NECAP RampUp Programs Central Elementary School Math Grade

NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Central Elementary School Math Grade 4 § 4 /5 Students Improved • 2/5 Improved 2 levels • 2/5 Improved 1 level • 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4 § 8/9 Students Improved • 8/9 Improved by 1 level • 1/9 Went down 1 level (PP-SBP)

NECAP Ramp-Up Program Lonsdale Elementary School Math Grade 4 § 5/6 Students Improved • 1/6 Improved 2 levels • 4/6 Improved 1 level • 1/6 No Change Math Grade 5 § 3/3 Students Improved • 3/3 Improved 1 Level Reading Grade 4 § 9/11 Improved • 1/11 Improved 2 Levels • 8/11 Improved 1 Level • 1/11 No Change Reading Grade 5 § 3 / 4 Students Improved • 1/4 Improved 2 level • 1 /4 Improved 1 Level • 1 /4 No Change

NECAP Ramp-Up Program Northern Elementary School Grade 4 Math § 3/4 Students Improved • 1/4 Improved 2 Levels • 2/4 Improved 1 level • 1/4 No Change Grade 4 Reading § 4/5 Students Improved • 4/5 Improved 1 Level • 2/5 No Change Grade 5 Math § 2/6 Students Improved • 2/6 Improved 1 Level • 4/6 No Change Grade 5 Reading § 5/5 Students Improved • 1/6 Improved 2 Levels • 4/6 Improved 1 Level • 1/6 N/C

NECAP Ramp-Up Program Saylesville Elementary School Math Grade 4 § 5/13 improved • 5/13 Improved 1 level • 8/13 No Change Reading Grade 4 § 10/13 Improved • 9/13 Improved 1 level • 1/13 Improved 2 levels • 3/13 No Change Math Grade 5 § 9/11 Improved • 9/11 Improved 1 level • 2/11 No Change Reading Grade 5 § 3/11 Improved • 3/11 Improved 1 level • 7/11 No Change • 1/11 Went down 1 level (P-PP)

NECAP Ramp-Up Program Math Lincoln High School § 18 Seniors • 10/18 Scored 2 • 3/18 Made enough improvement w/in 1 to meet graduation requirements • 5/18 Did not meet the NECAP progress requirements ELA § 4/12 Sophomores & will test in October 2014 § 6/12 Juniors • 5/6 Scored 3 • 1/6 Scored 1 § 2/12 Seniors • 2/2 Scored 3 13/18 Students attending the program passed NECAP on the second try

Lincoln Public Schools School Classifications 2013 - 2014

How Our Schools Are Classified PROFICIENCY DISTINCTION GAP-CLOSING PROGRESS GROWTH IMPROVEMENT GRADUATION TOTAL HOW SCHOOLS ARE CLASSIFIED K-8 30 POINTS 5 POINTS 30 POINTS 10 POINTS 25 POINTS 100 POINTS HIGH SCHOOL 30 POINTS 5 POINTS 30 POINTS 10 POINTS NA 5 POINTS 20 POINTS 100 POINTS

How our Schools Are Ranked RIDE ranks schools by Total Point Value, or Composite Index Score, to determine classifications: • Commended Schools have the highest index scores in the state and no achievement gaps; they are recognized because of either high performance or significant progress. • Leading Schools have an index score between 70 and 76. • Typical Schools have an index score between 50 and 70. • Warning Schools can be identified by any of seven criteria: index score <50; Proficiency of <10 or fewer points; School wide participation <95%; Sub group gap points < 15 points; student growth of <7. 5 ( Applicable to high schools only…Improvement plus Graduation of 10 points or fewer; low graduation rate over time). Failure to attain any AMO (Annual Measurable Objective) for three consecutive years. • Focus Schools have the lowest point totals in the state (excluding Priority Schools) for Proficiency or Gap-closing, regardless of their index score. • Priority Schools have the lowest Composite Index Scores in the state. Schools previously identified as Persistently Lowest Achieving are also Priority Schools.

2013 School Classification Summary 2013 SCHOOL CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY SCHOOL Central Elementary Lincoln Middle School Lincoln High School Lonsdale Elementary Northern Elementary Saylesville Elementary Title I Targets Passed Classification Total Points /100 Points From % PROF /30 SUBGROUP GAPS /30 PROG TO 2017 TARGET /5 % IN DISTINCTION /10 STUDENT GROWTH /25 HS GRADUATION /20 HS SCALED SCORE CHANGE /5 8/12 Typical 62. 00 18. 00 21. 00 4. 00 15. 00 10/12 Typical 54. 83 16. 00 16. 50 5. 00 4. 00 13. 33 13/15 Leading 71. 50 18. 00 19. 50 7. 00 3. 50 NA 20. 00 3. 50 12/12 Typical 65. 67 18. 00 21. 00 2. 00 3. 00 21. 67 12/12 Typical 68. 00 17. 00 21. 00 7. 00 3. 00 20. 00 14/14 Typical 66. 00 18. 00 21. 00 4. 00 3. 00 20. 00 Y

Comments • Saylesville went from an index score of 51. 67 to an index score of 66. 00 just 4 points away from a leading school and met all of their targets. • Lincoln High School is a Leading School. • Northern Elementary is 2 points away from becoming a leading school • Saylesville Elementary, Northern Elementary, and Lonsdale Elementary met all targets. • Participation rates district wide are excellent at 99. 70%. • Lincoln Middle School earned more total points and showed improvement in almost every area scored as compared to last year. • Lincoln Middle School Plan

Looking at the Year Ahead • Data Use District Wide. • PARCC • Lincoln Middle School Plan

Lincoln Middle School Classification 2013 and 2014 2013 Lincoln Middle School 9/14 Typical 53. 00 15. 00 16. 50 3. 00 3. 50 15. 00 16. 50 5. 00 4. 00 13. 33 2014 Lincoln Middle School 10/12 Typical 54. 83 16. 00

Lincoln Middle School-NECAP Mathematics 2011 -2013

Lincoln Middle School • Action Plan-Intensive Support – Additional 135 minutes of mathematics instruction per week for students with low NECAP scores. We will include all students who scored substantially below proficient and many who scored partial proficient. • Action Plan-Targeted Support – Additional 75 minutes per week of remediation to improve basic mathematics skills with these same students.

Lincoln Middle School • Action Plan-Teacher Support – Professional Development for mathematics teachers on the 8 Standards for Mathematical Practices built into the Common Core State Standards. Emphasis will be placed on standards: Perseverance in Problem Solving and Attend to Precision. – Community of Practice (COP)- Combined with department meetings will provide mathematics teacher with three hours of common planning time per month. – Data Team- Submitted plan to train the teachers on how to identify, view and interpret data. Mathematics teachers will be the first group trained.

Lincoln Middle School

Lincoln Middle School