Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Animal Domestications

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Animal Domestications America’s Middle East Asia • Llamas • Sheep •

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Animal Domestications America’s Middle East Asia • Llamas • Sheep • Water Buffalo • Goats • Buffalo • Pigs Africa • Wild Cattle

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Animal Domestications Tendencies: 1. Agriculturalist’s tended to domesticate animals that flocked

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Animal Domestications Tendencies: 1. Agriculturalist’s tended to domesticate animals that flocked toward “farms”; these animals replaced the need to hunt – domesticated animals provided milk, meat, energy, and hides.

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Animal Domestications Tendencies: 2. If there were no practical animals to

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Animal Domestications Tendencies: 2. If there were no practical animals to domesticate (America’s), hunting and foraging remained a vital part of survival.

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Animal Domestications Tendencies: 3. If there was a shortage of food

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Animal Domestications Tendencies: 3. If there was a shortage of food for livestock (Desert geographies) people tended to practice pastoralism, and migrated to feed their animals.

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Social Changes 1. People live in small towns and villages 2.

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Social Changes 1. People live in small towns and villages 2. Less movement and migration 3. Formation of common cultural beliefs 4. Less “free time” 5. Craft specializations 6. More interdependency 7. Spread of disease

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Demographic Changes 1. Population increases dramatically – food surpluses stabilize communities

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Demographic Changes 1. Population increases dramatically – food surpluses stabilize communities 2. 7500% increase during the core of the Neolithic time period! Date Population 10, 000 BCE 1, 000 5, 000 BCE 10, 000 2, 000 BCE 27, 000 1, 000 BCE 75, 000 0 CE 200, 00 0

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Impacts on Gender Relationships • • • POSITIVES FOR WOMEN Knowledge

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Impacts on Gender Relationships • • • POSITIVES FOR WOMEN Knowledge on what grows best required (foundations in gathering) Communities organized around kinship and marriage (matrilineal) Symbols of fertility – rise of female deities

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Impacts on Gender Relationships NEGATIVES FOR WOMEN • Farming becomes role

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Impacts on Gender Relationships NEGATIVES FOR WOMEN • Farming becomes role of males – physically demanding • Become charged with domestic activities • Have children more frequently; don’t have to carry children on migrations anymore… • Less opportunities to gain skills outside of the domestic sphere

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Ancient Cities – Catal Huyuk (Anatolia)

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Ancient Cities – Catal Huyuk (Anatolia)

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Ancient Cities – Jericho (Syria)

Neolithic Agricultural Revolutions Ancient Cities – Jericho (Syria)