Nov 2011 doc IEEE 802 11 11 1531

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 TGac MAC ad hoc agenda and report Date: 2011 -11 -10 Authors: Submission Slide 1 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Abstract • Agenda, Pre-Motions and Straw Polls for the TGac MAC ad hoc group, for Nov 2011 interim meeting held in Atlanta, GA. Submission Slide 2 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Important IEEE Links • The following slides in this deck are believed to be the latest available however the Source locations are: • http: //standards. ieee. org/faqs/affiliation. FAQ. html • http: //standards. ieee. org/resources/antitrust-guidelines. pdf • http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-slideset. ppt • http: //www. ieee. org/portal/cms_docs/about/Co. E_poster. pdf • For summary see 11 -07 -0660 -01 -0000 -opening-presentation Submission Slide 3 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Member Affiliation • It is defined in the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws, 5. 2. 1. 5 as: “An individual is deemed “affiliated” with any individual or entity that has been, or will be, financially or materially supporting that individual’s participation in a particular IEEE standards activity. This includes, but is not limited to, his or her employer and any individual or entity that has or will have, either directly or indirectly, requested, paid for, or otherwise sponsored his or her participation. • http: //standards. ieee. org/faqs/affiliation. FAQ. html Submission Slide 4 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Declaration of Affiliation • Revision: May 2007 Standards Board Bylaw 5. 2. 1. 1 – 5. 2. 1. 1 Openness • Openness is defined as the quality of being not restricted to a particular type or category of participants. All meetings involving standards development an all IEEE Sponsor ballots shall be open toa all interested parties. Each individual participant in IEEE Standards activities shall disclose his or her affiliations when requested. A person who knows or reasonably should know, that a participant’s disclosure is materially incomplete or incorrect should report that fact to the Secretary of the IEEE-SA Standards Board and the appropriate Sponsors. – http: //standards. ieee. org/faqs/affiliation. FAQ. html Submission Slide 5 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Affiliation Policy • Requirement to declare affiliation at all standards development meetings and recorded in the minutes – Affiliation not necessarily same as employer – Declaration requirement may be familiar to some 802 WGs, though WG declaration process may evolve • 11. What if I refuse to disclose my affiliation? – As outlined in IEEE-SA governance documents, you will lose certain rights. In a working group where voting rights are gained through attendance, no attendance credit will be granted if affiliation isn’t declared. Similarly, voting rights are to be removed if affiliation isn’t declared. • Affiliation declaration will be added to Sponsor ballot • http: //standards. ieee. org/faqs/affiliation. FAQ. html Submission Slide 6 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Highlights of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards – Participants have a duty to tell the IEEE if they know (based on personal awareness) of potentially Essential Patent Claims they or their employer own – Participants are encouraged to tell the IEEE if they know of potentially Essential Patent Claims owned by others • This encouragement is particularly strong as the third party may not be a participant in the standards process – Working Group required to request assurance – Early assurance is encouraged – Terms of assurance shall be either: • Reasonable and nondiscriminatory, with or without monetary compensation; or, • A statement of non-assertion of patent rights – Assurances • • Shall be provided on the IEEE-SA Standards Board approved LOA form May optionally include not-to-exceed rates, terms, and conditions Shall not be circumvented through sale or transfer of patents Shall be brought to the attention of any future assignees or transferees Shall apply to Affiliates unless explicitly excluded Are irrevocable once submitted and accepted Shall be supplemented if Submitter becomes aware of other potential Essential Patent Claims – A “Blanket Letter of Assurance” may be provided at the option of the patent holder – A patent holder has no duty to perform a patent search – Full policy available at http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/bylaws/sect 6 -7. html#6 Submission Slide 7 Fischer, Lee, Zhu 1

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards 6. 2 Policy IEEE standards may be drafted in terms that include the use of Essential Patent Claims. If the IEEE receives notice that a [Proposed] IEEE Standard may require the use of a potential Essential Patent Claim, the IEEE shall request licensing assurance, on the IEEE Standards Board approved Letter of Assurance form, from the patent holder or patent applicant. The IEEE shall request this assurance without coercion. The Submitter of the Letter of Assurance may, after Reasonable and Good Faith Inquiry, indicate it is not aware of any Patent Claims that the Submitter may own, control, or have the ability to license that might be or become Essential Patent Claims. If the patent holder or patent applicant provides an assurance, it should do so as soon as reasonably feasible in the standards development process. This assurance shall be provided prior to the Standards Board’s approval of the standard. This assurance shall be provided prior to a reaffirmation if the IEEE receives notice of a potential Essential Patent Claim after the standard’s approval or a prior reaffirmation. An asserted potential Essential Patent Claim for which an assurance cannot be obtained (e. g. , a Letter of Assurance is not provided or the Letter of Assurance indicates that assurance is not being provided) shall be referred to the Patent Committee. A Letter of Assurance shall be either: a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the Submitter without conditions will not enforce any present or future Essential Patent Claims against any person or entity making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing, distributing, or implementing a compliant implementation of the standard; or b) A statement that a license for a compliant implementation of the standard will be made available to an unrestricted number of applicants on a worldwide basis without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination. At its sole option, the Submitter may provide with its assurance any of the following: (i) a not-to-exceed license fee or rate commitment, (ii) a sample license agreement, or (iii) one or more material licensing terms. Submission Slide 8 Fischer, Lee, Zhu 2

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards Copies of an Accepted LOA may be provided to the working group, but shall not be discussed, at any standards working group meeting. The Submitter and all Affiliates (other than those Affiliates excluded in a Letter of Assurance) shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights in any Essential Patent Claims that are the subject of such Letter of Assurance that they hold, control, or have the ability to license with the intent of circumventing or negating any of the representations and commitments made in such Letter of Assurance. The Submitter of a Letter of Assurance shall agree (a) to provide notice of a Letter of Assurance either through a Statement of Encumbrance or by binding any assignee or transferee to the terms of such Letter of Assurance; and (b) to require its assignee or transferee to (i) agree to similarly provide such notice and (ii) to bind its assignees or transferees to agree to provide such notice as described in (a) and (b). This assurance shall apply to the Submitter and its Affiliates except those Affiliates the Submitter specifically excludes on the relevant Letter of Assurance. If, after providing a Letter of Assurance to the IEEE, the Submitter becomes aware of additional Patent Claim(s) not already covered by an existing Letter of Assurance that are owned, controlled, or licensable by the Submitter that may be or become Essential Patent Claim(s) for the same IEEE Standard but are not the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, then such Submitter shall submit a Letter of Assurance stating its position regarding enforcement or licensing of such Patent Claims. For the purposes of this commitment, the Submitter is deemed to be aware if any of the following individuals who are from, employed by, or otherwise represent the Submitter have personal knowledge of additional potential Essential Patent Claims, owned or controlled by the Submitter, related to a [Proposed] IEEE Standard and not already the subject of a previously submitted Letter of Assurance: (a) past or present participants in the development of the [Proposed] IEEE Standard, or (b) the individual executing the previously submitted Letter of Assurance. Submission Slide 9 Fischer, Lee, Zhu 3

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards The assurance is irrevocable once submitted and accepted and shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal. The IEEE is not responsible for identifying Essential Patent Claims for which a license may be required, for conducting inquiries into the legal validity or scope of those Patent Claims, or for determining whether any licensing terms or conditions are reasonable or non-discriminatory. Nothing in this policy shall be interpreted as giving rise to a duty to conduct a patent search. No license is implied by the submission of a Letter of Assurance. In order for IEEE’s patent policy to function efficiently, individuals participating in the standards development process: (a) shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of the holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware and that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents; and (b) should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance. 4 Submission Slide 10 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. – Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss fixing product prices, allocation of customers, or dividing sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object. -------------------------------- If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee. org or visit http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat/index. html See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5. 3. 10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. This slide set is available at http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-slideset. ppt Submission Slide 11 5 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Question • Are there any patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that the participant believes may be essential for the use of that standard? • Minute any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. Submission Slide 12 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Current MAC adhoc meeting agenda-notes pages Most recent agenda-notes pages are at the top of this document (i. e. have lower slide numbers). Submission Slide 13 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Interpretive guide • Text coloring: – – Submission Black = pending agenda item Red = item partially addressed Green = item completed Gray = item not addressed in the session indicated at the top of the slide Slide 14 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Agenda for Nov 07 th, 2011 – PM 1 • Affiliation policy – • IEEE Patent policy review – • Power saving Capability negotiations Frame formats Submissions – • 11 -09 -0059 r 5 MAC topics (11 -09 -1175 -01 -00 ac-ad-hoc-groups-scope. ppt) – – – • 11 -11 -1290 r 3 Review rules for adhocs – • Conf call attendance required – send email to chairs Minutes – review – • Reviewed by TGac chair during opening block (must be done within conf calls) Attendance recording – • Reviewed by TGac chair during opening block (must be done within conf calls) Question of IP claims (See slide 12) – • Reviewed by TGac chair during opening block (must be done within conf calls) (see next page) Conference calls – Submission To be decided by the TG Slide 15 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 MAC Pending Comments (Total: 0) • Jae Seung (13): 2150, 2718, 3128, 2149, 2550, 3695, 3541, 2606, 2554, 3376, 3092, 3093, 2915 • Sandhya (3): 3578, 2110, 2288 • Mark (2): 2874, 3364 • Reza (1): 2551 • Peter (2): 3552, 3340 • Matt (13): 3554, 3094, 2182, 2719, 2990, 3040, 2326, 3041, 3352, 3111, 3110, 3113, 3112 • Yongho (2): 2943, 3553 (transferred from COEX) • David (1): 2109 • Sandhya (1): 2542 Submission Slide 16 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Submissions • Monday – 11/1519, Jason (3376, 3092, 3093 , 2915) • Tuesday – – – – – Submission 11/1520, Jason (2150, 2718, 3128, 2149, 2550, 3695, 3541, 2606, and 2554) 11/1041 r 1, Mark (2874 and 3364) 11/1534 r 1, Reza (2551) 11/1020 r 6, Reza (3091) (database updated by the editor) 11/1538 r 0, Sandhya (2110, 3578 and 2288) 11/1543 r 0, Illsoo (non-comment-resolution, but affects Peter’s CIDs related to power constrain element) 11/1448 r 4, Peter (3552, 3340) 11/1528 r 1, Tianyu (3739, 3743) (withdrawn) 11/1552, Matt (3554, 3094, 2182, 2719, 2990, 3040, 2326, 3041, 3352, 3111, 3110, 3113, 3112) 11/xxxx, Yongho (3553, 2943(transfered from COEX)) Slide 17 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

Nov 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Submissions (cont. ) • Wednesday – 11/1553 r 2, David (2109) (discussion continues on Wed, PM 1) – 11/1557 r 1, Sandhya (2542) – 11/1518 r 0, Mark (revisit of previously passed motions) • 3345 owned by the editor since July 25 th (2855 is duplicate of 3345) • 3253 has been resolved by PHY (on 09/20 in 1208 r 4, currently owned by the editor) (3798 is duplicate of 3253) – 11/5566 r 1, Reza (revisit of previously passed motions) • 3398 was originally resolved in 11 -11/1216 r 3 (database updated by the editor) • Thursday – – Submission 11/1518 r 3, Mark (continue from Wed discussion) 11/1477 r 3, Mark (revisit of previously passed motions) 11/1391 r 3, Mark (CID 3351 was withdrawn) 11/1387 r 4, Mark (revisit of previously passed motions) Slide 18 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 TGac MAC adhoc Motions to be brought for vote in TGac task group All MAC adhoc motions are contained in this section, with the most recent motions appearing first. Submission Slide 19 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #1 (PM 1, Mon, 11/07/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolutions to CIDs 2915, 3376, 3092, and 3093, as described in Doc # 1111/1519 r 1? • Yes • No • Abs • Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 20 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #2 (AM 1, Tue, 11/08/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolutions to CIDs 2150, 3128, 2149, 2550, 2554, 3695, 3541, 2606 and 2718 described in Doc # 11 -11/1520 r 2? • Yes • No • Abs • Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 21 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #3 (AM 1, Tue, 11/08/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolutions to CIDs 2874 and 3364 as described in Doc # 11 -11/1041 r 2? • • Yes No Abs Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 22 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #4 (AM 2, Tue, 11/08/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolutions to CID 2551 as described in Doc # 11 -11/1534 r 1? • • Yes No Abs Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 23 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #5 (AM 2, Tue, 11/08/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolutions to CIDs 2955 and 3091 as described in Doc # 11 -11/1020 r 6? • Yes • No • Abs • Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 24 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #6 (PM 1, Tue, 11/08/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolutions to CIDs 2110, 3578 and 2288, as described in Doc # 11 -11/1538 r 1? • • Yes No Abs Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 25 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #7 (PM 1, Tue, 11/08/2011) • Do you agree to accept the editing instructions on text changes related to power constrain element and extended power constrain element as proposed in Doc # 11 -11/1543 r 1? • • Yes No Abs Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 26 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #8 (PM 2, Tue, 11/08/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolutions to CIDs 3552 and 3340, as described in Doc # 11 -11/1448 r 4? • • Yes No Abs Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 27 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #9 (PM 3, Tue, 11/08/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolutions to CIDs 3554, 3094, 2182, 2719, 2990, 3040, 2326, 3041, 3352, 3111, 3110, 3113, and 3112, as described in Doc # 1111/1552 r 1? • • Yes No Abs Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 28 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #10 (PM 3, Tue, 11/08/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolutions to CIDs 2943 and 3553, as described in Doc # 11 -11/1555 r 0? • • Yes No Abs Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 29 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #11 (PM 1, Wed, 11/09/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolution to CID 2109 as described in Doc # 11 -11/1553 r 2? • • Yes No Abs Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 30 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #12 (PM 1, Wed, 11/09/2011) • Do you agree to accept the resolution to CID 2542 as described in Doc # 11 -11/1557 r 1? • Yes • No • Abs • Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 31 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #13 (PM 1, Wed, 11/09/2011) • Do you agree to accept the revised resolution to CID 3398 as described in Doc # 11 -11/1566 r 1? • Yes • No • Abs • Pre-motion passed without objections. Submission Slide 32 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #14 (AM 2, Thu, 11/10/2011) • Do you agree to accept the revised resolutions to CIDs 2855, 3253, 3345 and 3798, under Change Set #1, as described in Doc # 11 -11/1518 r 3? • • Yes: 19 No: 0 Abs: 1 Pre-motion passes Submission Slide 33 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #15 (AM 2, Thu, 11/10/2011) • Do you agree to accept the revised resolutions to CIDs 2855, 3253, 3345 and 3798, under Change Set #2, as described in Doc # 11 -11/1518 r 3? • • Yes: 3 No: 10 Abs: 8 Pre-motion fails Submission Slide 34 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #16 (AM 2, Thu, 11/10/2011) • Do you agree to accept the revised resolution to CID 3351, as described in Doc # 11 -11/1477 r 3? • • Yes: 2 No: 14 Abs: 8 Pre-motion fails Submission Slide 35 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 Pre-Motion #17 (AM 2, Thu, 11/10/2011) • Do you agree to accept the revised resolution to CIDs 2157 and 2158, as described in Doc # 11 -11/1387 r 4? • Yes: 11 • No: 3 • Abs: 10 • Pre-motion passes. Submission Slide 36 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 MAC adhoc operating rules • • • SEE 11 -09 -0059 r 5 Attendance recorded outside of the 802. 11 meeting week if the meeting is adhoc-only Straw poll outcomes will be recorded – • • • Email concerning TGac MAC adhoc will be sent to the TGac reflector with the subject beginning with MAC ADHOC (or MAC Adhoc) >=75% straw poll result is required to forward an item to the task group for a binding motion vote >50% straw poll result is required to move an issue from the MAC adhoc to the task group for further debate – • • Only after at least one failed MAC adhoc vote to forward an item to the task group for a binding motion vote >50% straw poll result is required to move an issue from the MAC adhoc to another adhoc for further debate >50% straw poll result required to refuse an issue that is being moved from another adhoc into the group – • In particular, for straw poll votes to bring an issue to the task group, such as the resolution of an issue, or the failure to resolve an issue Issues forwarded from TGac cannot be refused, must be subject to one failed MAC adhoc vote to forward an item to the task group for a binding motion vote before an attempt to move the item again (See 11 -09 -0059 -05 -00 ac-802 -11 ac-proposed-selection-procedure. doc) Submission Slide 37 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 TE TGac MAC adhoc Nov 19, 2009 minutes PL A • IEEE patent policy discussed, no one asked for a reading • In response to the question of essential claims (see slide 12), no response was elicited • Attendance TE M – Matthew Fischer, Broadcom • Reviewed submission: • Straw polls: Submission Slide 38 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 TE TGac MAC straw poll 100119_a – Topic PL A • Background • Relevant documents 11 -08 -xxxx. Ry • General nature • Adhoc straw poll result TE M • #xxx NOT REALLY A STRAW POLL – to forward the mechanism in 11 -09/xxxxry to the task group as a motion to become part of the specification framework or draft specification for TGac – 09 -11 -19 PM 1 TGac action xxxx Submission Slide 39 Fischer, Lee, Zhu

May 2011 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -11/ 1531 r 4 References • • 11 -09 -1175 -r 0 -00 ac-Ad. Hoc Groups Scope_v 3. ppt 11 -09 -1181 -00 -00 ac-ad-hoc-lifecycle. ppt 11 -09 -1167 -00 -00 ac-tgac-ad-hoc-group-operation-and-chair-selectionprocedure. pptx 11 -09 -0059 -05 -00 ac-802 -11 ac-proposed-selection-procedure. doc 11 -09 -0838 -02 -00 ac-supporting-document-for-tgac-evaluationmethodology. ppt 11 -09 -0451 -09 -00 ac-tgac-functional-requirements-and-evaluationmethodology. doc 11 -09 -0992 -02 -00 ac-proposed-specification-framework-for-tgac. doc 11 -06 -0689 -01 -000 n-tgn-MAC-LB 84 -Ad-Hoc-Operation. ppt – Suggested rules document Submission Slide 40 Fischer, Lee, Zhu