncept xecut ing Prior to Sub Agent mittal

T&E/S&T New Project In-Cycle Selection Schedule Activity T&E/S&T New Project Selection Schedule OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Draft BAA Topic Areas Industry/Academia Days Announced through www. fbo. gov Refine BAA Topics Finalized Call for White Papers BAA Topics Announced White Paper Submissions White Paper Reviews BAA Pre-FY Cycle White Papers due in March Proposals Requested from Selected Offerors Proposal Submissions Proposal Review & Clarifications Executing Agents Recommendations to PM PM New Start Decisions Contract Awards Initiated Program Manager Action Executing Agent Action Contracting Officer Action Offeror Action 31

The Proposal — Key Criteria • Meets a T&E need • Requires S&T work • High payoff • Broad application (more than one Do. D test activity)

T&E/S&T Program Summary • T&E/S&T Program initiated to address critical T&E needs tied to S&T drivers – Advancing the state of the art in T&E technologies • The only Do. D S&T program dedicated to T&E • Annual Call to Industry, Academia, and Government Laboratories to address test capability needs • Competitive technology developments to get the best technologies possible to the test community • Focused on transition into needed test capabilities Looking Ahead, Responsive, and Agile 33

Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) STEM Initiative The T&E Future Workforce Denise De La Cruz TRMC STEM Lead 34

TRMC STEM Initiative Investments in minority-serving universities for concept exploration and development of new test technologies (to expand our offeror base) Technology Summer internship program to immerse students in T&E centers Talent Regional outreach and partnerships to promote STEM and the T&E profession across the country Persistent infusion of a diverse supply of technology and talent into the T&E enterprise 35

TRMC STEM Tech Initiative Objective: Establish a broader T&E/S&T Program offeror base by posturing targeted Engineering schools to successfully compete for T&E/S&T technology development Current Partners SCHOOL TOPIC START North Carolina Agriculture & Technical University Autonomous Systems -Fuzzy logic application to a Perception Inference Engine Jan 2014 Florida International University Cyberspace T&E -Instrumenting hypervisors for use in a virtual environment March 2014 Cyberspace Technology Testing & Training Center (CT 3 C) at FIU NCA&T Autonomous Systems Project Team 2014 TRMC Internship Orientation at FIU 36

NC A&T Autonomy Test Technology Research • Autonomous Control and Information Technology Institute (ACIT) – Dr. Abdollah Homaifar, Director • Technology Description – Create an Autonomous System Behavior Prediction Tool – Perception Inference Engine (PIE) − Predict/mimic the behavior of an autonomous system under test without interfering with the operation of the physical system – Two Principal Components − Fuzzy Inference System − Learning Classifier Tool • T&E Application/Value – Predict behavior of autonomous system under varying conditions via sim environment to assist in defining test limits and mitigating risk

2015 Regional Intern Partnerships Legend: Army, Navy, AF, Defense Agency, OSD University Partners 2015 Worksites Cold Regions Test Center Nevada Test and Training Range NUWC Keyport (Nanoose & Dabob Ranges) Utah Test and Training Range NAWC-WD China Lake West Desert Test Center Cal. State Univ. Channel Islands Electronic Proving Ground Aberdeen Test Center NAWC-AD Patuxent River Univ. of Maryland Virginia State Univ. Holloman AFB 412 th Test Wing DISA Morgan State Univ. Wayne State Univ. Lawrence Tech. Univ. Oakland Univ. 30 th Space Wing NAWC-WD Point Mugu TACOM TARDEC New Mexico State New Mexico Tech Univ. of New Mexico Univ. of TX, El Paso Redstone Test Center AMRDEC North Carolina A&T Georgia Tech Arnold Engineering Development Complex Univ. of Alabama A&M Yuma Test Center National Cyber Range 45 th Space Wing Tropic Regions Test Center, various locations PMRF DISA, JITC 96 th Test Wing (Includes 96 th Test Group) White Sands Test Center U. S. Army Kwajalein Atoll Reagan Test Site Center for Countermeasures NAWC-TSD Orlando Florida Int’l Univ. Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center

Sample Intern Worksite 2014 NCA&T Intern Air Combat Environment Test & Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) ACETEF, the Navy’s fully integrated RDT&E Installed Systems Test Facility, provides full spectrum evaluation of highly integrated aircraft and aircraft systems in a secure controlled engineering environment 39

Intern Accomplishments 2014 NCA&T Intern Joint Unmanned Aircraft System Mission Environment (JUAS ME) Project Payload Component – Safety of Flight # Task 1 Assist in developing the technical requirements for an A 2 A radar model that will be used in aircraft ground test to evaluate A 2 A radars against their performance specifications and against competitor A 2 A radars Aid in development of the A 2 A radar model fundamentals using the Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) technical computing language Assist in development and analysis of data from the Collision Risk (CR) tool that, when combined with other technical data, will assess the UAS Target Level of Safety (TLS) in a given Airspace environment 2 3 Air Traffic Analysis CR Value Airspace Analysis Ownship Perfmc. Specs. UAS TLS # = collisions per flight hour

STEM Connect Building a foundation to connect today’s STEM professionals with tomorrow’s future workforce Adopt-A-School Barcroft Elementary School South Arlington, VA Cool Boys Book Club • Reading enrichment from male role models for elementary boys Girls for Engineering, Math & Science (GEMS) • STEM Enrichment program with female role models for elementary girls Flexible Learning Experience – Aviation Classroom Experience (FLEX-ACE) Orlando, FL Washington, DC Supporting immersive classroom experiences to promote the importance of T&E in STEM curriculum • Investments in underserved populations promote higher education in STEM career fields Virginia FIRST Robotics / International Test & Evaluation Association (ITEA) Robotics Competition Pairing technical SME’s with opportunities to volunteer supporting hands on learning through robotics and engineering programs FLEX-ACE Students at work Oakridge High School FLEX ACE Lab 2014 ITEA / Virginia FIRST Robotics Competition 41

Our Goal Through our resources and partnerships, place 5, 000 interns across the T&E enterprise in 5 years Implementation We will nurture, cultivate, track and prepare these young minds to enter and transform the T&E Community Our Request & Challenge to You Join us in preparing T&E for the future 42

Questions? Test Resource Management Center 4800 Mark Center Drive, Suite 07 J 22 Alexandria, VA 22350 -3700 Phone: 571 -372 -2700 FAX: 571 -372 -2678 http: //www. acq. osd. mil/dte-trmc/ Ms. Denise De La Cruz TRMC Test and Evaluation Range Oversight (TERO), Army Lead STEM Lead 571 -372 -2733 denise. b. delacruz. civ@mail. mil Mr. Chris Paust CTEIP Program Manager christopher. w. paust. civ@mail. m il (571) 372 -2732 Dr. C. David Brown DASD(DT&E) / Director, TRMC clarence. d. brown. civ@mail. mil (703) 697 -3443 Mr. George Rumford Deputy Director, Technology Development T&E/S&T Program Manager george. j. rumford. civ@mail. mil (571) 372 -2711 Mr. Gerry Christeson Deputy Director, Test Capabilities Development gerald. f. christeson. civ@mail. mil (571) 372 -2712 Mr. Derrick Hinton Principal Deputy Director, TRMC george. d. hinton 2. civ@mail. mil (571) 372 -2761 Mr. Chip Ferguson Deputy Director, Interoperability JMETC Program Manager bernard. b. ferguson. civ@mail. mil (571) 372 -2697 Mr. Pete Christensen Director, National Cyber Range peter. h. christensen. civ@mail. mil (571) 372 -2699