Natural IVFET treatment success Neda Smiljan Severinski Marko

  • Slides: 25
Download presentation
Natural IVF/ET - treatment success Neda Smiljan Severinski Marko Gospić

Natural IVF/ET - treatment success Neda Smiljan Severinski Marko Gospić

Terminology • Natural IVF/ET cycle: cycle – Monitoring of natural cycle - ultrasound –

Terminology • Natural IVF/ET cycle: cycle – Monitoring of natural cycle - ultrasound – No any medication • Modified natural cycle – Monitoring of natural cycle – Only medication is h. CG injection for final oocyte maturation

Success of assisted reproduction ?

Success of assisted reproduction ?

How to define or calculate IVF/ET cycle success ? • CLINICAL PREGNANCY RATE (CPR):

How to define or calculate IVF/ET cycle success ? • CLINICAL PREGNANCY RATE (CPR): (positive heart beat in intrauterine embryo): • In relation to started cycle • In relation to number of oocyte aspirations • In relation to number of embryo transfers

How to define or calculate IVF/ET cycle sucess ? • LIVEBIRTH RATE: • In

How to define or calculate IVF/ET cycle sucess ? • LIVEBIRTH RATE: • In relation to started cycle • In relation to number of oocytes aspirations • In relation to number of embryo transfers

What is failed cycle of assisted reproduction ? v Cycle cancelation before ovum pick

What is failed cycle of assisted reproduction ? v Cycle cancelation before ovum pick up ? v Cycle with bad quality oocytes or without oocytes ? v Oocytes fertilisation failure or irregular fertilisation ? v Cycle without embryo transfer or bad quality embryos ? v Cycle with implantation failure ? v Cycle with positive h. CG, without clinical pregnancy ? v Cycle with vital clinical pregnancy but spontaneus abortion in first trimester? v. . .

Absent foliculogenesis and oogenesis • Patients category ? • Treatment options: v. Young reproductive

Absent foliculogenesis and oogenesis • Patients category ? • Treatment options: v. Young reproductive age • Natural cycle IVF/ET with diminished ovarian reserve or premature ovarian failure v. Older reproductive age (> 35 – 40) v. Old reproductive age ( > 40 ) v„Patient friendly IVF/ET” v. Conventional ovarian stimulation v. Agressive ovarian stimulation – „fight for every egg” v. Adjuvant drugs – androgens DHEA

Cycle without embryo transfer v. Bad quality of oocytes, sperm or embryos v. Growth

Cycle without embryo transfer v. Bad quality of oocytes, sperm or embryos v. Growth retarded embryos v. Disturbance in endometrium development v. Other complication • Treatment options: v. DHEA, corticosteroids, LH v. Estrogen, progesteron, sildenafil

Interpretation of treatment success? v Institutions with excellent succes of treatment : inclusion -

Interpretation of treatment success? v Institutions with excellent succes of treatment : inclusion - exclusion criterias to starting treatment v Some institution have „cut off” values: age, FSH, AMH or AFC v Results of donation treatment programme: represent the real success of some institutions in conventional IVF/ET treatment v. Who are patients in the center for infertility treatment?

Natural fecundability 5 months 50 Nulliparous 2. 7 months Parous

Natural fecundability 5 months 50 Nulliparous 2. 7 months Parous

Patients and methods • • • Period 1. 1. 2010 – 31. 12. 2011

Patients and methods • • • Period 1. 1. 2010 – 31. 12. 2011 ( two years ) 89 patients (couples) Age: mean = 34, 2 (min. = 24, max. = 45) 181 modified natural IVF/ET cycles mean = 2, 03 cycle/patient • only one patient had 8 natural IVF/ET cycles

Legal aspects of treatment • VII/2009 – VII/2012 “Restrictive” law • Health ensurance guarantee:

Legal aspects of treatment • VII/2009 – VII/2012 “Restrictive” law • Health ensurance guarantee: – No age limitation for treatment – Number of IVF/ET in natural cycle was unlimited

Age structure only 36% < 33 year

Age structure only 36% < 33 year

Results of treatment Total Number of cycles Number of ET/cycles Pregnancy number: /cycle /

Results of treatment Total Number of cycles Number of ET/cycles Pregnancy number: /cycle / ET Failed cycles - 181 65 (35, 9%) 15 (8, 3%) (23, 1%) 116 (64, 1%) No oocyte No fertilisation No developed embryo Growth retarded embryo Polyploidy

Period of treatment = 8 months = 8 modified natural cycle n = 89

Period of treatment = 8 months = 8 modified natural cycle n = 89 n=1 Treatment months

Pregnancy n = 15/89 couples (16, 8%) Max 8 Min 1 Treatment months

Pregnancy n = 15/89 couples (16, 8%) Max 8 Min 1 Treatment months

Completed cycles (n=65/181 – 35, 9%) Treatment months

Completed cycles (n=65/181 – 35, 9%) Treatment months

Pregnancy per cycle, overview Min 4, 2% Max 15, 4% Month of treatment

Pregnancy per cycle, overview Min 4, 2% Max 15, 4% Month of treatment

Pregnancy per embryotransfer, overview Max Min 14, 3% 40%

Pregnancy per embryotransfer, overview Max Min 14, 3% 40%

Failed cycles

Failed cycles

Cummulative results Month of treatment Cumulative cycles Cumulative pregnacies Cumulative pregnancies % 1 2

Cummulative results Month of treatment Cumulative cycles Cumulative pregnacies Cumulative pregnancies % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 89 126 147 159 164 165 166 8 11 12 14 15 15 8, 98 8, 73 8, 16 8, 88 9, 14 9, 09 9, 03 Chance for concieving in natural IVF/ET is 8 -9% in each month of treatment. After six months of treatment chance to concive would be 54 % !!!!

Theoretical calculation of success: pregnancy rate Month of treatment 1 2 3 4 5

Theoretical calculation of success: pregnancy rate Month of treatment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Theoretical number of women ( n ) 89 81 78 77 75 74 74 74 Real number of women (n) 89 45 (-36) 24 (-54) 13 (-63) 7 (-68) 1 (-73) Pregnancy per month (n) 8 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 Real cummulative pregnancies 8 11 12 14 15 15 Theoretical cummulative pregnancy ( 9%) 8 15 (+4) 22 29 36 (+10) (+15) (+21) 36 36 36 8, 98 8, 73 8, 16 9, 14 9, 09 9, 03 Monthly cummulative success % 8, 88 9, 14

Treatment problems 100% 45/89 = 50, 6% 24/45 = 53, 3% 13/24 = 54,

Treatment problems 100% 45/89 = 50, 6% 24/45 = 53, 3% 13/24 = 54, 2% 7/13 = 53, 8%

Conclusion • Monthly cummulative cuccess (PR/cycle) in modified natural cycles was about 9% in

Conclusion • Monthly cummulative cuccess (PR/cycle) in modified natural cycles was about 9% in each month • Significant amount of couples cancel their treatment after only three months. Why? • Continuation and repeating of monthly treatment in modified natural cycle may have positive influence on PR

Legal aspects of treatment • VII/2012 – today “Liberal” law • Health ensurance guarantee:

Legal aspects of treatment • VII/2012 – today “Liberal” law • Health ensurance guarantee: – age limitation for treatment – 42 year – Number of IVF/ET in natural cycle is only two – Chance to concive in modified natural cycle is 18% for each patient