NZAA RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM ON DRIVER INATTENTION DISTRACTION AND

NZAA - RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM ON DRIVER INATTENTION, DISTRACTION AND FATIGUE SEPTEMBER 2011 Leo S Mortimer, Manager Safety, Road & Rail Group - Ministry of Transport

The role of regulation • Various forms of bring about behavioural change • The introduction of the cell phone ban as an example • When do you regulate? • What do you regulate?

Objectives – Mobile phones • The public policy objective is to reduce the risks caused by driver distraction, particularly those related to the use of hand-held communication devices.

Options • Publicity campaign to increase driver awareness • A comprehensive ban on using a mobile phone while driving • Banning the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving • Do nothing

Over this six year period the social cost associated with these crashes is estimated at $187. 9 million Table 1. Crashes where mobile phone communications device was a contributing factor and social cost Year Fatal Total crashes Injury Social cost (2008$, real) 2003 4 46 50 21. 7 m 2004 5 59 64 31. 8 m 2005 7 72 79 42. 5 m 2006 2 93 95 27. 0 m 2007 6 96 102 38. 5 m 2008 1 116 117 26. 6 m

Estimated reduction in social cost of mobile phone related crashes (2008$, real terms) Year 2010 High $9. 1 m Low $7. 6 m 2011 2012 2013 2014 $10. 0 m $10. 9 m $11. 7 m $12. 6 m $7. 6 m

Estimated benefit to cost ratio under different scenarios High benefit Low benefit High cost 1. 7 1. 3 Low cost 3. 3 2. 5

Consultation • 53 submissions discussed the proposal to ban the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving • unanimously (at least in principal) in favour of a ban on the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving. • banning the “use” of hand-held mobile phones would be difficult to enforce. • A number of submitters supported the hands free rather than a total ban • While many others said the use of hands-free mobile phones should also be banned. • prohibit their use would be costly to businesses and the economy,

What was the public saying? • Broad public support for the banning of hand-held mobile phones. • A NZ Automobile Association poll at that time said 76 percent of its members supported a ban on the use of hand-held mobile phones • A recent Research New Zealand poll revealed 86 percent public support for a ban on the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving

Casualties in mobile phone crashes • Casualties in crashes where 'cell phone' was identified as a contributing factor; (prior to late 2009 other 'communications devices' were also included) (hand held devices are not identified separately) (law forbidding use of hand held devices while driving took effect Nov 2009) Year Fatal Serious Minor 2005 10 14 81 2006 2 22 101 2007 8 15 121 2008 1 24 133 2009 5 15 72 2010 5 15 73

Mobile phone crashes – Crash severity • Crashes where ‘mobile phone' was identified as a contributing factor (prior to late 2009 other 'communications devices' were also included) (hand held devices are not identified separately) (national data for causes for non-injury crashes began in 2007) (law forbidding use of hand held devices while driving took effect Nov 2009) Year Fatal Serious Minor Non-injury 2005 7 11 62 2006 2 20 77 2007 6 15 85 223 2008 1 22 96 218 2009 5 13 63 174 2010 5 13 50 129

Questions Leo S Mortimer Manager Safety - Road & Rail Group Ministry of Transport L. mortimer@transport. govt. nz