OACP Care Providers CQC Update Chloe Hawkins May

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
OACP Care Providers: CQC Update Chloe Hawkins May 2017

OACP Care Providers: CQC Update Chloe Hawkins May 2017

What do the overall ratings mean? Outstanding The service is performing exceptionally well. Good

What do the overall ratings mean? Outstanding The service is performing exceptionally well. Good The service is performing well and meeting our expectations. Requires improvement The service isn't performing as well as it should and we have told the service how it must improve. Inadequate The service is performing badly and we've taken action against the person or organisation that runs it. 2

National overall ratings…. 100 15, 519 (76%) 50 4, 326 (21%) 377 (2%) 290

National overall ratings…. 100 15, 519 (76%) 50 4, 326 (21%) 377 (2%) 290 (1%) 0 Inadequate Source: CQC – 1 February 2017 Requires improvement Good Outstanding 3

…and by key question Safe 4 Effective 2 Caring 1 Responsive 1 Well-led 21

…and by key question Safe 4 Effective 2 Caring 1 Responsive 1 Well-led 21 77 1 90 17 0% <0. 5 70 7 4 Source: CQC – 1 February 2017 26 2 2 80 24 2 71 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 4

National change in overall rating following inspection 6

National change in overall rating following inspection 6

And the breakdown? 7

And the breakdown? 7

Oxfordshire overall ratings…. 100 185 (80%) 50 38 (16%) 4 (2%) 0 Inadequate Source:

Oxfordshire overall ratings…. 100 185 (80%) 50 38 (16%) 4 (2%) 0 Inadequate Source: CQC – 22 May 2017 Requires improvement Good Outstanding 8

April 2017 Oxfordshire: 73 services which have been rated more than once Note: Figures

April 2017 Oxfordshire: 73 services which have been rated more than once Note: Figures on chart show percentage of locations Source: CQC ratings data extracted 03/04/2017 9

ASC Oxfordshire: Overall Ratings change from first to last inspection Source: CQC ratings data

ASC Oxfordshire: Overall Ratings change from first to last inspection Source: CQC ratings data extracted 03/04/2017 10

Oxfordshire Key Question summary • Overall improvement was positive, with all Inadequate services becoming

Oxfordshire Key Question summary • Overall improvement was positive, with all Inadequate services becoming Good and 55% of services originally rated as Requires Improvement being rated Good on most recent inspection. • Caring showed the least change, in line with the general national trend. • The Effective domain had the largest proportion of locations improving by a narrow margin (51% vs. next largest improvement of 45%) but also the largest proportion of locations deteriorating by quite a large margin (17% deteriorated on Effective vs. 11% on Caring). 11

CQC’s internal quality assurance Reports • Peer review by another inspector • Sign off

CQC’s internal quality assurance Reports • Peer review by another inspector • Sign off by inspection manager • Overall outstanding go to a regional panel chaired by Head of inspection Breaches of regulation • CQC’s ‘Enforcement decision tree’ applied – risk assessment tool to assess the impact and likelihood of re-occurrence which determines the seriousness of the concern. Recommendation as to what enforcement action should be taken. Into and out of special measures • All reviewed at a regional panel chaired by enforcement leads 12

Themes from Well-Led– Inadequate • Unawareness of best practice and notifications not being made

Themes from Well-Led– Inadequate • Unawareness of best practice and notifications not being made to CQC • Lack of supervision and training opportunities • Ineffective systems to identify and manage risks / no process to assess lessons learned • Regular management changes / no registered manager • Poor care planning / lack of personalised care • Closed culture – views not listened to or acted on • Underdeveloped partnership working and community links CQC Published reports – sampled for data on well-led. Sample size 177, 50 services with outstanding ratings (all outstanding ratings for well-led when the sample was extracted) for and 127 for services with inadequate ratings for well-led.

Themes from Well-Led– Outstanding • People who use services, relatives and staff speak highly

Themes from Well-Led– Outstanding • People who use services, relatives and staff speak highly of the service • Effective monitoring and quality assurance • 75% of services had a registered manager in post consistently • Open culture – people who use services/ staff/ relatives shared views and issues • Good leadership extends beyond the manager and includes the provider • A can do, will do attitude • Strong links with local community • Safe care actively promoted – effective oversight of care and staff communication CQC Published reports – sampled for data on well-led. Sample size 177, 50 services with outstanding ratings (all outstanding ratings for well-led when the sample was extracted) for and 127 for services with inadequate ratings for well-led.

Outstanding characteristics • People are at the centre and staff want to give them

Outstanding characteristics • People are at the centre and staff want to give them a life not just a service • Good leadership extends beyond the manager and those values are cascaded to inspire staff • Open culture – people who use services/ staff/ relatives shared views and issues • Strong links with local community • 75% have registered manager in post consistently • A can do, will do attitude – staff dedication • Safe care actively promoted – effective oversight of care and staff communication 15

Passion Excellence Integrity Cooperation Common themes from ‘well-led’: Outstanding “This place is brilliant, management

Passion Excellence Integrity Cooperation Common themes from ‘well-led’: Outstanding “This place is brilliant, management care so much, as do the staff, everybody knows their role and the atmosphere is amazing. ” “I’m made to feel important, I’m constantly encouraged to always better myself. ” CQC Published reports – sampled for data on well-led. Sample size 177, 50 services with outstanding ratings (all outstanding ratings for well-led when the sample was extracted) for and 127 for services with inadequate ratings for well-led. 16

What does this mean for individuals? “I feel safe, I can live the life

What does this mean for individuals? “I feel safe, I can live the life I want and I am supported to manage any risks” “I have care and support that is directed by me and responsive to my needs” “I am in control of planning my care and support” “I can plan ahead and keep control in a crisis” think local act personal – MAKING IT REAL Marking progress towards personalised, community–based support

‘Outstanding’ can be achieved "We didn't think we were outstanding. And perhaps that's why

‘Outstanding’ can be achieved "We didn't think we were outstanding. And perhaps that's why we were – I think it's because we see every single person as an individual. It is our privilege to support them to live the last years of their life with as much happiness, love and security as we can give them. " Suzanne, Prince of Wales House, Ipswich 18

Prince of Wales House, Ipswich innovative and creative commitment by managers to continually improve

Prince of Wales House, Ipswich innovative and creative commitment by managers to continually improve ‘My Story’ booklets give detailed biography of a person – with the clear message that their lives do not stop when they move into care vibrant and friendly environment staff are motivated by a strong culture of inclusivity care is person-centred considers individuals and their views and preferences management inspire confidence and lead by example strong and visible leadership

Devon care home rated as outstanding in all 5 key questions http: //www. cqc.

Devon care home rated as outstanding in all 5 key questions http: //www. cqc. org. uk/content/cqc-rate-devon-care-homeoutstanding-all-areas OUT “Arcot House Residential Home demonstrated that people were consistently at the heart of the service. People living here were clearly seen as part of an extended family where staff know each person well, recognising their individual interests and what mattered to them. Care was provided by an innovative and committed team who looked after people with the utmost dignity and respect. " 20

Some thoughts to consider……… v. Do I have a trusted critical friend, someone independent

Some thoughts to consider……… v. Do I have a trusted critical friend, someone independent who will tell me the truth abut my service? v. Do I really know what care users think about the care and attention they receive? v. Are my staff really clear about our visions and values? v. Do I have ways in which to encourage and support my staff to try out innovative ideas? v. How do I value and support my staff?

CQC’s ambition Our ambition for the next five years: A more targeted, responsive and

CQC’s ambition Our ambition for the next five years: A more targeted, responsive and collaborative approach to regulation, so more people get high-quality care 22 22

Four priorities to achieve our strategic ambition 1. Encourage improvement, innovation and sustainability in

Four priorities to achieve our strategic ambition 1. Encourage improvement, innovation and sustainability in care 2. Deliver an intelligence-driven approach to regulation 3. Promote a single shared view of quality 4. Improve our efficiency and effectiveness 23

Remember why we do this…… Copyright: Community Care 24

Remember why we do this…… Copyright: Community Care 24