NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

  • Slides: 54
Download presentation
NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ Human factors and AAGA Prof

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ Human factors and AAGA Prof Tim Cook NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Key points NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP likely underestimates

Key points NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP likely underestimates HF HF was highly prevalent in NAP 5 cases Institutional HF was notable – but so was individual HF Investigation of cases of AAGA (including drug errors) should include an HF analysis NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

What is HF? NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ Ergonomics Encompassing

What is HF? NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ Ergonomics Encompassing all those factors that can influence people and their behaviour. In a work context, HF are the environment, organisational and job factors and individual characteristics which influence behaviour NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ HF on the agenda 2013

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ HF on the agenda 2013 NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP and HF detection: wrong methodology NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP and HF detection: wrong methodology NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Poor methodology ■■■■■ NAP 4 report

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Poor methodology ■■■■■ NAP 4 report – 40% of reports included HF contribution – 25% of this subset (10%) major contributor to poor outcome – Poor judgement commonest Flin et al – – Telephone interviews with reporters to NAP 4 100% of interviews identified HF contribution Median 4. 5 (1 -10 per case) Commonest; situation awareness: job factors; person awareness NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Classifications 1 Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Classifications 1 Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Classifications 1 - Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP

Classifications 1 - Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Classification 1 - Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ ‘active

Classification 1 - Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ ‘active failures of healthcare professionals’ (slips, lapses, mistakes and violations) ‘latent organisational failures’ (those circumstances that provide the conditions under which active errors are more likely to lead to patient harm, by defeating barriers in place to prevent this). to the final outcome NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Classifications 1 - Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ •

Classifications 1 - Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ • Routine violations – cutting corners • Optimising violations – furthering personal goals • Necessary violations – made unavoidably to achieve tasks NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Classifications 1 Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Classifications 1 Reason NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Classifications 2 HFIT NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Classifications 2 HFIT NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Classifications 2: HFIT NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Classifications 2: HFIT NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Classification 3 - Lawton NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP

Classification 3 - Lawton NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Classification 4 – NPSA NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP

Classification 4 – NPSA NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

AAGA and HF: Literature NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP

AAGA and HF: Literature NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Literature NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ 1. 2. 3. 4.

Literature NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ 1. 2. 3. 4. Vapouriser turned off after refill Rocuronium before STP (and assumed onset ≈panc) Inadequate does of induction or opioid STP allowed to run up IV line and sux given before anaesthesia 5&6. Difficult intubation 7. Emerged too early • • 2/19 uncertain 10/19 no cause found NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Literature 1. 2. 3. 4. ■■■■■

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Literature 1. 2. 3. 4. ■■■■■ Vapouriser turned off after refill Rocuronium before STP (and assumed onset ≈panc) Inadequate does of induction or opioid STP allowed to run up IV line and sux given before anaesthesia 5&6. Difficult intubation 7. Emerged too early • 2/19 uncertain • 10/19 no cause found 41% NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Literature NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5

Literature NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Literature NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ 22 cases…. . 15

Literature NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ 22 cases…. . 15 cases could be attributed to human error. …. . absolute or relative hypnotic drug dosage errors 3 difficult intubations 19 out of 22 cases were considered avoidable. 2 cases of equipment failure 5 cases no cause identified NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Literature ■■■■■ 22 cases…. . 15

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Literature ■■■■■ 22 cases…. . 15 cases could be attributed to human error. …. . absolute or relative hypnotic drug dosage errors 3 difficult intubations 19 out of 22 cases were considered avoidable. 68% 2 cases of equipment failure 5 cases no cause identified NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ • 25 cases…. . •

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ • 25 cases…. . • No ‘causes offered’ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ • 25 cases…. . 0%?

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ • 25 cases…. . 0%? • No ‘causes offered’ X%? NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

RCTs of AAGA/BIS etc NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ ……………HF

RCTs of AAGA/BIS etc NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ ……………HF never mentioned NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Mind the gap NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Mind the gap NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Mind the gap NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Mind the gap NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Induction - HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Induction - HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Induction - HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Induction - HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Induction - HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Induction - HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Slips and lapses…… NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5

Slips and lapses…… NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Slips and lapses…… NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ Latent factors

Slips and lapses…… NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ Latent factors in 100% NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Maintenance and emergence ■■■■■ NAP 5

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Maintenance and emergence ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Monitoring and emergence ■■■■■ NAP 5

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Monitoring and emergence ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Monitoring and emergence ■■■■■ 88% of

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project Monitoring and emergence ■■■■■ 88% of emergence cases were judged preventable NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

LCs’ reports of HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP

LCs’ reports of HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

Do you ever rush? NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP

Do you ever rush? NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

LCs’ reports of HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP

LCs’ reports of HF NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

HF solutions? NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ Better environment Better

HF solutions? NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ Better environment Better planning Checklists Better kit –drug ampoules Technology – Scanning drugs – Single touch timed pauses of gas delivery – Servo control of ETAG – DOA ? ? Better communication NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th

NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project ■■■■■ NAP 5 The 5 th National Audit Project