Nuclear fission with meanfield instantons 1 Instanton method

  • Slides: 35
Download presentation
Nuclear fission with mean-field instantons: 1) Instanton method as the Gamow approach to quantum

Nuclear fission with mean-field instantons: 1) Instanton method as the Gamow approach to quantum tunneling in TDHF. 2) General remarks 3) Various forms of action & equations 4) Variational principle 5) Coordinate and momenta representation 6) Adiabatic limit = ATDHF 7) GCM mass does not respect instanton constraints 8) Inclusion of pairing Conclusions

Gamow method: motion with imaginary momentum. Formally: In general: the stationary phase approximation to

Gamow method: motion with imaginary momentum. Formally: In general: the stationary phase approximation to the path-integral expression for the propagator TD variational principle Decay rate proportional to: with S action for the periodic instanton called bounce.

In field theory: S. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929 In nuclear mean-field

In field theory: S. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929 In nuclear mean-field theory: S. Levit, J. W. Negele and Z. Paltiel, Phys. Rev. C 22 (1980) 1979 Some simple problems solved: G. Puddu and J. W. Negele, Phys. Rev. C 35 (1987) 1007 J. W. Negele, Nucl. Phys. A 502 (1989) 371 c J. A. Freire, D. P. Arrovas and H. Levine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 5054 J. A. Freire and D. P. Arrovas, Phys. Rev. A 59 (1999) 1461 J. Skalski, Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 033626 No connection to other approaches to the Large Amplitude Collective Motion.

The Eq. (1) without the r. h. s. conserves E and The full Eq.

The Eq. (1) without the r. h. s. conserves E and The full Eq. (1) preserves diagonal overlaps, the offdiagonal are equal to zero if they were zero initially. The boundary conditions: This + periodicity: Decay exponent:

To make Eq. (1) local in time one might think of solving it together

To make Eq. (1) local in time one might think of solving it together with: However, this is the equation of inverse diffusion – highly unstable.

There are two sets of Slater determinants: GCM energy kernel on [0, T/2]

There are two sets of Slater determinants: GCM energy kernel on [0, T/2]

It follows from (A) that The drag is necessary and the result of the

It follows from (A) that The drag is necessary and the result of the dragging is fixed. The measure provided by S is the scalar product of the dragging field with the change induced in the dragged one. Thus, one may expect a minimum principle for S that selects the bounce. What is left is to fix the constraints.

Antihermitean part of h = Thouless-Valatin term. Within the density functional method the generic

Antihermitean part of h = Thouless-Valatin term. Within the density functional method the generic contribution to the antihermitean part of h comes from the current j: (note that: and this differs by a factor (-i) with respect to the real-time TDHF). As a result, the related time-odd contribution to the mean field becomes: and appears as soon as the real parts of start to differ.

Definition of a coordinate along the barrier, say Q: in general. Neither Q nor

Definition of a coordinate along the barrier, say Q: in general. Neither Q nor q are sufficient to label instanton: it depends also on velocity; even for the same q (or Q)

Collapse of the attractive BEC of atoms

Collapse of the attractive BEC of atoms

leave S invariant; The equation changes:

leave S invariant; The equation changes:

N invertible,

N invertible,

There are various representations of bounce with different overlaps

There are various representations of bounce with different overlaps

If fulfil equations (A) with If energy is kept constant

If fulfil equations (A) with If energy is kept constant

Since Constraints: Boundary conditions E=const. Fixed overlaps Set (A) of equations. Then S minimal

Since Constraints: Boundary conditions E=const. Fixed overlaps Set (A) of equations. Then S minimal for bounce

Time-even coordinates and time-odd momenta:

Time-even coordinates and time-odd momenta:

Similarity to cranking, but the self-consistency changes a lot.

Similarity to cranking, but the self-consistency changes a lot.

Adiabatic limit: similar to ATDHF (M. J. Giannoni and P. Quentin, Phys. Rev. C

Adiabatic limit: similar to ATDHF (M. J. Giannoni and P. Quentin, Phys. Rev. C 21 (1980) 2060 : but there is no density operator for instanton.

connection with ATDHF

connection with ATDHF

GCM results from energy condition and lack of any dependence on velocity Integrand:

GCM results from energy condition and lack of any dependence on velocity Integrand:

Including pairing:

Including pairing:

Problems: - Finding solution -Odd particle number systems - Phases (? )

Problems: - Finding solution -Odd particle number systems - Phases (? )