New STA process Technical Engagement Jenna Dilkes Programme

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
New STA process Technical Engagement Jenna Dilkes Programme Manager - Planning and Operations, Technology

New STA process Technical Engagement Jenna Dilkes Programme Manager - Planning and Operations, Technology Appraisals © NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to notice of rights.

Technical Engagement – Who? What? Why? When? • Update on new Single Technology Appraisal

Technical Engagement – Who? What? Why? When? • Update on new Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process • When and why have we included Technical Engagement • What is it? • How will it look? • How can stakeholders get involved? • Post Technical Engagement actions 2

New Single Technology Appraisal Process (STA) • Introduced in April 2018 https: //www. nice.

New Single Technology Appraisal Process (STA) • Introduced in April 2018 https: //www. nice. org. uk/process/pmg 19/chapter/ac knowledgements • Getting to the right decision at the right time 3

New process steps TA process Invitation to participate Evidence submission Evidence Assessment Technical engagement

New process steps TA process Invitation to participate Evidence submission Evidence Assessment Technical engagement Committee preparation Appraisal committee meeting Final or draft guidance issued Final guidance publication 4

Technical Engagement overview Additional step in the Technology Appraisal process aiming to pull forward

Technical Engagement overview Additional step in the Technology Appraisal process aiming to pull forward consideration of scientific and technical elements prior to committee * approximate timings 5

Technical Report example Issue # Stopping rule Background/description The trial protocol specified that treatment

Technical Report example Issue # Stopping rule Background/description The trial protocol specified that treatment with the intervention should stop after 1 of issue year. The company (link to section of submission) assumed in their model that treatment stopped after 1 year to reflect the trial protocol. The technical team are concerned that in clinical practice, treatment may continue beyond 1 year, because the risk of relapse continues. Why this issue is important The stopping rule has a large impact on the cost effectiveness results, because there are no costs associated with the intervention after 1 year. A scenario analysis without the stopping rule increases the ICER from £ 45 k to £ 60 k. Technical team preliminary scientific judgement and rationale A 1 year stopping rule is not appropriate, because the risk of relapse remains, and it is unclear whether it would be possible to implement such a rule in clinical practice. Questions for engagement 1. In clinical practice, would treatment continue beyond 1 year? 2. Is it possible to implement a 1 year stopping rule in the NHS? 6

Technical report - response form template Questions for engagement Issue 1: Stopping rule 1.

Technical report - response form template Questions for engagement Issue 1: Stopping rule 1. In clinical practice, would treatment continue beyond 1 year? 2. Is it possible to implement a 1 -year stopping rule in the NHS? 7

How do patient organisations get involved? Experts • Creation of the Technical Report (if

How do patient organisations get involved? Experts • Creation of the Technical Report (if required) • Technical engagement TC Stakeholder organisations • Responding to Technical Report questions during the engagement stage 8

Post Technical Engagement • NICE technical team update the technical report • The updated

Post Technical Engagement • NICE technical team update the technical report • The updated technical report and the technical engagement comments are included in the committee papers (sent 2 weeks prior to the appraisal committee meeting (ACm)) • Committee papers are also published on the NICE website post ACm alongside the ACD or FAD. 9

New process topics ID 1175 Durvalumab for maintenance treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer

New process topics ID 1175 Durvalumab for maintenance treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemoradiation - Committee D Technical Engagement starts w/c 17. 12. 18. Committee meeting: 14. 02. 19 ID 1302 Osimertinib for untreated EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer Committee D Technical Engagement starts w/c 14. 01. 19. Committee meeting: 20. 03. 19 ID 1318 Ribociclib in combination with fulvestrant for treating advanced hormone-receptor positive, HER 2 -negative breast cancer – Committee A Technical Engagement starts w/c 07. 01. 19. Committee meeting: 12. 03. 19 10

Questions? 11

Questions? 11