Normative Ethics Section 2 Consequentialism Its Critics Consequences

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
Normative Ethics Section 2 Consequentialism & Its Critics

Normative Ethics Section 2 Consequentialism & Its Critics

Consequences and Rightness Consequences relevant to rightness of action: n intended ones n all

Consequences and Rightness Consequences relevant to rightness of action: n intended ones n all foreseeable ones. Consequences NOT relevant to rightness of action: n unforeseeable ones. Note: consequences include physical changes effected by an action. 2

Principle of Double Effect n Intended consequences of acts and omissions are morally relevant,

Principle of Double Effect n Intended consequences of acts and omissions are morally relevant, but foreseen though unintended consequences are not usually relevant. Consider why people are attracted to this principle & appraise it. 3

Principle of Double Effect § Not needed to explain judgements about certain examples (e.

Principle of Double Effect § Not needed to explain judgements about certain examples (e. g. self-defence). § These judgements can be explained better on a consequentialist basis. 4

Intentions n n Not necessarily crucial to rightness of action, but still important in

Intentions n n Not necessarily crucial to rightness of action, but still important in ethics. Enable actions to be identified. 5

Motive & Character n Morality of action as distinguishable from that of character &

Motive & Character n Morality of action as distinguishable from that of character & of motive. A consequentialist account can be given for both - morality of action - morality of character & motive. n 6

Principle of Acts & Omissions § Foreseen consequences of acts are morally relevant, but

Principle of Acts & Omissions § Foreseen consequences of acts are morally relevant, but foreseen consequences of omissions are NOT always morally relevant, and this is so even when the consequences of those acts & omissions are identical. Consider why people are attracted to this principle & appraise it. 7

Principle of Acts & Omissions § Not needed to explain judgements about certain examples

Principle of Acts & Omissions § Not needed to explain judgements about certain examples (e. g. poisoning). § These judgements can be explained better on a consequentialist basis. 8

Negative Responsibility n Agents are just as responsible for their omissions (what they don’t

Negative Responsibility n Agents are just as responsible for their omissions (what they don’t do / fail to do), as for their acts. Appraise the idea of negative responsibility. 9

Normative Theory § Theories with a place for moral rules are preferable to those

Normative Theory § Theories with a place for moral rules are preferable to those that relate solely to single actions. n n Consequentialist theories of moral rules are preferable to intuitionist ones. The former are able to appraise & justify rules. 10

Practice-consequentialism n n Practices, rather than mere abstract rules, benefit society. Those practices involve

Practice-consequentialism n n Practices, rather than mere abstract rules, benefit society. Those practices involve human solidarity. They can be actual or possible. Practice-consequentialism can address conflicting rules. 11