Nuclear Fission Through the 1930s higher mass elements

  • Slides: 45
Download presentation
Nuclear Fission • Through the 1930’s higher mass elements could be created by bombarding

Nuclear Fission • Through the 1930’s higher mass elements could be created by bombarding nuclei with neutrons, followed by beta decay • Attempts to create transuranic elements failed, however. Instead, Barium and other lighter elements were identified in the reaction products. • (1939) Meiner and Frisch proposed that Uranium undergoes fission, or splits into fragments, after neutron absorption • Fission represents a competition between nuclear binding and Coulomb repulsion Nuclear Binding ~ A Coulomb Repulsion ~ Z 2 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 1

Binding Energies • Recall the binding energy per nucleon: • A heavy nucleus like

Binding Energies • Recall the binding energy per nucleon: • A heavy nucleus like 238 U has B/A ~ 7. 6 Me. V/nucleon • If 238 U splits into two equal A=119 fragments, then B/A ~8. 5 Me. V/nucleon • This would release DE ~ 214 Me. V in the form of kinetic energy of the fragments • Smaller fragments more energetically favorable 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 2

Characteristics of Fission • Consider the fission of 235 U by thermal (low energy)

Characteristics of Fission • Consider the fission of 235 U by thermal (low energy) neutrons: neutron rich – The fragments are not uniquely determined, but tend to favor unequal sizes • Favored by phase space arguments, both nuclei closer to stability – “Fast” neutrons favor more equal mass fragments 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 3

Prompt and Delayed Neutrons • What if we the 235 U fragments just shared

Prompt and Delayed Neutrons • What if we the 235 U fragments just shared neutrons? – Both nuclei are neutron rich, Z/A ~ 0. 39 • Stable nuclei in this region prefer Z/A ~0. 41 – Fragments tend to shed excess neutrons at the instant of fission – This leads to the emission of prompt neutrons: nucleus <# prompt neutrons> 233 U 2. 48 235 U 2. 42 239 Pu 2. 86 Distribution is approximately Gaussian, consistent with an evaporation process. – Unstable fragments can lead to the emission of delayed neutrons, following b decay • About one per 100 fissions 4

Controlled Fission • The neutrons produced in a fission reaction are fast (few Me.

Controlled Fission • The neutrons produced in a fission reaction are fast (few Me. V) • If we can moderate or slow down the neutrons, then they can initiate additional fission reactions – Slower neutrons have higher capture cross sections – This is the idea behind a controlled chain reaction used in nuclear production • E. Fermi (1942) – Early reactors used carbon as a moderator • Light nucleus, large energy transfer in collision • Interleaved U and C blocks formed a pile (238 U capture resonances) • Neutron Reproduction Factor k: – The change in the number of thermal neutrons from one generation of reactions to the next 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 5

k<1 subcritical k=1 critical k>1 supercritical Controlled Fission Cycle Start 235 U/238 U ~

k<1 subcritical k=1 critical k>1 supercritical Controlled Fission Cycle Start 235 U/238 U ~ 0. 72% captures on moderator f~0. 9 thermal neutrons induce fission in 235 U 238 U resonances in 10 -100 e. V region p~0. 9 h=1. 88 for enriched U 235 U/238 U ~ 3% e~1. 03 10/19/20 21 some neutrons will induce fission in 238 U Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 6

Critical Size • Minimizing the surface area of the pile will minimize neutron leakage

Critical Size • Minimizing the surface area of the pile will minimize neutron leakage • Leakage depends on how far a neutron can travel without being absorbed (called the migration length M) Slow neutron diffusion – For a graphite pile Ls=18. 7 cm, Ld=50. 8 cm Slow down fast neutrons • For a spherical pile can guess • There will be a critical size corresponding to k=1 • For a spherical arrangement this is about RC=5 m 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 7

Timescales and Control • The neutrons are characterized by a time constant t that

Timescales and Control • The neutrons are characterized by a time constant t that involves both moderation (10 -6 s) and absorption (10 -3 s) • If you have N neutrons at t=0, you have k. N at t=t • So if k>1 the number of neutrons will grow exponentially with a timescale of order ms…. • Solution is to use Cd control rods to absorb neutrons – Reactor is subcritical for prompt neutrons – Delayed neutrons (with longer timescale) make it critical 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 8

A Natural Fission Reactor • The natural abundance of 235 U relative to 238

A Natural Fission Reactor • The natural abundance of 235 U relative to 238 U is about 0. 72% – Moon rocks show same abundance • Oklo mine (Gabon, Africa) shows an unusually low abundance of 235 U (3 s below the mean), some places as low as 0. 44%! – No known chemical process should change the natural ratio like this • About 2 x 109 years ago, the natural abundance of 235 U relative to 238 U was about 3% – A “natural” fission reactor could have operated, using groundwater as a moderator – Low power (0. 01 MW) or it would boil away the groundwater – Burned for about 106 years – Consumed about 5 tons of 235 U 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 9

Oklo Mine - Isotopic Abundances • Isotopic abundances of fission fragments consistent with 235

Oklo Mine - Isotopic Abundances • Isotopic abundances of fission fragments consistent with 235 U fission! • Now that’s “green energy”! 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 10

Fission Reactor Technology (I) • Classify fission reactors by MODERATOR – Graphite moderated •

Fission Reactor Technology (I) • Classify fission reactors by MODERATOR – Graphite moderated • Older design, safety issues (Chernobyl) – Heavy water (D 20) moderated • Can use unenriched Uranium – Bypass international restrictions on enriching Uranium – Produce more Pu as a byproduct – Light water moderated • Require enriched Uranium • Negative feedback stabilizes reactor – Density of water falls as temperature increases – Molten Salt Reactors (Li, Be) • Very compact design (aircraft) • Simple design, low pressure – Liquid Metal (fast reactors, unmoderated) 10/19/20 21 • Soviet nuclear submarines (Alfa class) Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 11

Fission Reactor Technology (II) • Classify fission reactors by COOLING: – Pressurized Water •

Fission Reactor Technology (II) • Classify fission reactors by COOLING: – Pressurized Water • Coolant kept under pressure to keep it from boiling – Three Mile Island was this type – Boiling Water • Coolant is allowed to boil, steam pressure used to regulate – Pool Type – Liquid Metal • Fast reactors (no moderator) • Na, Pb-Bi, etc – Gas Cooled (He, N, CO 2, …) – Molten Salt (Li. F, Be. F 2) 10/19/20 21 • Fuel dissolved in coolant Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 12

Nuclear Fuel • Uranium and Plutonium are used in a variety of forms as

Nuclear Fuel • Uranium and Plutonium are used in a variety of forms as a nuclear fuel – Uranium Oxide • Enrichment varies – MOX Fuel • Mixture of Pu and depleted U • Alternative to LEU for LWR’s • Used by England, France and Russia, India, Japan to a lesser extent • China plans fast breeders with reprocessing – Molten Salts – TRISO • Pebble-bed reactors 10/19/20 21 C Si. C UO Physics 590 B - Fall. X 2014 13

Uranium Enrichment • Mined Uranium ore is refined and converted to UF 6 –

Uranium Enrichment • Mined Uranium ore is refined and converted to UF 6 – USA, France, UK, Russia, Iran(? ) – Highly dangerous and corrosive, shipped as a solid crystal – UF 6 gas can be 235 U enriched by diffusion or centrifuge – Back to UO 2 (pellets) 235 U 238 U Zippe centrifuge 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 14

Breeder Reactors “Breeder” fission reactors can essentially create their own fuel from an initial

Breeder Reactors “Breeder” fission reactors can essentially create their own fuel from an initial fuel charge and 238 U. Refueling involves reprocessing and adding a new charge of 238 U 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 15

Nuclear Waste • 99% of the radioactive waste is in the nuclear fuel rods

Nuclear Waste • 99% of the radioactive waste is in the nuclear fuel rods • Stored locally in pools of boric acid Dry Cask Storage – Can’t store too much together or they might go critical! • Overcrowding of pools has led to “dry cask” storage – Rods moved after ~5 yrs in cooling pond – Also stored on site • Currently no permanent solution to waste storage 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 16

Yucca Mountain Geologically stable for ~10 k years (expected) Underground storage facility constructed by

Yucca Mountain Geologically stable for ~10 k years (expected) Underground storage facility constructed by tunnel boring into the mountain. 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 17

Dumped Reactors (USSR) 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 18

Dumped Reactors (USSR) 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 18

Chernobyl • 26 April 1986: • Explosion and fire in reactor #4 at Chernobyl

Chernobyl • 26 April 1986: • Explosion and fire in reactor #4 at Chernobyl nuclear facility near Pripyat, Ukraine • 400 times more fallout that Hiroshima • Catastrophic power excursion caused steam explosion • Ironically caused by a failed safety test prior to shutdown for refueling 10/19/20 21 radiation shield and containment building steam separator control rods steam cooling water RMB-1000 Nuclear Reactor Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 19

Modern Reactor Designs • Passive Protection – designed with negative feedback to keep system

Modern Reactor Designs • Passive Protection – designed with negative feedback to keep system stable – No diesel generators required in event of power failure – Can operate for long period of time without human intervention – Passive circulation relies on gravity (not pumps) Westinghouse AP 1000 approved by NRC in 2005. Units in China already under constrcution, planned operation in 2013 -15. Fourteen applications for operating licenses 10/19/20 Physics 590 B pending in US. (Georgia plant loan guarantees) 21 - Fall 2014 20

Fission Explosives • Nuclear weapons require much more highly enriched Uranium – Need energy

Fission Explosives • Nuclear weapons require much more highly enriched Uranium – Need energy release from a supercritical mass faster than the mass is blown apart – A crude device could be built with ~20% 235 U, “modern” weapons use >85% • Collect subcritical pieces into a critical assembly Frank Spedding 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall Harley Wilhelm ~2 M lbs of pure Uranium 1942 -45 21 2014

Fission Weapon Designs ~20 k. T TNT ea. , ~1 kg of material consumed

Fission Weapon Designs ~20 k. T TNT ea. , ~1 kg of material consumed “Little Boy” (Hiroshima) “Fast” Explosive “Fat Man” (Nagasaki) “Slow” Explosive Tamper/Pusher Shockwave Neutron Initiator 10/19/20 21 Pu core Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 22

Fusion • Instead of splitting large nuclei, what if we combine light elements •

Fusion • Instead of splitting large nuclei, what if we combine light elements • Fusion has many key advantages over fission: – Light nuclei (p, d, t) easy to obtain – End products light and stable • However, in order to get nuclei to fuse you have to overcome the Coulomb barrier between them. 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 23

Coulomb Repulsion (Again!) • Consider: (Q = 20. 7 Me. V) – Using the

Coulomb Repulsion (Again!) • Consider: (Q = 20. 7 Me. V) – Using the “two spheres touching” model: – So if we collide a beam of 20 Ne on a 20 Ne target at 21. 2 Me. V we would get back – Almost double our investment! – Why doesn’t this work as a power source? • Doesn’t take inefficiencies into account • High intensity beams difficult to produce • At best you could get a few Watts… 10/19/20 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 21 24

Thermonuclear Fusion • What if you were to heat a container of 20 Ne

Thermonuclear Fusion • What if you were to heat a container of 20 Ne to an average kinetic energy of 21. 2 Me. V – Obtain a much higher particle density! – We want: – As a rule of thumb, at room temp. k. BT ~ 1/40 e. V – For 20 Ne, TF ~ 1011 K • Core temperature of our sun ~107 K – This will be difficult! • Still, if you want to compete with commercial fission reactors at ~1 GW, this is what you have to do • Must be a good idea, the stars do it… 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 25

Basic Fusion Processes (I) • The most basic fusion process we can think of

Basic Fusion Processes (I) • The most basic fusion process we can think of is: – Not possible! 2 He is unstable… • A possible reaction is: (Q=1. 44 Me. V) – Requires the weak interaction to come into play – This reaction will be rate limiting! • Also possible: (Q=23. 8 Me. V) – 4 He excited state high in energy, so photon necessary for energy balance – Q is greater than the n, p separation energy for 4 He – This reaction is unlikely 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 26

Basic Fusion Processes (II) • More likely deuterium reactions are: (Q=3. 3 Me. V)

Basic Fusion Processes (II) • More likely deuterium reactions are: (Q=3. 3 Me. V) (Q=4. 0 Me. V) • d-t reactions are also possible: (Q=17. 6 Me. V) – Large energy release, good candidate for energy production – Have to overcome barrier of: – Don’t need to overcome this, just come close so the tunneling probability is appreciable. 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 27

Kinematics • If the initial kinetic energy is low compared to the Q value,

Kinematics • If the initial kinetic energy is low compared to the Q value, so we can write: The lightest particle will carry away most of the Q-value! • For the d-t reaction, <En> ~ 14. 1 Me. V – This energy can be difficult to extract 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 28

Fusion Cross Sections • For particles interacting at thermal energies, the reaction will most

Fusion Cross Sections • For particles interacting at thermal energies, the reaction will most likely occur away from any resonances • The basic fusion cross section can be written as: v = relative velocity – Where G is the same Gamow factor we encountered in a decay – For Ek << VB we can approximate: – The proportionality factor will account for statistical factors, spins, etc. 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 29

Fusion Rates (I) • The rate a reaction will proceed at depends on the

Fusion Rates (I) • The rate a reaction will proceed at depends on the cross section: rel. velocity (cm s-1) No. of target atoms Intensity (s-1 cm-2) density (cm-3) – Just rewriting what we had before… • For a thermal collection of matter, the velocities will be distributed according to a Maxwell-Boltzmann factor: • So the relevant quantity is thermal averaged cross section: 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 30

Fusion Rates (II) • The fusion rate for a process will depend on the

Fusion Rates (II) • The fusion rate for a process will depend on the interplay between the cross section and the Maxwell. Boltzmann distribution – MB peaked low – sv grows for higher energies (For asymmetric distributions and s as a function of vrel) 10/19/20 systems we need two Boltzmann Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 21 31

Fusion Rates (III) 107 K 10/19/20 21 108 K Physics 590 B - Fall

Fusion Rates (III) 107 K 10/19/20 21 108 K Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 32

Solar Fusion (I) • We could learn a lot from the sun… • The

Solar Fusion (I) • We could learn a lot from the sun… • The proton-proton cycle is the primary process by which the sun produces energy: (Q=1. 44 Me. V) – Bottleneck for the whole process: – At T~1. 5 x 107 K in the core of the sun, k. BT~1 ke. V – The Boltzmann tail helps you reach higher energies where the cross section is larger – Reaction rate about 1038/s in the sun • Next step: – 2 H+2 H 10/19/20 21 (Q=5. 49 Me. V) unlikely at this point, concentration of 2 H too low • D/H < 10 -5 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 33

Solar Fusion (II) • Next step: (4 Li not stable – no help!) (very

Solar Fusion (II) • Next step: (4 Li not stable – no help!) (very rare, “hep” neutrinos) • Instead: (Q=12. 86 Me. V) (pp I) • The net result of these interactions is: (Q=26. 7 Me. V) • Other reactions are possible: monoenergetic neutrinos! (pp II) (pp III) (same final state, same Q value) 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 34

The C-N-O Cycle • The presence of 12 C in the stellar interior can

The C-N-O Cycle • The presence of 12 C in the stellar interior can act as a catalyst to fusion: No deuterium bottleneck! However, the Coulomb barrier is 6 -7 times higher This process dominates at higher T. • All of these reactions produce neutrinos, which immediately escape the sun… 10/19/20 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 21 35

Solar Neutrinos Ray Davies (1964) – deficit of neutrinos from inverse beta process Kamiokande,

Solar Neutrinos Ray Davies (1964) – deficit of neutrinos from inverse beta process Kamiokande, Gallex, SAGE, etc (80’s-90’s): confirm deficit SNO (2001) – not all neutrinos are electron neutrinos when they reach Earth!! Kamland – verified neutrino oscillations theory. 10/19/20 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 21 36

Neutrino Oscillations • The neutrino flavor eigenstates are not the same as the mass

Neutrino Oscillations • The neutrino flavor eigenstates are not the same as the mass eigenstates: (E=1 Ge. V, Dm 2=0. 005 e. V 2) • Neutrinos born as ne can be detected as nm 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 37

Fusion Power Magnetic Confinement: Tokamak “Mirror” Inertial Confinement: Atmos. Formation 10/19/20 21 Compression Ignition

Fusion Power Magnetic Confinement: Tokamak “Mirror” Inertial Confinement: Atmos. Formation 10/19/20 21 Compression Ignition Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 Burn 38

ITER 24 m Vacuum Vessel Magnet System Blanket 30 m Divertor R=6. 2 m

ITER 24 m Vacuum Vessel Magnet System Blanket 30 m Divertor R=6. 2 m Ip=15 MA Pfus=500 MW 10/19/20 21 Person Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 39

Thermonuclear Weapons • Essentially a daisy-chain of a fission and fusion bomb: primary fires

Thermonuclear Weapons • Essentially a daisy-chain of a fission and fusion bomb: primary fires Plasma ignites 235 U sparkplug fission bomb fusion fuel: 238 U, Li. D, 235 U X-rays reflect into Li. D fission fuel casing (polystytrene) 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 Li converted to 3 H, fusion begins, tamper fissions 40

BACKUP 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 41

BACKUP 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 41

Fission Lifetimes • If it is energetically favorable, why don’t nuclei spontaneously fall apart?

Fission Lifetimes • If it is energetically favorable, why don’t nuclei spontaneously fall apart? – For 238 U, t 1/2 = 4. 5 x 109 years for a decay, but 1016 years for fission! • The Coulomb barrier inhibits fission in much the same way as for a decay – Barrier height for 238 U decay to 119 Pd estimate: – The 214 Me. V energy release makes many final states available, however the barrier height makes tunneling unlikely! 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 42

Spontaneous vs. Induced Fission • Classify fission processes according to the barrier height: •

Spontaneous vs. Induced Fission • Classify fission processes according to the barrier height: • Spontaneous Fission – If DE ~ Coulomb, fission will compete with other decay processes. This is not observed for naturally occurring nuclei, but becomes important around A~300 • Induced Fission – If DE < Coulomb, fission can be induced by the absorption of a neutron or gamma ray – Activation Energy is the height of the fission barrier above the ground state 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 43

Activation Energy (I) • The liquid-drop model can predict the average behavior – Of

Activation Energy (I) • The liquid-drop model can predict the average behavior – Of course, shell effects will modify this – Get a quantitative feel for the fission process – Stretch a nucleus, keeping the volume constant b a – As the nucleus is stretched, the surface area changes: – The dominant change in the binding energy comes from the surface area and Coulomb terms: 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 44

Activation Energy (II) • If the second term dominates the first term, we gain

Activation Energy (II) • If the second term dominates the first term, we gain energy and the nucleus will be unstable spontaneous fission condition 10/19/20 21 Physics 590 B - Fall 2014 45