NAVFAC Washington An Example of the NAVFAC Transformation

















- Slides: 17
NAVFAC Washington An Example of the NAVFAC Transformation --Presentation to the Washington DC SAME Post CAPT Chris Mossey Commanding Officer, Nav. Fac Washington 23 September 2004
Today’s Brief • NAVFAC Washington Transformation Overview • FY 05/06 Milcon Workload 2 NAVFAC Washington
List the Moving Parts • Public Works Center WASHINGTON ! e r o f e B – Served 10 Installations – 1 Oct 2003 expended to serve 18 installations – Went from 600 to 1, 100 employees – Provided maintenance, transportation, utilities, and engineering services • Engineering Field Activity CHESAPEAKE – 387 Employees – 23 Naval Activities – 18 Do. D/Other Agencies – Provided design, construction, environmental, and real estate services • Naval District Washington Regional Engineer – Served 10 Installations – 1 Oct 2003 expanded to serve 18 installations – Went from 60 to 175 employees – Provided shore facilities program management services Three Separate Organizations – All working various Facilities Issues 3 NAVFAC Washington
Structural Alignment ! r e t f A • Naval Facilities Engineering Command WASHINGTON – Serves 18 Navy Installations, 3 USMC Installations, and 18 other Do. D/Government Agencies – Provides complete range of public works, facilities management, and design/construction services – 1, 650 employees One Organization – Structurally Aligned 4 NAVFAC Washington
NAVFAC Washington and NDW Aligned • Five areas aligned with Navy Region • Each area is “an installation” • May be multiple fence lines in an installation • Single POC for all Facilities Services! Naval Base North Potomac ROICC Bethesda ROICC Thurmont Naval Base ROICC Wash DC Annapolis Washington ROICC DIA ROICC Annapolis Chesapeake Beach Naval Base South Potomac ROICC Dahlgren Naval Base Patuxent River DROICC Indian Hd ROICC PAX Rvr ROICC Quantico DROICC AAFB 5 NAVFAC Washington
Functional Alignment “The Ultimate Force-Multiplier” Business/Support Lines Commands NAVFAC HQ NAVFAC LANT NAVFAC PAC Spec. Ctrs. Cont. Engineering (CE) Navy Crane Center NAVFAC Engineering Service Center NAVFAC Expeditionary Logistics Center NAVFAC Washington NAVFAC Far East 6 NAVFAC Marianas Counsel (CNSL) NAVFAC Hawaii Chief Engineer (CHENG) NAVFAC Southwest Cmd Info Officer (CIO) NAVFAC Northwest Financial Mgmt (FM) NAVFAC Europe Acquisition (ACQ) NAVFAC Midwest Horizontal: • Common Business Processes • Workload Analysis and Shaping • Metrics NAVFAC Southeast Public Works (PW) NAVFAC Northeast Capital Improvements (CI) NAVFAC Washington Base Development (BD) NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Real Estate (RE) NAVFAC PAC Environmental (ENV) NAVFAC LANT Vertical: • Mission/Accountability • Client Interface for Workload Projections • Performance Assessment
NAVFAC Washington – Functional Alignment CO/XO/RE Safety Couns el CE Small Business Mgmt Svcs IT Bus Analysis Admi n Client Liaison Public Works Bus Line Core NAVFAC Washington LIT Securit y SPO URASO MD LEGEND: ICs COMBINED REGION IC ROICC / PW Central ROICC / PW North NPWOCPWOQPWO Gold IPT: North, Central, Quantico Base Development Bus Line Core ROICC / PW South Real Estate Bus Line Core ROICC / PW West Environmental Bus Line Core ROICC / PW East Capital Improvements Business Line Core Blue IPT: East, West, South EPWOWPWOSPWO FM VPR Non Region AOPS ROICC DIA AOPS HR DEP Regional Engineer OPS/DOPS Acquisitio n 7 Comptroller/Resource Mgr PW Quantico PAO ROICC QT Business Manager Vertical: • Mission/Accountability • Client Interface for Workload Projections • Performance Assessment Horizontal: • Common Business Processes • Workload Analysis and Shaping • Metrics
Functional Alignment • Functional Alignment of Nav. Fac Wash will allow: –Business Line focused management - Consistency of processes across Naval District Washington and the World! –Implementation of efficiency initiatives, such as: • Increased use of Design-Build Process • Facilities Support Contracts: –Increased use of the web for Service Contract orders – Consolidated Facilities Support Contracts across the region – Change inspection paradigm • Enterprise-wide integrated work management systems • Web. CM – Human Capital Strategy implementation – Consistent Metrics • Identify “best in class” approaches; export across region and across Navy 8 NAVFAC Washington
NAVFAC Washington Products & Services By Business Line • • Capital Improvements Public Works – CESE Mgt/WHE – Services – Utilities/Energy – Facility Mgt and Engineering Services – FSC Technical/Program Mgt – Construction – Design A&E – Design In-House – Specialized Technical Services – Ocean Engineering • Environmental • • – Environmental Planning/NEPA – Environmental Compliance & Conservation – Environmental Restoration Real Estate Contingency Engineering – Contingency Engineering/Mil Ops • Base Development – Facility Planning – Project Development 9 AC NAVF ton ing h s a W is a /Yr M 0 0 9 $ ess! n i s u B NAVFAC Washington
Design Build • Two phase process: – Phase 1: Advertise in FEDBIZOPPS the project requirements, D/B budget, and proposal requirements (Past Performance, Relevant Experience of Design Team, Construction Firm, and Design/Const Team) Evaluate proposals, down select to 2 – 5 firms Invite unsuccessful proposals to out brief to help be more competitive next time – Phase 2: Review proposals from short listed firms for Technical Approach, Construction Schedule, and Small Business Contracting Plan. 10 NAVFAC Washington
FY 05 Business • RMS – “Direct Funding” $702 M • Construction - $498 M • Facilities Support Contracts - $113 M • Environmental - $31 M • CNI/SECNAV/FAC - $60 M • Navy Working Capital Fund – $153 M • Direct Labor: $44 M • Materials: $20 M • Commodity: $89 M 11 NAVFAC Washington
FY 05 MCON & Defense Program • Hangar and Support Facility, PAX (1 st qtr) – 8 Bay Hangar –Testing and Labs –New Control Tower –SCIF • Atomic Clock Vault, US Naval Observatory (2 nd qtr) –New vault for Cesium fountain clock –Redundant Electric and HVAC • Agile Chemical Facility, Indian Head (4 th qtr) –New building for remote operations –Tanks –Containment structures –Upgrade of chemical storage and delivery systems –Demo 17 facilities • Andrews Air Force Base (1 st qtr) –Fighter Aircraft Alert Facility –Alert Airfield Support Facility –Munitions Storage Igloo 12 NAVFAC Washington
FY 05 MCON & Defense Program • Quantico –Green Side Hangar (2 nd qtr) • New Hangar • Maintenance shops and administrative offices • Supporting utilities • Pile foundation –The Basic School (TBS) Armory • Single story CMU –TBS BEQ • Multi-story • 2 x 0 room configuration • 130 rooms –White Side Hangar (2 nd qtr) • New Hangar • SCIF • Site Development • Pile foundation 13 –H&S Bn Headquarters • Single story CMU • 1300 sm NAVFAC Washington
FY 06 Proposed Program • Quantico –Green side Parking Apron –White side Parking Apron • Pax –Multi-Mission Maritime Hangar • Renovation • USNA –Field House • State of the Art Academic Athletic Facility • Various Locations –VXX Helicopter Support Facilities • AAFB –Physical Fitness Center –Visiting Quarters (Lodging – 80 units) • Bethesda –Graduate School of Nursing • Bolling AFB –Operations Facility 14 NAVFAC Washington
MACC Contractors Large MACC • John C. Grimberg • Whiting Turner • Skanska USA • Coakley Williams • Forrester • Sauer • Mortenson 15 Mid MACC • CER, Inc. • Tuckman Barbee • Centennial Contractors • Harkins Builders • WD Euille $ Associates • Hitt Contracting • Grunley Walsh JV • Hughes and Smith • Desbuild Inc. • Blazer Enterprises • Biscayne Contractors • Facchina Construction • JCM Associates NAVFAC Washington
Partnership Together, committed to become the best value provider of Facilities Engineering, Construction, Maintenance & Acquisition – Fleet Focused – Surge Enabler – Interdependent Global Team – Innovative – Ever Faster – Continuous Cost Reduction Counting on your Help, Talent, and Partnership RIGHT FORCE----RIGHT READINESS----RIGHT COST 16 NAVFAC Washington
Questions