November 2004 doc IEEE 802 15 04 0483
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Project: IEEE P 802. 15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPAN’s) Submission Title: [Detailed DS-UWB simulation results] Date Submitted: [November, 2004] Source: [Michael Mc Laughlin] Company [deca. Wave Ltd] Address [25 Meadowfield, Dublin, Ireland] Voice: [+353 -1 -295 -4937], E-Mail: [michael@decawave. com] Re: Abstract: [Presents detailed simulation results for the DS-UWB TG 3 a PHY proposal] Purpose: [Provide technical information to the TG 3 a voters regarding PHY proposals. ] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P 802. 15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P 802. 15. Submission 1 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Simulation Overview • AWGN and channel models CM 1 to CM 4 • Bit rates range from 9 Mbps to 2. 0 Gbps • Fully impaired Monte Carlo Simulation – rake coefficients quantized to 3 -bits – 3 -bit A to D converter (I and Q channels) – RRC pulse shaping – DFE trained in < 5 s in noisy channel (for bitrates >55 Mbps) – Front-end filter for Tx/Rx + 6. 6 d. B Noise Figure – Packet loss due to acquisition failure Submission 2 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Simulation parameters • Matched filter – 16 rake taps for 110 Mbps and greater – Usually 8 rake taps for rates below 110 Mbps – Low complexity simulations of 2 rake taps at 9 Mbps • k=6 convolutional code (k=4 for ≥ 1 Gbps) • Equalizer – 31 Tap DFE for 110 Mbps and greater – No DFE used for rates below 110 Mbps Submission 3 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Low Band Range for 110 and 220 Mbps Submission 4 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Low Band Range for 110 and 220 Mbps Submission 5 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 90% Outage Comparison Mandatory Rates Submission 6 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Range for 500 and 660 Mbps Submission 7 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Range for 500 and 660 Mbps Submission 8 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 90% Outage Comparison High Rates Submission 9 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 High Band Performance Submission 10 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 DS-UWB Operating Bands Low Band 3 4 5 6 7 8 High Band 9 10 11 GHz 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 GHz • Each piconet operates in one of two bands – Low band (below U-NII, 3. 1 to 4. 9 GHz) – Mandatory – High band (optional, above U-NII, 6. 2 to 9. 7 GHz) – Optional • Different “personalities”: propagation & bandwidth • Both have ~ 50% fractional bandwidth Submission 11 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 What high band performance is expected? • Centre frequency is twice as high => lose 6 d. B. • 2 x Bandwidth => 2 x Total power => gain 3 d. B • Expect overall loss of 3 d. B w. r. t. low band in AWGN. • 3 d. B loss equates to a range factor ~70% • Simulations show AWGN range for 220 Mbps is 16. 5 m in low band 11. 7 m AWGN in high band. • Although there is a loss of 3 d. B in AWGN, the loss turns out to be less in Multipath because of the greater frequency diversity and, in some cases, stronger FEC. Submission 12 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN for high band 220 Mbps & 440 Mbps Submission 13 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN for high band 500 Mbps & 660 Mbps Submission 14 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 and CM 2 range for high band 220 Mbps Submission 15 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 3 and CM 4 range for high band 220 Mbps Submission 16 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for high band 440 Mbps Submission 17 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 and CM 2 range for high band 660 Mbps Submission 18 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Ultra High Rates: 1 Gbps, 1. 33 and 2. 0 Gbps Submission 19 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for low band 1000 Mbps & 1330 Mbps Submission 20 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for low band 1330 Mbps Submission 21 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN for high band 1 Gbps & 1. 3 Gbps Submission 22 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN for high band 2 Gbps Submission 23 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for low band 1000 Mbps Submission 24 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for low band 1000 Mbps: 85% outage Submission 25 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for 1 Gbps: 80% outage Submission 26 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for 1 Gbps: 70% outage Submission 27 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 and CM 2 range for high band 1000 Mbps Submission 28 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 and CM 2 range for high band 1320 Mbps Submission 29 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for high band 2000 Mbps Submission 30 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range comparison Submission 31 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Multipath range comparison mean range Submission 32 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Multipath range comparison 90% outage Submission 33 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Backup Slides: the following slides contain graphs of the data from which the ranges for the various bit rates were obtained Submission 34 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Awgn Range for 110 Mbps Submission 35 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 Range for 110 Mbps Submission 36 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 2 Range for 110 Mbps Submission 37 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 3 Range for 110 Mbps Submission 38 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 4 Range for 110 Mbps Submission 39 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for 220 Mbps Submission 40 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for 220 Mbps Submission 41 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 2 range for 220 Mbps Submission 42 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 3 range for 220 Mbps Submission 43 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 4 range for 220 Mbps Submission 44 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for 330 Mbps Submission 45 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for 330 Mbps Submission 46 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 2 range for 330 Mbps Submission 47 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for 663 Mbps with no coding Submission 48 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for 1 Gbps Submission 49 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for 500 Mbps Submission 50 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for 500 Mbps Submission 51 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 2 range for 500 Mbps Submission 52 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for 660 Mbps with coding Submission 53 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for 660 Mbps Submission 54 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 2 range for 660 Mbps Submission 55 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Miscellaneous Rates: Submission 56 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 660 Mbps – No Coding Submission 57 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 660 Mbps – No Coding Submission 58 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 660 Mbps – No Coding, 70% outage Submission 59 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 660 Mbps – No Coding. 60% outage Submission 60 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Miscellaneous Modes Submission 61 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Common Signaling Mode Performance Submission 62 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Range for CSM modes Submission 63 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Range for CSM modes Submission 64 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for CSM at 9 Mbps (Note: 1. 9 d. B reduced Tx level at 9 Mbps to allow for spectral ripple) Submission 65 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for CSM at 9 Mbps Submission 66 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 2 range for CSM at 9 Mbps Submission 67 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 3 range for CSM at 9 Mbps Submission 68 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Low complexity (2 rake taps) CSM at 9 Mbps over CM 1 Submission 69 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Low complexity (2 rake taps) CSM at 9 Mbps over CM 2 Submission 70 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 AWGN range for CSM at 110 Mbps Submission 71 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 1 range for CSM at 110 Mbps Submission 72 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 2 range for CSM at 110 Mbps Submission 73 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 CM 3 range for CSM at 110 Mbps Submission 74 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
November 2004 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -04 -0483 r 4 Ultra High Rates in Low band Submission 75 Michael Mc Laughlin, deca. Wave
- Slides: 75