Nor Dig T report to Excom Nor Dig

  • Slides: 22
Download presentation
Nor. Dig T report to Excom Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019

Nor. Dig T report to Excom Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Nor. Dig Ex. Com agenda 10 th October 2019: Not updated Place: Clarion hotel, Arlanda in Stockholm 1. Agenda and report from previous meeting 2. Organizational matters T report to Excom Nor. Dig alsituation s o p 2. 1. Membership o r p ft a ating r d d p u n o p u d Per T first 2. 2. Finance e 2019, bas r matters e b to c O 0 1 g 2. 3. Organizational meetin h 2019 arcmatters rt fr previous repo om M 3. Report from Nor. Dig/T 3. 1. Nor. Dig/T status & planning 3. 2. dynamic metadata HDR updated status report 4. Report from Industry 5. Reports from members, DVB and other 6. Any other business 7. Date and place for the meetings in 2019, next 7 th Oct 2019 Green Text: text highlighted for Excom (waiting Excom decision/approval) 1

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th Overview specification work October

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th Overview specification work October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Not updated Overview • Nor. Dig T specification work : Rules of Operation • • • Unified IRD specification • • Latest: Test Plan v 3. 1. 1 (published September 2019, incl Test addendum for SSU) • Nor. Dig Test streams, 12 streams for testing NGA/AC-4 + old LTE interference stream, to be used together with new Test Plan v 3. 1. 1 Video – potential HEVC extension: dynamic HDR investigating report to Excom - see separate slides EPG/EIT exchange file format • • Latest published: IRD spec v 3. 1. 1 (published September 2019) Test Plan • • Latest published: Ro. O v 2. 5 (published October 2016) Update of Ro. O to v 3. 1, focus for 2019 but first Test. Plan v 3. 1. Excom (Oct 2018) asked for changing layout to same as IRD spec, most important content for Ro. O shall be items necessary to avoid misbehavior in IRDs. Workshop May 2019 and plan new Nov 2019. Website and admin 2

Nor. Dig T report - Work and subgroups Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th

Nor. Dig T report - Work and subgroups Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Not updated Overview - informative group – status - chairman Nor. Dig T – active – Per Tullstedt, Teracom Nor. Dig T subgroups – status • Audio – active – Johan Lindroos, SVT • Test – active – (Pasi Toiva, Labwise) Per T and Peter M has co-chaired in absence of Pasi during autumn 2018 - 2019 • Ro. O – Des Mac Giolla an Chloig, RTÉNL • Accessibility – active – Kjell Norberg, NRK • API/PVR – active – Erik Vold, NRK • EPG/Event exchange metadata – active - Peter Mølsted, consultant (Nor. Dig tech secretary) • SSU – within Nor. Dig T • CA/CI+/Sec – within Nor. Dig T • Video – within Nor. Dig T (been active for v 3. 1. 1 now dormant) 3

Nor. Dig T report - Meeting calendar 2017 Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th

Nor. Dig T report - Meeting calendar 2017 Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Not updated Nor. Dig T (main group) meeting calendar 2019: meetings 2019 are booked as shorter (typically 2 -3 h/meeting) compared to 2018 (5 -6 h/meeting) • Nor. Dig T, #1, Thu 31 st January 2019, webinar, 10: 00 -12: 30 CET • Nor. Dig T, #2, Tue 26 th February 2019, webinar, 10: 00 -14: 00 CET Informative: Excom 7 th March • • • Nor. Dig T, #3, Tue 2 nd April 2019, webinar, 10: 00 -12: 30 CET Nor. Dig T, #4, Tue 14 th May 2019, TBD physical/webinar, 10: 00 -15: 00 CET, Nor. Dig T, #5, Tue 18 th June 2019, webinar, placeholder, 10: 00 -12: 30 CET Nor. Dig T, #6, Tue 27 th August 2019, webinar, 10: 00 -14: 00 CET Nor. Dig T, #7, Tue 24 th Sep 2019, webinar, 10: 00 -16: 00 CET. Informative: Excom 10 th October (target Ro. O v 3. 2/3. 1, IRD spec v 3. 2, Test Plan 3. 2) • Nor. Dig T, #8, Thu 17 th October 2019, webinar, 10: 00 -14: 00 CET • Nor. Dig T, #9, Tue 3 rd December 2019, webinar, placeholder, 10: 00 -12: 00 CET. 4

Nor. Dig T report – Nor. Dig countries/networks Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th

Nor. Dig T report – Nor. Dig countries/networks Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Not draft updated List of Countries using Nor. Dig specifications (outside Nor. Dig members), Nothing new to report, same as last meeting (same as previous report). Several IRD manufactures and other mentions that several other territories and DVB networks refers or uses Nor. Dig as basis for their IRD specs (especially “newer” networks). Among reasons seems open spec and content (T 2, Hbb. TV, subtitling etc). Country / Network Status Turkey DTT Confirmed via Vestel Several eastern Europe countries Indications, not confirmed Malaysia (blue copy) Digita German DTT (Media broadcast/TDF) Based on/reference to Nor. Dig IRD Georgia DTT Based on/reference to Nor. Dig IRD (v 2. 2) French DTT/FAVN ? ? Based on/reference to Nor. Dig IRD v? ? Italien DTT + Satellite Partly based on/reference to Nor. Dig IRD (v 2. 5, RF), partly own requirements (e. g. SI) Poland DTT Might be based on/reference to Nor. Dig IRD 5

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting •

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting • Video dynamic HDR 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Background: Dynamic metadata High. Dynamic. Range (d. HDR) and High. Frame. Rate (HFR): • Investigating as Excom asked Oct 2018: • • • Members interest now 2019 for HFR and/or dynamic HDR (should Nor. Dig add both or one of them? ). If dynamic HDR is recommended, then should it be included as a new IRD “profile” (two Nor. Dig HEVC “profiles” (basic HEVC and d. HDR HEVC IRD) or extent the existing HEVC IRD “profile” (with a certain grace period)? If dynamic HDR, how many of DVB three alt to be included? Which one if not all? As earlier Nor. Dig based upon DVB spec, only variants inside coming DVB specs is relevant here. Excom meeting March 2019: • HFR: low interest right now to introduce -> postponed • • d. HDR: interest but Excom to investigate members concrete interest and demands, d. HDR: technical group study more, too early to start drafting, commercial requirement should be updated (old commercial requirements used for HEVC&NGA) Under discussion today static HDR (both HLG 10 & PQ 10) SFR up to 50 fps e. g. 1080 p 50 fps d. HDR 6

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting Video

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting Video dynamic HDR 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Dynamic metadata HDR (d. HDR) • • • DVB d. HDR status: spec finalized, DVB/ETSI spec published, DVB prepare reference streams f d. HDR (OTT) DASH d. HDR status: under publication prel w 3 month ETSI spec DVB has included 3 d. HDR technologies/formats, all HDR PQ 10 based: • Technicolor/Philips SL-HDR 2 (ETSI TS 103 433 -2, SMPTE ST 2094 -20 Philips & 2094 -30 Technicolor formats) • Samsung HDR 10+ (SMPTE ST 2094 -40) • Dolby Vision (ETSI TS 103 572, SMPTE ST 2094 -10) (Note: all three d. HDR candidates been present in Nor. Dig-T/video subgroup meetings) All 3 d. HDR formats are backward compatible for static HDR/PQ 10 IRDs to receive and display (up to broadcaster/colourist to ensure performance for static HDR HEVC IRDs). HLG d. HDR, • work ongoing in ETSI (JTC broadcast group) for Technicolor/Philips SL-HDR 3, Dolby mention already support but not promoted (since DVB so far been for PQ). • Conversion possible from HLG d. HDR to PQ d. HDR within same format (Technicolor/Philips SL-HDR 3 to SL-HDR 2) d. HDR bandwidth • All formats has low extra capacity (in magnitude of 100 kbps or less) • supports of “simulcast” several d. HDR metadata formats for one and the same video stream in (DVB requirement, so far not yet tested) • • Indication/example, SL-HDR 2 typically around 1 -15 kbps Nor. Dig-T/video has not (yet) compared the 3 formats (pros&cons, relative efficiency, IPR costs…). d. HDR already used in some OTT/Online streaming services (e. g. Netflix, Amazon, Apple, multiple formats used) and available in some TV sets (even if it might not yet impl as coming DVB signalling for d. HDRs). (Note, we can not expect that current d. HDR impl on TV sets will work for broadcast usage or DVB DASH streaming). Conversion from one d. HDR format to another, could harm “artistic intension” from colourist, content owner/broadcasters may not allow this, no “approved” method today. 7

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting •

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting • 7 th Video dynamic HDR March 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Members view (broadcasters and operators) • SVT, DR & NRK: • - d. HDR, right now more interest than HFR and UHD, d. HDR could make big difference espec for drama production, d. HDR roll-out could for example be first via OTT streaming and later within broadcast, d. HDR too early today to select one of the formats, d. HDR could accept that this would be optional tool for IRD (initially), (but big interest among broadcasters - backward compatibility is of interesting TV format: 1080 p 50 fps d. HDR - DR: - • • for d. HDR than Nor. Dig should mandate d. HDR w grace period) HFR 100 fps could accept wait and revisit topic later, a bit challenging to produce right now SVT/Lars typical future production could be: drama 2160 p 25 fps d. HDR and sports/general 1080 p 100 fps SDR/HDR. Difficult for PSB to choose exclude viewers due to only select one d. HDR tech As DR understand it today: Static HDR not as big step for viewers to SDR compared to d. HDR, therefore interest in basic SDR/HLG Test streams: some interest to collect test streams TDC: follow broadcasters, CD: some interest depends upon broadcasters Preferebly if Nordic & Irish broadcasters could agree upon a common d. HDR format (for production). Propose to make a study around d. HDR to find a common d. HDR among broadcasters. new tools w HEVC: Nor. Dig broadcasters interest (2017 Nor. Dig work) If d. HDR format, then the decision of which d. HDR format should be done productions side and not on the IRD side ? Figure: data from Nor. Dig T/video HEVC study 2017 and questionnaire. Note about Full. HD, refers to as subresolution UHD BT 2020 10 bits HDR WCG d. HDR HFR Full. HD UHD 1080 p 2160 p 8

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting •

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting • 7 th Video dynamic HDR March 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Industry view • d. HDR, most TV manufacture prefer d. HDR is optional feature in Nor. Dig. • d. HDR, if Nor. Dig would add d. HDR (as mandatory), than most manufactures request only one d. HDR format and not require all 3 formats, similar NGA • Samsung, TP Vision prefer markets decide themselves (i. e. not specified in Nor. Dig? ) • d. HDR already in some TV sets, already used for some services, smaller step than HFR • d. HDR, manufactures asks for service plans/roll-out plans from broadcaster to consider this. Nor. Dig should collect from members/broadcasters and regular present/provide service plans and intensions to the Industry. (Sony) With all improvement in video processing and display in new modern TV sets, reduces the diff betw s. HDR and d. HDR • • Source: https: //www. flatpanelshd. com/focus. php? subaction=showfull&id=1543913516 9

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting 7

Nor. Dig T report - T F A DR Nor. Dig Excom meeting 7 th Video dynamic HDR March 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Summary mini-study and proposal Nor. Dig HEVC extensions dynamic HDR: • d. HDR - - DVB has specified three formats [Technicolor/Philips SL-HDR 2, Samsung HDR 10+, Dolby Vision] no result f comparing, coming/already in several TV sets to some degree (not as DVB specified), Service plans in Europe: - broadcast: no info, several considering, live broadcast trials been made in France and Spain. - French DTT seems to draft optional d. HDR (all 3 formats) and IRD shall not be disturb by format not supported - (DTG no disc/action/planning yet around broadcast HEVC nor d. HDR) - OTT: already on-air Nor. Dig Broadcasters: high interest from broadcasters (for usage in some program events, like drama productions) Nor. Dig work around d. HDR: - Nor. Dig Excom will collect from members/broadcasters service plans and intensions and (regularly) present it the Industry /Nor. Dig T (planned to be presented at Excom meeting 10 th Oct 2019) - Nor. Dig T/video group study more, report back in Oct 2019 (waiting Excom decision before start drafting) 10

Nor. Dig T report - Hbb. TV and Nor. Dig EPG/Event info Nor. Dig

Nor. Dig T report - Hbb. TV and Nor. Dig EPG/Event info Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Not updated Hbb. TV status: • • • Nor. Dig IRD spec v 3. 1: Hbb. TV v 2. 0. 2 (latest available) Nor. Dig Test Plan: test tasks now updated in Test Plan v 3. 1 proposal Nor. Dig Hbb. TV meeting at Digita’s Hbb. TV plugfest March 2019 Nor. Dig EPG group and Event exchange file format: • • • Keep TV Anytime spec up to date - developed six Nor. Dig proposals for updated of TVAnytime spec. final reviewed at ETSI, expected release end March 2019. Updated of guidelines Work to promote / help impl and use of Nor. Dig EPG/event file format Open workshop Nov 2018 at TV 2 DK in Copenhagen, successful Next open workshop 16. May 2019 at TV 2 Norway in Bergen Status of implementation and use of Nor. Dig common EPG/Event metadata exchange format, done or in process: NRK, TV 2 DK, TV 2 NO, DR, TDC, Red Be Media. 11

Nor. Dig T report - Unified IRD spec, after v 3. 1 Nor. Dig

Nor. Dig T report - Unified IRD spec, after v 3. 1 Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Not updated Nor. Dig Unified IRD spec future – “v 3. 2” proposals: • • General – Bug list - a few number of listed items, – – (CI+ ECP optional or mandatory - see other slides) (Audio APD signaling optional or mandatory - see other slides) Video: dynamic HDR and/or HFR – – • Excom earlier decided for incl of a HFR HEVC IRD profile within 2 years after our first HEVC IRD profile Dec 2017, Nor. Dig T has not started this work, Nor. Dig T/video report back to Excom d. HDR and HFR, see other slides CA/CP/Security – Common. Interface v 2 (USB), still monitoring status, members interest? • Audio – none • Subtitling – none • Hbb. TV - none • Front. End – none • SSU - none • PSI/SI, menus etc… • Others? Excom view? 12

Nor. Dig T report – report DVB status Not updated Nor. Dig Excom meeting

Nor. Dig T report – report DVB status Not updated Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden • DVB CI v 2 (USB) – Specs published Dec 2018 – Blah blah • DVB-I – At IBC 2019, DVB will present the world’s first showcase of DVB-I, a new suite of specifications that is designed to improve OTT delivery, providing increased scalability and cost savings with the same user-friendliness and robustness as classical broadcast delivery solutions. – DVB-I enhances the viewer experience for hybrid and broadband television through advanced features like integrated channel lists, interactive content guides, and simple lean-back channel selection. – Low Latency DASH (LL-DASH) – Multicast Adaptive Bit Rate (m. ABR) still in delvelopment 13

Nor. Dig T report – Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm,

Nor. Dig T report – Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden END presentation Nor. Dig-T report After here some detailed informative slides ANNEX – Annex A: Nor. Dig T mandates 2019 -2020 – Annex B: – Annex C: 14

Nor. Dig T report - mandates and activities (1/4) Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10

Nor. Dig T report - mandates and activities (1/4) Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Nor. Dig T – mandates & items for period 2019 -2020 - Excom approved March 2019 • General: Keep IRD, Ro. O and Test Plan in line with each other • Ro. O – – • Maintain and update Nor. Dig Ro. O - focus for 2019 Ro. O v 3. 1. x (Excom Oct 2018) changing layout to same as IRD spec, focus for Ro. O on items necessary to avoid misbehavior in IRDs. Test and Test plan – Maintain and update Nor. Dig Test plan to match IRD spec • Review and where possible combine similar test cases to make it easier and faster to test • “minimize” redundant test cases if possible without compromising with test quality, to speed up time for verification testing. • Update and improve test cases • Nor. Dig Unified IRD spec – Maintain and update Nor. Dig IRD specification • debugging, references to international standards and specifications are up to date) – – Nor. Dig IRD spec update - investigate HEVC dynamic HDR Other items (listed since earlier): • Review and improve IRD’s auto update for network changes? • Handle mix of broadcast and OTT in same channel list? (similar to or based upon DVB-I) 15

Nor. Dig T report - mandates and activities (2/4) Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10

Nor. Dig T report - mandates and activities (2/4) Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden continue Nor. Dig mandates & items for period 2019 -2020 • Video, audio, subtitling – – – – – Video codec: Nor. Dig’s first subset of HEVC (DVB’s UHD, HDR&WCG, SFR), incl video processing and I/O (HDMI). New Video codec: monitor/investigate issues with adding HEVC d. HDR support, check with Industry, make proposal New Video codec: If Excom decide, propose tech requirements for dynamic HDR Video: Secure good IRD implementation for mixing/blending of SDR content (Hbb. TV, menus, subtitling) on top of HDR video. Audio NGA (Dolby AC-4), monitor DVB and Dolby specifications and recommendations Audio: monitor evolution immersive audio and object based audio. Audio: if it is possible supports with tests and trials of NGA audio (both basic NGA and more advanced NGA). Subtitling: monitor DVB specifications (TXT subt, DVB Subt, TTML). Hbb. TV: Investigate use and mandate of new codes (HEVC and NGA) for (HEVC) Hbb. TV/Hybrid IRDs. 16

Nor. Dig T report - mandates and activities (3/4) Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10

Nor. Dig T report - mandates and activities (3/4) Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden continue Nor. Dig mandates & items for period 2019 -2020 • Hbb. TV – – – Nor. Dig Hbb. TV test and test cases: • Maintain Nor. Dig developed test cases. Propose new test cases to be developed if needed. Nor. Dig Hbb. TV IRD requirements: • Maintain and update Hbb. TV requirements • Monitor and report Hbb. TV spec development and usage. Investigate additional Hbb. TV feature and requirements that are of interest for Nor. Dig members (to be confirmed by –T and Excom before detailed proposal and any incl into IRD spec). • Investigate DVB-TA watermarking, impact V/A and possibility to use for STB solutions where STB do not support Hbb. TV (STB bypass) – – Hbb. TV implementation: • Monitor and report Hbb. TV implementation in Nor. Dig networks and other networks, • Monitor and report implementation status on IRD side • Monitor and discuss experience and issues/problems with launching Hbb. TV services Hbb. TV DRM • Monitor Hbb. TV DRM • Review security requirements 17

Nor. Dig T report - mandates and activities (4/4) Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10

Nor. Dig T report - mandates and activities (4/4) Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden continue Nor. Dig mandates & items for period 2019 -2020 • Accessibility – – – – • CA and CI – – • Work with harmonization of broadcast and better describe current broadcast for IRD manufactures Subtitling, propose updates and new IRD requirements both for normal and hard-of-hearing subtitling. Create document explaining the work of the group, (which Ex. Com members to pass this to their internal accessibility teams). Gather information from accessibility groups and broadcasters to understand what their pain points are. Set up a best practice workshop with broadcasters, manufacturers and distributors Investigate the implications for streaming services on accessibility Hbb. TV for Accessibility services – investigate how Hbb. TV can be used for Accessibility and if needed propose changes to IRD and Ro. O requirements Investigate benefits with NGA for accessibility. monitor and report CIplus LLP (CI+ v 1. 4 and v 2. 0) and DVB work (CI+ v 2. 0 etc) within these topics to Nor. Dig Excom and Technical group. Review security requirements EPG/Event exchange file format: – – – Promote use for Nor. Dig members for example via open workshops to support promoting and implementation of Nor. Dig TVA format. Maintain Nor. Dig specification of common EPG/Event exchange file format and Guidelines, to be inline with TA Anytime specs Common solution and recommendations about unique program ID’s. Translation of genres between Nordic and Irich language and English. Transform Nor. Dig TVA XML schemas to JSON and developing guidelines for using TVA with JSON (on request from developers) 18

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th Accessibility report status (1/4)

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting 10 th Accessibility report status (1/4) October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Not updated Investigate members usage of accessibility features and how it is signalized within the Nor. Dig area (audioand subtitle- languages, dubbing, spoken subtitles, sign languages and more). Make an overview. (Full report in Annex B of this presentation). Mission • To understand the current state of accessibility services across the Nor. Dig region • To survey the members and gather feedback • To find the pain points in workflows • To find possible pain points in the customer experience • To learn if the technologies specified in the Nor. Dig specification are being used • To find our why certain technologies are used or not used Questionnaire Jan 2019 Questions asked to what extent the following accessibility / disability services types are used today: • Audio Description (AD) • Spoken subtitles (audio captioning) • Same-language Subtitles (captioning) / Hard-of-Hearing Subtitles (Ho. H or HHS) • Sign Language Description (video) • Common questions (Prime time in this questionnaire was defined from 19: 00 to 23: 00 every day, may differ in countries) 19

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting Not updated 10 th Accessibility report

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting Not updated 10 th Accessibility report status (2/4) October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Conclusions 1 The use of accessibility in broadcast services • More requirements and guidelines for accessibility are expected to be drafted as a result of the EAA and AVMS Directives (EAA = European Accessibility Act and AVMSD = Audio visual media services directive) • It was identified that in many cases, except “Same Language Subtitles”, the provision of Accessibility services was lower than ideal, although always meeting minimum regulations, this may be because of several reasons: – Broadcasters want everyone to be able to receive their services, so transmission is done the simplest way which may not always be the most spectrally efficient or the best use of available technology. – There is a perception that legacy receivers may cause problems are preventing broadcasters from launching new services or using new features. 20

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting Not updated 10 th Accessibility report

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting Not updated 10 th Accessibility report status (3/4) October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Conclusions 2 The use of accessibility in broadcast services • Pre-testing of Accessibility features on receivers (typically based upon Nordig testplan) may not always catch all problems and broadcaster use-case. (Some functionality like receiver mix is used outside Nordig area) • Re-testing of new Accessibility features on legacy receivers is likely to be expensive and broadcasters need to have a simple launch program. • Broadcasters tends to use other types of broadcast technology than those recommended in Nordig/DVB, like setting up separate services for new accessibility features. • Broadcasters do not prioritize informing consumers about their accessibility services and how to find them on different IRDs. • Conclusion: We have a common spec, but all broadcasters are doing things their own way. 21

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting Not updated 10 th Accessibility report

Nor. Dig T report Nor. Dig Excom meeting Not updated 10 th Accessibility report status (4/4) October 2019 Stockholm, Sweden Next Steps • The Nordig Accessibility group should prepare a short document explaining the work of the group and ask Ex. Com members to pass this to their internal accessibility teams. – Invite them to contribute and ask questions. – We propose a to set up a best practice workshop with broadcasters, manufacturers and distributors – Broadcasters who are considering to launch a new or modify an existing accessibility service should contact Nordig Accessibility group. • We should gather information from accessibility groups and broadcasters to understand what their pain points are. • Collaborate with these accessibility groups so they can inform their members how to find/use the existing services. – We propose a question to external accessibility groups: Should Nordig Broadcasters deliver additional accessibility services even if not all IRDs can receive them initially? • Investigate the implications for streaming services on accessibility Excom view? 22